Examples of using Crossborder structures in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Strategic cooperation requires permanent and"binding" crossborder structures.
Whilst the development of genuinely crossborder structures is quite difficult to achieve in a short period of time, some practical arrangements can be set up swiftly.
Strategic cooperation requires permanent and"binding" crossborder structures.
Moreover, regional crossborder structures in the Nordic countries have considerable similarities with the Euroregions, especially in terms of identity, capacity, and role in INTERREG IIA.
AEBR currently has 79 Members, comprising first level regions andlocal authorities or crossborder structures.
These Euroregions are at the same time the most advanced crossborder structures in the Central and Eastern European countries.
In some cases this is done through a formal INTERREG agreement between the competent Member State authorities andthe relevant regional/local crossborder structures.
A number of"generic" requirements for EU-programme related crossborder structures and procedures arise from.
Crossborder structures: There were regional/local level crossborder structures, to a large extent, in practically all internal border areas(land and sea borders) and external border areas.
A significant step forward was taken with the introduction of common regional crossborder structures"Euregio.
In the year 2000. there are already numerous crossborder structures in Central and Eastern Europe"7, which show a considerable diversity as far as their objectives, powers and capacities are concerned See: Table 10.
Limited experience of regional/local players in programme development and management, in the aforementioned borders,especially in the border regions which lack crossborder structures(See below);
The programmes built on many years of experience and existing crossborder structures such as the Euroregions on the Dutch/German border.
There are now many crossborder structures in existence, representing a considerable diversity in purpose, powers and capacities including involvement in INTERREG and related programme or projects.
PL/D, CZ/D, CZ/A, HU/A. EST/FIN: These are land frontiers with established crossborder structures and considerable experience in programming and implementation.
The strengthening of crossborder structures and secretariats.• the development and implementation of programmes in the period 2000-2006 and their financial management.• the sector-specific development of projects with the help of regional seminars, assistance and information.
The second category represented a top-down approach,with programmes compiled by national authorities without the involvement of crossborder structures, in the few cases that such structures existed e.g. Pyrénées for E/F.
LACE has promoted crossborder cooperation and crossborder structures throughout Europe and has been actively involved in strengthening networking between border regions and facilitating the transfer of know-how and best practice.
Even if different framework conditions may require(or allow for) specific cooperation structures, it is vital to recognise that developing crossborder structures does not mean creating new layers of government and legal entities let alone under international law.
Crossborder structures for each national border have evolved in various ways and in many cases now involve elaborate crossborder structures with the JPMC at their apex, and various other components below e.g. sectoral working groups in HU/A. and Euroregions in PL/D.
The Guidelines also contain precise provisions regarding joint crossborder structures responsible for the overall implementation(technical management and financial management) of new INTERREG IIIA programmes.
SK/HU, RO/BG, FYROM/BG and FYROM/AL: These are less advanced" regions with little or no practical experience in crossborder programmes and projects,as well as lacking well-established crossborder structures only on the SK/HU border there are newly created Euroregions.
Regional and local authorities in border areas and regional-level crossborder structures are expected to take the lead in the preparation of' the programmes, working in partnership with national authorities where appropriate.
In some cases there are experienced crossborder structures(Carpathian and Niemen Euroregions) and there are strong crossborder initiatives in other cases, including the formation of new crossborder structures e.g. on the borders of PL/SK. EST/LV/RF. HU/RO.
Not all of these relatively loose activities need their own permanent crossborder structure.
Slovakia on its border with Austria, and to some extent Bulgaria,where there is only one crossborder structure, the Euroregion Mesta/Nestos BG/GR;
These regional/local structures under national law(national legal"crutches") serve to conclude crossborder private-law agreements which can be used to form a joint crossborder structure.
Structures for crossborder cooperation with their bodies(a joint branch office and a joint budget need) should in general be developed as both a result of and a tool for increasing cooperation, not as an end in themselves.