What is the translation of " MARGIN SQUEEZE " in Danish?

• prispres

Examples of using Margin squeeze in English and their translations into Danish

Ii The method used by the Commission to calculate the margin squeeze.
Ii Kommissionens metode til beregning af prispresset.

Fourth part: the margin squeeze identified had no effect on the market.
Fjerde led: det fastslåede prispres havde ingen indvirkning på markedet a Parternes argumenter.

Third part: alleged calculation error in the finding of a margin squeeze.
Tredje led: angivelig fejl ved fastslåelsen af prispresset a Parternes argumenter.

Competition- Dominant position- Abuse- Margin squeeze- Meaning- Criteria for assessment.
Konkurrence- dominerende stilling- misbrug- prispres- begreb- bedømmelseskriterier Art.

Second part: unlawfulness of the method used by the Commission to establish a margin squeeze.
Andet led: Kommissionen har anvendt en ulovlig metode til at fastslå, om der forekom prispres a Parternes argumenter.

That margin squeeze still existed at the time of the adoption of the contested decision recital 161 to the contested decision.
Prispresset fandtes endnu, da den anfægtede beslutning blev vedtaget betragtning 161 til den anfægtede beslutning.

First part: absence of an abuse as the applicant did not have sufficient scope to avoid a margin squeeze.
Første led: manglende misbrug, da sagsøgeren ikke havde tilstrækkeligt råderum til at undgå prispres a Parternes argumenter.

Contrary to[the applicant's] view, however, the margin squeeze is a form of abuse that is relevant to this case.
I modsætning til[sagsøgerens] opfattelse er misbrug i form af prispres imidlertid relevant i det foreliggende tilfælde. På forbundne markeder.

However, the abusive nature of the applicant's conduct is connected with the unfairness of the spread between its prices for wholesale access and its retail prices, which takes the form of a margin squeeze.
At sagsøgerens adfærd havde karakter af misbrug, skyldes imidlertid den urimelige forskel mellem sagsøgerens engrospriser og detailpriser, som havde form af et prispres.

Finally, the argument relating to RegTP's examination of the margin squeeze must be rejected for the reasons set out in paragraphs 267 to 269 above.
Endelig må argumentet om, at RegTP havde undersøgt spørgsmålet om prispres, forkastes af de grunde, der blev anført i præmis 267-269 ovenfor.

In the present case, according to the contested decision(recital 201),‘[t]he abuse committed by[the applicant] consists in the imposition of unfair prices in the form of a margin squeeze to the detriment of[the applicant's] competitors.
I denne sag fastslås det i den anfægtede beslutning(betragtning 201), at sagsøgerens»misbrug består i, at selskabet har gennemtvunget urimelige priser i form af et prispres til ulempe for[dets] konkurrenter«.

Competition- Dominant position- Abuse- Margin squeeze- Telecommunications network access services offered by the owner-operator of the only infrastructure available.
Konkurrence- dominerende stilling- misbrug- prispres- adgangstjenester til telenettet leveret af en operatør, som ejer den eneste tilgængelige infrastruktur.

It follows that the reduction in call charges would have created sufficient scope to end entirely the margin squeeze identified in the contested decision.
Heraf følger, at det råderum, nedsættelsen af samtaleafgifterne skabte, ville have været tilstrækkeligt til fuldstændigt at eliminere det prispres, der fastslås i den anfægtede beslutning.

That operator cannot be unaware that that margin squeeze, resulting from the negative or insufficient spread between its charges for those different services, entails serious restrictions on competition.
Denne operatør kan ikke være uvidende om, at dette prispres, der skyldes det negative eller utilstrækkelige spænd mellem dens afgifter for disse forskellige tjenesteydelser, medfører alvorlige begrænsninger for konkurrencen.

Thus it is clear that‘[t]he abuse committed by[the applicant] consists in the imposition of unfair prices in the form of a margin squeeze to the detriment of its competitors' recital 201 to the contested decision.
Det fremgår således klart, at»[sagsøgerens] misbrug består i, at selskabet har gennemtvunget urimelige priser i form af et prispres til ulempe for[dets] konkurrenter« betragtning 201 til den anfægtede beslutning.

The applicant submits that the abusive nature of a margin squeeze can arise only from the abusive nature of retail prices alone, since the Commission does not deny that the prices of wholesale access are mandatorily set by the official authorities.
Sagsøgeren har gjort gældende, at et eventuelt misbrug i form af et prispres alene kan skyldes, at detailpriserne havde karakter af misbrug, eftersom Kommissionen ikke har bestridt, at de offentlige myndigheder fastsætter bindende engrospriser.

