Examples of using Differences were observed in English and their translations into Bulgarian
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Gender-based differences were observed in the two groups.
No differences were observed in the morphology of the different batches of particles prepared from 2% polymer solutions.
Gender- No gender differences were observed after adjustment for body weight.
No differences were observed in the first 3 days, while 7 days of storage caused an increase in the staling rate for all the bread samples.
In this small number of patients no differences were observed in either pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic parameters.
No differences were observed regarding the SPID parameter.
If high amounts of zinc were administered for only one week, no differences were observed between treatments, while administration of high levels of zinc during two or three weeks significantly reduced the number of days with diarrhoea per piglet.
No differences were observed in quality of life between the treatment and placebo arms.
Similarly, no plasma clearance differences were observed between black and Caucasian patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.
No differences were observed between the cell-culture and the comparator egg-derived vaccine.
In this small number of patients no differences were observed in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinically noteworthy adverse events or clinical efficacy.
No differences were observed when comparing Trimbow and the extemporary triple combination made of fluticasone and vilanterol fixed combination plus tiotropium.
In this small number of patients no differences were observed in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinically noteworthy adverse events or clinical efficacy.
No differences were observed in inattention and mood between patients randomised to placebo versus those randomised to Palynziq during this 8-week duration.
Statistically significant differences were observed in favour of letrozole 2.5 mg compared to megestrol acetate in overall objective tumour response rate(24% vs 16%, P=0.04), and in time to treatment failure(P=0.04).
No differences were observed in the in vitro activity of retapamulin versus S. aureus whether the isolates were susceptible or resistant to methicillin.
Very little differences were observed in rates of other“vaccine-preventable” diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, meningitis, rotavirus and influenza.
No overall differences were observed in the safety of IONSYS fentanyl 40 micrograms in elderly patients(≥ 65 years including a subpopulation≥ 75 years) and adult patients for all controlled studies.
No differences were observed when comparing Trimbow and the extemporary triple combination made of a fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol plus tiotropium(difference of 3 mL in pre-dose FEV1 after 52 weeks of treatment).
No differences were observed when comparing Trimbow with the extemporary triple combination made of beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol fixed combination plus tiotropium(moderate/severe exacerbation rate: 0.46 versus 0.45 events per patient/year).
No difference was observed between leflunomide and sulphasalazine(study MN301).
No difference was observed in the indicators of renal function.
No difference was observed in pharmacodynamic properties between the adult and the paediatric population.
No difference was observed in any of the other secondary endpoints analysed in the ITT population.
Data from 809 patients receiving Nespo in European clinical studies were analysed to assess the dose required to maintain haemoglobin; no difference was observed between the average weekly dose administered via the intravenous or subcutaneous routes of injection.
Cobicistat exposures were unaffected by a light meal and although there was a modest decrease of 24% and 18% in Cmax andAUC respectively with a high-fat meal, no difference was observed in its pharmacoenhancing effect on elvitegravir.
No difference was observed for pramipexole as compared to placebo for either the primary endpoint or for any of the secondary efficacy endpoints including YGTSS total score, Patient Global Impression of Improvement(PGI-I), Clinical Global Impression of Improvement(CGI-I), or Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness(CGI-S).
No difference was observed for pramipexole as compared to placebo for either the primary endpoint or for any of the secondary efficacy endpoints including YGTSS total score, Patient Global Impression of Improvement(PGI-I), Clinical Global Impression of Improvement(CGI-I), or Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness(CGI-S).
As expected on the basis of the study design, no difference was observed in remission duration, disease-free survival or overall survival, although patients with complete molecular response and remaining in minimal residual disease had a better outcome in terms of both remission duration(p=0.01) and disease-free survival(p=0.02).
The primary analysis of this pivotal trial provided a 24-week comparison of only 4 patients on eteplirsen exposed to theproposed dose of 30mg/kg/week versus placebo(n=4), and additionally 4 patients exposed to 50 mg/kg/week, in which no difference was observed in the 6MWD.