Examples of using First applicant in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
Call the first applicant.
The first applicant shall be deemed to be entitled to the Community plant variety right pursuant to Article 11.
Show in the first applicant.
The first applicant also emphasized to the prosecution the significance of Article 2 of the Convention in the context of the Katyń investigation No. 159.
Send in the first applicant, please.
On 7 December 2005 the Consular Section of the Polish Embassy in Moscow conveyed the reply of the Chief Military Prosecutor' Office to the motion of the first applicant, Ms Witomiła Wołk-Jezierska, of 25 October 2005.
Jeremiah is our first applicant from Quest, a new school in New Hampshire.
Mrs. Litzer. Send in the first applicant.
Prescreen is the first applicant tracking system that uses innovative matching technology to help you quickly find the most suitable candidate.
Mrs. Litzer. Send in the first applicant, please.
According to the first applicant, Article 2 of the Convention required that an efficient investigation be conducted, all circumstances of the crime brought to light and the results of the investigation be revealed for the purpose of punishing the perpetrators.
They don't mingle, butthey would be the first applicants for an open position.
This shall not apply if, before a decision on the application is taken, the Office is aware, or it is shown by a final judgment delivered with regard to a claim for entitlement pursuant to Article 98(4), that entitlement is not oris not solely vested in the first applicant.
Unless the applicant has agreed with the first applicant that use may be made of such information; or.
The protection applies to test and study reports submitted to a Member State by an applicant for authorisation under this Regulation(hereinafter called‘the first applicant'), provided that those test and study reports were.
On 1 February 2006 the Consular Section conveyed to the first applicant, Witomiła Wołk-Jezierska, the response of the Chief Military Prosecutor's Office dated 18 January 2006.
Under specific circumstances in order to stimulate research and development within the agri-food industry, and thus innovation, the newly developed scientific evidence andproprietary data provided in support of an application for inclusion of a novel food in the Community list should not be used to the benefit of another applicant during a limited period of time, without the agreement of the first applicant.
Fees due pursuant to Article 83 of the Basic Regulation and already paid by the first applicant shall be deemed to have been paid by the subsequent applicant. .
Data protection under paragraph 1 shall only be granted where the first applicant has claimed data protection at the time of submitting the dossier or further information submitted in accordance with Article 36(1) and has provided to the Member State concerned for each test or study report the following information.
The Sozialgericht takes the view that the two applicants did not, at the material time,benefit from the specific guarantees in favour of‘workers' since the‘brief minor' professional activity of the first applicant, Mr Vatsouras,‘did not ensure him a livelihood' and the activity pursued by Mr Koupatantze‘lasted barely more than one month.
Data protection under paragraph 1 shall only be granted where the first applicant has claimed data protection at the time of submitting the dossier and has provided to the Member State concerned for each test or study report the following information.
On 25 October 2005 the first applicant, Ms Witomiła Wołk-Jezierska, having in mind the conclusion of Katyń investigation No. 159 and the fact that the decision in the matter had supposedly been classified, petitioned the Chief Military Prosecutor's Office for information on the future of the Katyń investigation and for a copy of the decision on its discontinuation, and if the decision had indeed been classified- for its reconsideration.
Where entitlement to a Community plant variety right is validly transferred to another person for the purposes of the Office,that person may pursue the application of the first applicant as if it were his own, provided that he gives notice to this effect to the Office within one month of the entry of final judgment in the Register of Applications for Community plant variety rights.
In addressing her letter of 25 October 2005 to the prosecution, the first applicant was motivated by the wish to obtain information about the future of the Katyń investigation, and to receive a copy of the decision on its discontinuation or, in the event that it had been classified, to have the decision reconsidered.
In its letter of 7 December 2005 the Consular Section of the Polish Embassy in Moscow also advised the first applicant that it would ask the Chief Military Prosecutor's Office for an explanation concerning the rehabilitation of Wincenty Wołk, which matter was to be resolved after the conclusion of Katyń investigation No. 159.
In its letter dated 23 November 2005 the Chief Military Prosecutor's Office informed the first applicant that the decision on the discontinuation of the Katyń investigation contained state secrets and for that reason, in compliance with Chapter 6 of the Law on State Secrets and Article 2 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters the document was not subject to publication and could not be handed over to the Polish side.
First time applicant- not VIS registered.
Salzgitter AG, represented by J. Sedemund and T. Lübbig,Rechtsanwälte, applicant at first instance.
Marie-Claude Girardot, represented by C. Bernard-Glanz and S. Rodrigues,avocats, applicant at first instance.
First, the applicant considers that it is incorrect to state that the ingredients and production methods of beers and wines are different.