Third, the applicant observes that, in the absence of Community caselaw and of previous Commission practice in taking decisions on margin squeezes in the telecommunications sector, it never doubted that RegTP's assessment was correct.
For det tredje har sagsøgeren i mangel af fællesskabsretspraksis og beslutningspraksis fra Kommissionen vedrørende prispres på teleområdet aldrig har været i tvivl om, at RegTP's vurdering var korrekt.

A margin squeeze exists if the charges to be paid to[the applicant] for wholesale access, taking monthly charges and one-off charges together, are so expensive that competitors are forced to charge their endusers prices higher than the prices[the applicant] charges its own endusers for similar services.
Der foreligger prispres, når summen af de månedlige afgifter og engangsafgifter, der skal betales til[sagsøgeren] for engrosadgang, tvinger konkurrenterne til at opkræve højere afgifter hos slutbrugerne, end[sagsøgeren] fakturerer sine egne slutbrugere for tilsvarende tjenester.

Iii Absence of an abuse because the applicant had insufficient scope to avoid a margin squeeze by increasing its retail prices in the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001.
Iii Manglende misbrug som følge af, at sagsøgeren ikke havde tilstrækkeligt råderum til at undgå prispres ved at forhøje sine detailpriser i perioden fra den 1. januar 1998 til den 31. december 2001.

Furthermore, in the same period, RegTP concluded in its decisions of 8 February 1999, 23 December 1999, 30 March 2001, 21 December 2001, 11 April 2002 and 29 April 2003 that no margin squeeze existed to the detriment of competitors.
Endvidere har RegTP i samme periode fundet, nemlig i sine afgørelser af 8. februar 1999, 23. december 1999, 30. marts 2001, 21. december 2001, 11. april 2002 og 29. april 2003, at der ikke forekom prispres til skade for konkurrenterne.

The Commission cannot consider that discretion in isolation, since the margin squeeze was not calculated on the basis of the T-DSL(ADSL) charges alone, but on the basis of all the retail prices.
Dels kan Kommissionen ikke vurdere dette råderum isoleret, idet prispresberegningen er foretaget ikke kun på grundlag af afgifterne for T-DSL(ADSL), men på grundlag af samtlige detailpriser.

In the second place, as regards the complaint relating to the protection of legitimate expectations, it must be borne in mind that, in a number of decisions taken in the period covered by the contested decision, RegTP did in fact consider whether a margin squeeze resulted from the applicant's charges.
For det andet bemærkes vedrørende anbringendet om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning, at RegTP ganske vist i flere afgørelser, der blev truffet i den periode, som er omfattet af den anfægtede beslutning, undersøgte, om sagsøgerens afgifter medførte prispres.

In considering in its decision of 29 April 2003 whether the applicant's charges were leading to a margin squeeze that would distort competition, RegTP also regarded as decisive the fact that the applicant's competitors are in a position to obtain additional revenue from call services.
Da RegTP i sin afgørelse af 29. april 2003 undersøgte, om sagsøgerens afgifter førte til et prispres, der fordrejede konkurrencen, anså RegTP det for afgørende, at selskabets konkurrenter kan opnå supplerende indtægter fra samtaletjenester.

In this connection, it is worth pointing out that, in Decision 2003/707/EC, the Commission took the view that the rates being contested in the present case, which were set by the decision of the German regulatory authority of 30 March 2001, had resulted in a margin squeeze contrary to Article 82 EC, committed by Deutsche Telekom over the period up to May 2003.
Det bemærkes, at Kommissionen i sin beslutning af 21. maj 2003 er af den opfattelse, at de i denne sag anfægtede priser, der er fastsat ved den tyske tilsynsmyndigheds afgørelse af 30. marts 2001, har ført til et prispres i strid med artikel 82 EF, begået af Deutsche Telekom indtil maj 2003 34.

The Commission was entitled to take the view in the contested decision(recital 111) that, in order to calculate the margin squeeze, the price of wholesale access had to be compared to the weighted average of retail prices for all access services, namely analogue narrowband access, digital narrowband access(ISDN) and broadband access in the form of ADSL services.
Kommissionen kunne derfor med føje finde i den anfægtede beslutning(betragtning 111), at engrospriserne for at beregne prispresset skulle sammenlignes med et vejet gennemsnit af detailpriserne for samtlige adgangstjenester, dvs. analog smalbåndsadgang, digital smalbåndsadgang(ISDN) og bredbåndsadgang i form af ADSL.

