Examples of using Intermediate category in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The new intermediate category remains controversial.
This money could certainly be reallocated to a new intermediate category of regions.
This intermediate category could be aimed at regions with per capita GDP of between 75% and 90% of the EU average.
Yes' to the creation of an intermediate category of support for the regions.
This is why we in the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance are voting in favour of an intermediate category.
They will be fully eligible for the intermediate category and will certainly even be the main beneficiaries.
When confronted with so many regions that have been affected,it would be negligent not to establish an intermediate category.
The first is the dispute regarding the so-called intermediate category, which runs very much along national lines.
This intermediate category will also be fairer for it will provide similar support to regions which have a comparable level of development.
Therefore, I am calling on my fellow Members to support this new intermediate category when it comes to the vote.
We are of the opinion that the intermediate category will help regions which need more support than the classic Objective 2 regions.
The Garriga Polledo report assumes a figure of between 75 and 90% for the intermediate category for regional support.
The intermediate category contradicts the principle of converging European regions whose development is below the average European Union level.
My second point is that significant fundamental resistance to the intermediate category still exists within the political groupings.
On this subject, I would like to revisit a point that I think is particularly important:the establishment of a new intermediate category.
There was much controversy in our group as well about the intermediate category, and it was decided to have a free vote.
As for creating an intermediate category for regions whose GDP is between 75 and 90% of average European GDP, I am in agreement, provided a double condition is met.
It is likely that a majority in Parliament will be in favour of an intermediate category with high subsidy rates for less disadvantaged regions.
I agree with the content of the text, although there are two points that I did not agree with and which I opposed: the tax on financial transactions andthe amendments to introduce the'intermediate category.
The United Kingdom already has such an intermediate category of‘worker', and Belgium and the Netherlands feature a rebuttable presumption of employment.
I do not believe that the temporary Special committee on the policy challenges andbudgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 is the right body to make recommendations for such an intermediate category.
I am therefore glad that the European Commission has proposed creating an intermediate category for regions where GDP per capita is between 75 and 90% of the EU average.
The addition of an intermediate category, on the other hand, would compromise the horizontal approach for Objective 2 regions, which has proven to be effective in recent years, the phasing-out system and funds for Objective 1 regions.
Thus, I particularly support the proposal, put forward in the Pieper report,proposing the creation of an intermediate category for regions where GDP is between 75 and 90% of the EU average.
However, if we do not create this intermediate category, we can be sure that the budget for cohesion policy will be cut. By creating it, we will preserve this budget.
This is currently under discussion by the Committee on Regional Development,as is a proposal for an intermediate category of 75 to 90% GDP, as suggested in the Garriga Polledo report.
I consider it important to create an intermediate category for regions whose per capita gross domestic product(GDP) is between 75% and 90% of EU GDP, thus contributing to increased equality at regional level.
Without adequate resources, none of these problems will be properly dealt with,beginning with the introduction of the intermediate category in cohesion policy, which only makes sense if it does not harm the other categories already in place.
It does not affect my colleagues in Ireland or ourselves at all because even though we are in the IMF- and we are broke as a country- we are well above the European average in GDP terms;so whether there is an intermediate category or not does not affect us.
It would be very helpful if this threshold effect could be attenuated by creating an intermediate category of regions between the'convergence' objective and the'regional competitiveness and employment' objective.