Examples of using Standardisation should in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Therefore, standardisation should be clearly defined.
Platforms are spaceless and boundaryless so this standardisation should be used.
Standardisation should not hamper innovation and development.
Legislation, regulation and standardisation should be addressed in the follow-on programme.
Standardisation should, however, be implemented carefully and with the involvement of the interested parties.
Is of the opinion that participation in standardisation should be as important as participation in the legislative process.
Standardisation should not result in de facto monopolies for specific products no choice for the consumer.
The Commission is of the opinion that European standardisation should be increased in this field.
Participation in standardisation should be as important as participation in the legislative process.
A study commissioned in 2006 has enabled the identification andranking of a list of products for which standardisation should be launched as a priority.
The standardisation should be subject to acceptance by each Member State on a voluntary basis.
Integration of environmental aspects into standardisation should also be promoted at an international level;
Finally, standardisation should also ensure that e- and m-payment solutions offered to consumers are easy to access and user-friendly.
However, the Commission considers that standardisation should be voluntary and industry-led.
Such standardisation should therefore be confined to concepts that can be judged objectively, and which have appreciable economic importance in the Community.
European inter-institutional dialogue on standardisation should give a key role to all the representative bodies concerned.
Standardisation should also play an important role in the context of policies relating to security combat against terrorism and prevention of crime aiming to protect citizens, infrastructures and services which are potential targets.
The EP amendment avoids mandatingthe MHP standard and endorsed the approach whereby standardisation should be industry-led and voluntary.
The result of such standardisation should be the creation of a unique and robust certification regime which is accurate, reliable and fraud resistant.
Council argued that to impose the MHP standard would contradict the new approachon standardisation and the directive's own Article 16 whereby standardisation should be industry-led and voluntary, and to require NRAs to have objectives related to content was not appropriate.
The Work Programme for Standardisation should cater for this, prioritising actions based on market adoption behaviours and needs.
European standardisation should therefore reflect on its organisational structures, including the role of the national standards bodies, in order to respond to the challenges raised by the e-Economy.
In addition, given the specificity of m-payments, standardisation should address the issue of portability of m‑payment applications i.e. how payment applications follow consumers when they change mobile network operators.
For this reason, standardisation should be seen as an integral part of the continuing efforts towards better lawmaking and thus as part of a policy for growth and employment.
A systematic approach to research, innovation and standardisation should be adopted at European and national level to improve the exploitation of research results, help best ideas to reach the market and achieve wide market uptake.
In this respect, standardisation should be promoted as regards, in particular, the use of the International Bank Account Number(IBAN)(1) and the Bank Identifier Code(BIC)(2) necessary for auto.
The European structured inter-institutional dialogue on standardisation should ensure a key proactive role for representative bodies, in particular the CoR and the EESC, given that Article 114 of the TFEU stipulates that the EESC must be consulted.
In this respect, standardisation should be promoted as regards, in particular, the use of the International Bank Account Number( IBAN) and the Bank Identifier Code( BIC) necessary for automated processing of cross-border credit transfers.
Yet although there is a great temptation to do so, standardisation should not be followed up with measures that interfere with the sovereign laws of individual states, for example those relating to the age of drivers, medical examinations or systems for training learner drivers.
Commission policy is that, in general, standardisation should be an industry led process; it is for market players to agree and introduce standards in a timely and consensual manner, in order to meet their own business needs.