Examples of using Contested decisions in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Review and decide the request to suspend contested decisions.
This board contested decisions from both the congress of Lisbon and the regency of D. Pedro, located in Rio de Janeiro.
The Civil Service Tribunal accordingly annulled the contested decisions.
Since the contested decisions were addressed to the Netherlands Government, it must be considered, in the first place, whether they are of individual concern to the applicants.
Therefore, the Commission was not competent to adopt the contested decisions.
In those circumstances, the Court concludes that the contested decisions must be annulled in so far as they concern Mr Sison and Al-Aqsa, respectively.
In those circumstances, because the Commission significantly failed to fulfil its procedural obligations,the General Court has annulled the contested decisions.
In the case in point, the Court stated that it was apparent from the wording of the contested decisions that the aid in question was actually intended for the building of ships in Belgian yards.
In that respect, the General Court takes the view that, if the Commission had complied with those rules,the result of the procedure or the content of the contested decisions could have been substantially different.
The communications provided for in Article 3 of the contested decisions must inform resellers that in application of this Order the exclusive purchasing agreements may be relied upon against Langnese and Schöl1er;
ANF-Lingen is ordered to pay the costs,including those incurred in respect of the applications for the immediate implementation of the contested decisions and the forwarding of the report of the persons responsible for its administration.
By its interim judgment the Court of First Instance annulled the two contested decisions on the ground that the Commission had not demonstrated that it had properly examined the merits of Mrs Girardot's application in relation to each of the posts in question before rejecting it and, correspondingly, before accepting the application of other candidates paragraph 83 of the interim judgment.
However, given the overriding importance of the protection of civilian populations in Syria andthe derogations provided for by the contested decisions(periodic review of the decision by the Council), the General Court holds that the restrictions are not disproportionate.
In that regard, the General Court finds that the addition in the drafts of the contested decisions of a statement of reasons referring to a new opinion of the EFSA by way of scientific foundation constitutes a substantial alteration to those drafts in relation to their previous version.
By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 18 January 2002 Mrs Girardot brought an action seeking annulment of the Commission's two decisions dated 13 and 15 March 2001 rejecting her application for eight permanent posts to be paid from research andinvestment appropriations(‘the contested decisions') and the consequent annulment of the eight decisions by the Commission appointing third parties to those posts.
In its judgment delivered today, the General Court has found, first of all, that the Commission,before adopting the contested decisions, did not submit the amended drafts of those decisions, together with the EFSA's consolidated opinion of 2009 and the minority opinions, to the competent committees.
Furthermore, while the Court, in its order in Portugal v Commission, cited at paragraph 28 above, declared the action inadmissible,it based its decision on the fact that the Portuguese Republic had requested the annulment of the contested decisions only in so far as it was designated in them as an addressee, a designation which the Court held to be superfluous and without independent legal effect paragraphs 25 and 28.
In consequence, the General Court finds that, by having decided to request a consolidated opinion from the EFSA,and by basing the contested decisions on, inter alia, that opinion without allowing the competent committees to comment on the opinion or on the amended draft decisions, the Commission departed from the rules of the authorisation procedures.
The Court noted that, in the judgments in Control Data ν Commission, Van Gend& Loos and Bosman ν Commission. it had already rejected that plea, which was submitted in the same legal context.The Court held in those judgments that the procedure according to which the contested decisions were adopted, which involved different stages, some at the national level and some at the Community level, afforded interested parties all the necessary legal guarantees. The Court held as follows.
In the context of his action for annulment, the applicant requested the Court to carry out measures of inquiry to clarify the circumstances in which the contested decisions were adopted and, more specifically, to determine in what circumstances the ECB came into possession of the report of the Monetary Committee, and to order the ECB to add to the documents before the Court the minutes of the meeting of the Governing Council of 21 October 1999.
The contested decision contains a transitional provision which states.
Thus, the contested decision cannot be regarded as invalid on that ground.
The validity of the contested decision in the light of the obligation to state reasons.
The operative part of the contested decision is worded as follows.
Consequently, the contested decision must be annulled.
The contested decision was therefore disproportionate and consequently illegal.
The contested decision must therefore be annulled.
According to the case-law, the contested decision is therefore not an actionable measure.
Contested decision.
On 19 October 1994,the Commission adopted the contested decision.