An attenuating circumstance the fact that the national regulatory authority for telecommunications intervened in setting the undertaking's prices and that that authority has, on several occasions, considered the question of the existence of a margin squeeze resulting from the tariff practices of the undertaking, when reducing the basic amount of the fine by 10.
Omstændighed- behørigt hensyn til, at den nationale tilsynsmyndighed for teleområdet har grebet ind i fastsættelsen af virksomhedens priser, og at denne myndighed ved flere lejligheder har undersøgt spørgsmålet vedrørende eksistensen af prispres som følge af virksomhedens afgifter, ved at nedsætte bødens grundbeløb med 10.

For if, by exercising its discretion, the applicant had ended the margin squeeze as from 1998, it would have sufficed for the applicant to maintain the balance between its charges for wholesale access and its retail charges in order to avoid the margin squeeze identified in the contested decision throughout the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001.
Hvis sagsøgeren ved at udnytte sit råderum havde elimineret prispresset fra og med 1998, ville selskabet for at undgå det prispres, der fastslås i den anfægtede beslutning, i hele perioden fra den 1. januar 1998 til den 31. december 2001 blot have skullet opretholde forholdet mellem sine engros- og detailpriser.

In the third place, it is necessary to consider whether the applicant used the discretion which it had in relation to its retail prices in order to avoid the margin squeeze identified in the contested decision in the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001.
For det tredje skal det undersøges, om sagsøgeren udnyttede sit råderum til at ændre sine detailpriser med henblik på at undgå det prispres, der fastslås i den anfægtede beslutning, i perioden fra den 1. januar 1998 til den 31. december 2001.

The Commission concludes that the margin squeeze in access to the local network still existed at the time of the adoption of the contested decision(recital 161 to the contested decision), since the applicant's productspecific costs for providing retail services still exceeded the positive spread between retail and wholesale prices recital 160 to the contested decision.
Kommissionen drager den konklusion, at der på tidspunktet for vedtagelsen af den anfægtede beslutning stadig forekom prispres i forbindelse med adgangen til abonnentnettet(betragtning 161 til den anfægtede beslutning), eftersom sagsøgerens specifikke omkostninger ved at levere tjenester til slutbrugere oversteg det positive spænd mellem detail- og engrospriserne betragtning 160 til den anfægtede beslutning.

Having regard to the fact that the applicant's wholesale services are thus indispensible to enabling a competitor to enter into competition with the applicant on the downstream market in retail access services, a margin squeeze between the applicant's wholesale and retail charges will in principle hinder the growth of competition in the downstream markets.
Da sagsøgerens engrostjenester således er en forudsætning for, at en konkurrent til sagsøgeren kan optage konkurrence med selskabet på det efterfølgende marked for adgang til abonnentnettet, vil prispres mellem sagsøgerens engros- og detailpriser i princippet udgøre en hindring for udvikling af konkurrencen på de efterfølgende markeder.

How to use "margin squeeze" in an English sentence

The leading EU case on margin squeeze was a preliminary reference from Sweden, TeliaSonera (C-52/09).

The margin squeeze means lowered prices by large competitors are forcing others to decrease margins.

Does the finding of a margin squeeze depend on the methodology used for its assessment?

The resulting margin squeeze will drive many medical products and pharma companies out of business.

There has been a margin squeeze that resulted in consumers getting less attention and less choice.

For those pricing in Sterling, any volume thrill is extinguished by margin squeeze as costs rise.

Where do you rank margin squeeze created by Asian manufacturers in terms of your greatest challenge?

They also tend to reach to the same conclusion by applying margin squeeze over the commissions.

Despite the recovering economic picture, the battle against margin squeeze is as prevalent and fierce as ever.

The threat of a structural margin squeeze is real and presents a serious obstacle to potential challengers.

How to use "prispres" in a Danish sentence

Da Novo Nordisk året efter alligevel nedjusterede på grund af prispres, blev Sanofis adm.

Prispres og et muligt loft over medicinalpriser har netop været blandt årsagerne til, at sektoren har haft det svært det sidste halve år.

Det skyldes særligt prispres fra regionerne, lyder det fra branchen selv.

Det skyldes en kombination af flere ting, blandt andet prispres, produktmiks og geografiske forskelle.

På baggrund af et markant og tiltagende prispres venter markedet spændt på at høre, om det er lykkedes SAS at accelerere omkostningsreduktionerne.

Efter vores mening ændrer dagens tal ikke på det underliggende prispres i økonomien, der stadig er moderat.

Prispres i det europæiske marked I den transatlantiske rutetrafik var der også fremgang.

aktie for Novozymes qua højere end ventet prispres i centrale dele af forretningen.

Den administrerende direktør begrunder fyringsrunden med prispres fra globale aktører.

Valutaudsving og prispres skubber Laudrup Vinimport tilbage Til direktørens overraskelse skrumpede resultaterne sidste år hos Laudrup Vinimport.