Examples of using Comparators in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Linear- Comparators.
In the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer,Alimta was as effective as the comparators.
Logic- Comparators(421).
Operational amplifiers and comparators(1557).
Measuring machines and comparators, measuring microscopes, and other precision measuring devices.
The causes of these findings remain unknown, but poorer efficacy and safety than the study comparators cannot be ruled out.
Edarbi was compared with placebo and active comparators in two 6 week randomised, double blind studies.
The incidence rates observed for first MACE+ were 1.2 and1.1 events per 100 person-years for Eperzan versus all comparators, respectively.
The hazard ratio for Eperzan versus comparators for MACE+ was 1.0(95% CI 0.68, 1.49).
The table also includes adverse reactions with a frequency>1% in the Adlyxin group if the frequencywas greater than 2 times the frequency for all comparators group.
Researchers, planners and comparators advertising media professionals who are responsible for developing research processes and planning and buying advertising media.
The source signals, whose phase difference is to be measured,are fed as inputs to two comparators, which are configured as zero-cross detectors(ZCDs).
Only 6 of the 30 drugs had active comparators, and these trials resulted in higher ICERs compared with placebo comparator trials.
The table presents adverse reactions that occurred with an incidence> 5% if the frequency was higher amongLyxumia treated patients than patients treated with all comparators.
Two of these studies used haloperidol andlithium(another antipsychotic medicine) as comparators and continued for a further nine weeks to look at the maintenance of the effect of the medicines.
In controlled clinical trials, angioedema and hypersensitivity reactions occurred rarely during treatment withaliskiren with rates comparable to treatment with placebo or comparators.
The studies in children were in the same types of infections, and the comparators were ceftriaxone(CAP; 389 children) and ticarcillin/ clavulanate(intra-abdominal infections; 105 children).
In all Phase 3 and 4(cSSTI and cIAI) studies, death occurred in 2.4%(54/2216) of patients receiving tigecycline and 1.7%(37/2206)of patients receiving active comparators.
In additional studies using non-selective NSAID comparators, approximately 7400 arthritis patients have been treated with celecoxib at daily doses up to 800 mg, including approximately 2300 patients treated for 1 year or longer.
In clinical studies, marked increases in plasma CPK to> 5x Upper Limit of Normal(ULN) without muscle symptoms occurred more commonly in Cubicin-treated patients(1.9%)than in those that received comparators(0.5%).
In a meta-analysis of phase II and III studies, a total of 51 patients(dulaglutide:26[N= 3,885]; all comparators: 25[N= 2,125]) experienced at least one cardiovascular(CV) event(death due to CV causes, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalisation for unstable angina).
It is necessary to lay down clear rules based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, for the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions savings from biofuels,bioliquids and biomass fuels and their fossil fuel comparators.
N=335, mean age= 6.3 years; comparators: n=349, mean age= 6.2 years; age range= 1 to 17 years revealed an incidence of suspected drug-related arthropathy(discerned from joint-related clinical signs and symptoms) by Day +42 of 7.2% and 4.6%.
The overall incidence of withdrawals from controlled monotherapy trials due to adverse reactions was no greater for patients treated with vildagliptin at doses of 100 mg daily(0.3%)than for placebo(0.6%) or comparators(0.5%).
For the comparators typical resistance was detected with TDF/FTC/EFV(SINGLE; six with NNRTI associated resistance and one with major NRTI resistance) and with 2 NRTIs+ raltegravir(SPRING- 2; four with major NRTI resistance and one with raltegravir resistance), while no de novo resistance was detected in patients treated with 2 NRTIs+ DRV/RTV(FLAMINGO).
In addition, in controlled monotherapy trials with vildagliptin the overall incidence of withdrawals due to adverse reactions was no greater for patients treated with vildagliptin at doses of 100 mg daily(0.3%)than for placebo(0.6%) or comparators(0.5%).
In a retrospective analysis of data from 42 pooled short-term clinical studies, the overall incidence of events typically associated with cardiac ischaemia was higher for rosiglitazone containing regimens,1.99% versus combined active and placebo comparators, 1.51%[Hazard ratio 1.31(95% confidence interval 1.01- 1.70)].
In data from controlled monotherapy and add-on therapy trials of up to 24 weeks in duration, the incidence of ALT or AST elevations≥ 3x ULN(classified as present on at least 2 consecutive measurements or at the final on-treatment visit) was 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.2% forvildagliptin 50 mg once daily, vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily and all comparators, respectively.
The composite endpoint of adjudicated cardiovascular and cerebrovascular(CCV) events[acute coronary syndrome(ACS), transient ischaemic attack(with imaging evidence of infarction), stroke or CCV death],was similar for vildagliptin versus combined active and placebo comparators[Mantel- Haenszel risk ratio 0.84(95% confidence interval 0.63 1.12)].
In an update to this retrospective analysis that included 10 further studies that met the criteria for inclusion, but were not available at the time of the original analysis, the overall incidence of events typically associated with cardiac ischaemia was not statistically different for rosiglitazone containing regimens,2.21% versus combined active and placebo comparators, 2.08%[HR 1.098(95% CI 0.809- 1.354)].