Examples of using John stuart in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
John Stuart 3rd Earl of Bute.
Emanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and others.
John Stuart Mill, Albert Camus, Richard Dawkins.
The nineteenth-century philosopher John Stuart Mill had a more civilized view.
John Stuart Mill was particularly skeptical about the democratic process.
The term Geisteswissenschaften first was used as translation of John Stuart Mill's term“moral sciences”.
Hence money, as the empiricist John Stuart Mill says, is just the medium of exchange to be more flexible.
To be sure, there were plenty of other nineteenth-century commentators who analyzed the creation of global networks. Butwe do not see a new rush for the works of such figures as John Stuart Mill or Paul Leroy-Beaulieu.
John Stuart Mill the knew Latin, sorry, Greek at the age of three, Latin at eight and at age ten he wrote a history of Roman law.
They have been magnificently captured by John Stuart Mill in an often quoted passage from his" Essay on Liberty"(1859).
Just as John Stuart Mill set the limits of individual freedom at the point at which that freedom infringed on the liberty of others, tolerance is limited only by intolerance.
The phrase"machinery of government" is thought to have originated with John Stuart Mill in Considerations on Representative Government(1861).
The philosopher John Stuart Mill was one of the earliest modern advocates of a direct reference theory beginning in 1843.
Natural monopolies werediscussed as a potential source of market failure by John Stuart Mill, who advocated government regulation to make them serve the public good.
John Stuart Mill, a pre-eminent nineteenth century philosopher, wrote that the laws making it a crime for parents to abuse their children should also be extended to animals.
Mill's Methods are five methods of induction described by philosopher John Stuart Mill in his 1843 book A System of Logic.[1] They are intended to illuminate issues of causation.
LONDON- With humanity's millennia-old focus on collective survival no longer a primary concern, a few fortunate societies in the West have become preoccupied with matters of human, or individual, rights. In recent decades, we have experienced a secondflowering of the individualism associated with such nineteenth-century thinkers as John Stuart Mill.
The 19th century writings of John Stuart Mill are also considered important in the formation of current conceptions of the scientific method, as well as anticipating later accounts of scientific explanation.
But beyond this, one should view secular stagnation as an opportunity rather than a threat. The classical economists of the nineteenth century looked forward to what they called a“stationary state,” when,in the words of John Stuart Mill, the life of“struggling to get on… trampling, crushing, elbowing, and treading on each other's heels” would no longer be needed.
Over the following century, economists like John Stuart Mill, Walter Bagehot, Irving Fisher, Knut Wicksell, and John Maynard Keynes devised a list of steps to take in order to avoid or cure a depression.
Say(1803), distinguishing the subject from its public-policy uses, defines it as the science of production, distribution, and consumption of wealth.[5] On the satirical side, Thomas Carlyle(1849) coined'the dismal science' as an epithet for classical economics, in this context,commonly linked to the pessimistic analysis of Malthus(1798).[6] John Stuart Mill(1844) defines the subject in a social context as.
The English liberal thinker John Stuart Mill famously argues that we should be free to publish a newspaper article saying that corn-dealers are starvers of the poor but not free to deliver the same message to an excited mob assembled before the house of a corn-dealer.
Classical economics(also known as liberal economics) asserts that markets function best with minimal government interference.[1] It was developed in the late 18th andearly 19th century by Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, Thomas Robert Malthus, and John Stuart Mill. Many writers found Adam Smith's idea of free markets more convincing than the idea, widely accepted at the time, of protectionism.
A Few Words on Non-Intervention" is a short essay by the philosopher,politician and economist, John Stuart Mill. It was written in 1859[1] in the context of the construction of the Suez Canal and the recent Crimean War. The essay addresses the question of under what circumstances states should be allowed to intervene in the sovereign affairs of another country.
In 1829, John Stuart Mill made the key intellectual leap in figuring out how to fight what he called“general gluts.” Mill saw that excess demand for some particular set of assets in financial markets was mirrored by excess supply of goods and services in product markets, which in turn generated excess supply of workers in labor markets.
Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy(1844)is a treatise on political economics by John Stuart Mill.[1] Walras' law, a principle in general equilibrium theory named in honour of Léon Walras,[2] was first expressed by Mill in this treatise.[3].
In his classic essay On Liberty, John Stuart Mill defended free speech on the ground that free inquiry was necessary to advance knowledge. Restrictions on certain areas of historical inquiry are based on the opposite premise: the truth is known, and it is impious to question it.
BERKELEY- The central insight ofmacroeconomics is a fact that was known to John Stuart Mill in the first third of the nineteenth century: there can be a large gap between supply and demand for pretty much all currently produced goods and services and types of labor if there is an equally large excess demand for financial assets.
The nineteenth-century philosopher John Stuart Mill was of the“anyone can do it” school. He was convinced that his achievements were in no way due to superior heredity: anyone of“normal intelligence and health,” subjected to his father's educational system- which included learning Greek at the age of three- could have become John Stuart Mill.
Discussions of how far the state may go inpromoting the health of its population often start with John Stuart Mill's principle of limiting the state's coercive power to acts that prevent harm to others. Mill could have accepted requirements for health warnings on cigarette packs, and even graphic photos of diseased lungs if that helps people to understand the choice that they are making; but he would have rejected a ban.