Examples of using Principle of equivalence in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
This is justified by the service contract and also the principle of equivalence.
The poetic function projects the principle of equivalence from the axis of selection to the axis of combination".
Conformity to the EU single set of rules will replace the principle of equivalence.
In accordance with the document, the principle of equivalence between residence permits and short-stay visas will now be applied to long-stay visas.
Therefore, as regards the Commission proposal, we are of the opinion that the principle of equivalence should continue to apply.
This regulation extends the principle of equivalence between residences permits and short-stay visas issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis to long-stay visas.
Such procedural rules must not be lessfavourable than those governing similar domestic situations(principle of equivalence).
Both principles are alsoreflected in Article 1 of Directive 89/665; the principle of equivalence in Article 1(2) and the principle of effectiveness in Article 1(1).
Role of the patent claims in patent law(Part IV.)Scope and infringement of the patent protection, and the principle of equivalence.
It seems to me that the Commission ismisguided in arguing(if I have understood it correctly) that the principle of equivalence applies as between the respective periods available to the taxable person and to the tax authority.
As regards the principle of equivalence, the Court does not have before it any evidence which might raise doubts as to the compliance of the legislation at issue in the main proceedings with that principle. .
Unfortunately, this is not the situation today,and therefore we have the present proposal which aims at extending the principle of equivalence between a residence permit and short-stay visas to long-stay D visas.
The principle of equivalence requires equal treatment between comparable claims based on national law, on the one hand, and on EU law, on the other, not equivalence between different forms of procedure under national law.
In particular, the detailed procedural rules may not be lessfavourable than those governing similar domestic situations(principle of equivalence) and they may not render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights.
The principle of equivalence does not therefore preclude a six-month limitation period for applications for review such as, for example, the one provided for in Paragraph 332(2) and(3) of the BVergG 2006, even if under national law the general limitation period for claims for damages is longer.
Einstein's use of the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass to derive his principle of equivalence, and eventually all of general relativity, amounts to a relentless march of logical reasoning unmatched in the history of human thought.
The principle of equivalence is an expression of the general principle of equal treatment and nondiscrimination, which requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and that different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified. 31.
However, these domestic requirements should not be lessfavourable than those governing similar domestic actions(principle of equivalence), nor should they render the exercise of the Union right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult(principle of effectiveness).
As regards the principle of equivalence, it does not appear from the file, nor has it been argued before the Court, that the limitation period provided for in Article 19(1) of the DPR No 633/72 does not comply with that principle. .
As pointed out in the written observations of the Commission, if Romanian law also supplies an exception to res judicata in the light of subsequent case-law of the Constitutional Court challenging the correctness of prior judicial rulings(and traversing all domestic jurisdictions)(50)then the principle of equivalence might well dictate that the same is to applied to Court rulings concerning EU law.
In those circumstances,such legislation cannot be regarded as infringing the principle of equivalence in that it does not allow a consumer protection association to intervene in proceedings for enforcement of a final arbitration award, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.
It concludes that the principle of equivalence has not been complied with on accountof the fact that the legislation at issue in the main proceedings allows a period of four years to the tax authority for reassessments and recovery, whereas it provides for a period of only two years for deduction of VAT paid.
In accordance with the preceding remarks, therefore, both the principle of effectiveness and the principle of equivalence would be infringed if fixedterm workers such as the complainants were directed to seek legal redress in the ordinary Irish courts in respect of the period prior to 14 July 2003 and were denied access to the Irish labour courts.
In accordance with the principle of equivalence, national rules and procedures relating to actions for damages resulting from infringements of Article 101 or 102 TFEU shall not be less favourable to the alleged injured parties than those governing similar actions for damages resulting from infringements of national law.
While I admit that this may lead the discussion outside of the scope of the preliminary reference,(52)in my opinion the principle of equivalence is not complied with if a later decisionof the national Constitutional Court can lead to revision of an earlier final civil judgment, and thus enable recovery of unduly levied tax when a judgment of the Court cannot.
The principle of equivalence precludes national rules which allow for revisionof national judicial decisions delivered in civil proceedings because of a later judgment of the national Constitutional Court or the European Court of Human Rights, but do not allow for this with respect to a later judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
However, those rules must not be lessfavourable than those governing similar domestic actions(principle of equivalence); nor may they be framed in such a way as to make it in practice impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred by Community law(principle of effectiveness)(see, inter alia, Kapferer, paragraph 22, and Fallimento Olimpiclub, paragraph 24).
Still referring to the principle of equivalence, the Court adds that‘where, pursuant to rules of national law, the administration is required to withdraw an administrative decision which has become final if that decision is manifestly incompatible with domestic law, that same obligation must exist if the decision is manifestly incompatible with Community law'.