Examples of using Proposal does not go in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives.
In the delegation's opinion, reform of the scheme to distribute milk to schools is necessary, but the proposal does not go far enough.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve its objectives.
However, we do not do so with great joy because, as I think has been expressed in different ways by all the groups in this House and by the Commission, this proposal does not go nearly as far as is necessary.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
In view of its objective andin accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, this proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the energy efficiency target.
I share the view of the draftsman of the opinion, Mr Blokland, that this proposal does not go far enough and that it continues to permit exceptions for too long a term. I will be voting against the proposal. .
The proposal does not go beyond what is strictly necessary to achieve its objectives.
In certain circumstances the need to obtain a passenger's written agreement could create problems andthe Committee welcomes the clarification by the Commission that the proposal does not go beyond the current Regulation in requiring a written receipt for compensation.
This proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the envisaged objectives.
What I want to say to the Commission representative and to you, as our representative here,is that if this proposal does not go to conciliation in which the view of Parliament is heard, including the views of those Member States who were not members of the Union when this proposal first came forward, then we make a mockery of our right to be consulted and to be absorbed into this discussion.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary or appropriate to achieve the expected objectives.
We know that the Commission proposal does not go far enough; unfortunately this also applies to the proposal by the Committee on the Environment.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives of the legislative proposal. .
However, it considers that the proposal does not go far enough and that it is desirable to broaden its scope to include other crisis management measures, e.g. income insurance schemes.
This proposal does not go beyond what is required and what is adding value at the EU-level.
Proportionality principle This proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the underlying objectives of improving the protection of European critical infrastructure.
The proposal does not go beyond what is absolutely necessary at EU level in order to achieve the objectives set.
In light of this, the proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve its objectives and is therefore compliant with the principle of proportionality.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective pursued, i.e. to strengthen and rationalise Community pharmacovigilance system.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objective of ensuring the reduction of petrol vapour emissions from refuelling activities.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective pursued, i.e. harmonisation of requirements for the evaluation and supervision of changes to medicinal products.
On the whole, this proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of ensuring the security of EU citizens without unnecessarily restricting the internal market.
This proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective, and is therefore in accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of simplifying and rationalising the existing legal framework in order to establish a single practical implementation report.
The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives pursued, given the energy and climate policy objectives agreed at Union level and the obstacles to develop adequate energy infrastructures.
The proposal does not go further than what is necessary to achieve the intended aim while leaving sufficient room for Member States to make decisions as regards the specifics of these mechanisms and does not impose disproportionate costs.
The proposal does not go beyond what is strictly necessary to achieve its objectives. It allows Member States to decide on the appointment of the competent authorities and out-of-court redress bodies, using existing bodies, if deemed appropriate.
The Proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of simplifying the recognition and enforcement of decisions on parental responsibility, and thus meets the requirements of subsidiarity and proportionality set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.