Examples of using Efficacy analysis in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Primary efficacy analysis.
For the resistance analyses, a broader definition of virologic failure was used than in the primary efficacy analysis.
Pooled efficacy analysis.
Patients who met the entry criteria and received one ormore doses of caspofungin study therapy were included in the efficacy analysis.
Eligible for efficacy analysis, n.
Table 8 Efficacy analysis in pooled data from NV-02B-007(GLOBE), NV-02B-015 and CLDT600A2303 studies.
There were 1,095patients included in the primary Modified Intention-To-Treat(MITT) efficacy analysis of overall favourable response; caspofungin(33.9%) was as effective as liposomal amphotericin B(33.7%)% difference.
Post-hoc efficacy analysis in patients who maintained a high or very high DRL at randomisation.
Of the 35 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 85.7%(95% CI: 69.7, 95.2) had a treatment response to XGEVA.
The efficacy analysis also demonstrated that treatment with cholic acid significantly improved ALT and AST values for patients stratified by single enzyme defects.
Table 4 below shows the results of the week 48 and the week 96 efficacy analysis for patients treated with rilpivirine and patients treated with efavirenz from the pooled data from the ECHO and THRIVE trials.
The primary efficacy analysis was performed at week 48 with study continuation to week 96 and demonstrated non-inferiority.
AM months bNumber of study participants for year 1 or year 2 primary efficacy analysis. cReduction in culture-confirmed influenza illness relative to placebo. dData presented for clinical trial D153-P504 are for study participants who received two doses of study vaccine or placebo.
Pooled efficacy analysis of the two 6-month Phase III studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of 29% in the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations(requiring treatment with antibiotics or corticosteroids or resulting in hospitalisations) with Brimica Genuair compared to placebo rates per patient per year: 0.29 vs.
Table 1: Primary Efficacy Analysis- Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Most Bothersome Symptom ITT, LOCF.
Pooled efficacy analysis of the 6-month and 3-month placebo controlled studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations(requiring treatment with antibiotics or corticosteroids or resulting in hospitalisations) with aclidinium 322 µg twice daily compared to placebo rate per patient per year: 0.31 vs 0.44 respectively; p=0.0149.
In Study CAC-91-10-10 the efficacy analysis showed that treatment with cholic acid significantly improved, i.e. decreased, urinary bile acid excretion in patients with single enzyme defects.
The final efficacy analysis included all patients randomized to both parts of the study.
In an interim analysis of Study CAC-002-01, the efficacy analysis of urinary bile acids and transaminases using the comparison from baseline to worst post-baseline value for the overall population that included both patients on cholic acid at study start and treatment naive patients showed no statistically significant changes.
The key efficacy analyses were ORR based on independent radiologic review and duration of objective response.
Secondary efficacy analyses over 144 weeks included the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA concentrations< 400 or< 50 copies/ ml, and change from baseline in CD4 cell count.
Efficacy analyses from ET743-OVA-301.