Examples of using Contested decisions in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
III- The contested decisions.
I shall examine the two actions in the order in which the contested decisions were adopted.
The contested decisions must therefore be annulled.
Finally, according to the Commission,the Council breached the principle of proportionality when adopting the contested decisions.
Annul the contested decisions in whole or in part;
The scope of judicial review determines hownational judges will assess the legality of contested decisions, acts and omissions.
I shall examine the two contested decisions in the chronological order in which they were adopted.
In those circumstances, because the Commission significantly failed to fulfil its procedural obligations,the General Court has annulled the contested decisions.
Order compensation of the pecuniary and non-pecuniary harm caused by the contested decisions; in the alternative award the applicant the sum of EUR 13 306;
According to the Court, the Member States concerned did not make any specificcommitments concerning the aid schemes authorised by the contested decisions.
This interpretation can apply in respect of other contested decisions, acts and omissions covered by Article 9(2) of the Aarhus Convention.
As to the substance, the applicant claimsthat the wrongful maladministration lies, in the present case, in the illegality vitiating the contested decisions.
In those circumstances, the Court concludes that the contested decisions must be annulled in so far as they concern Mr Sison and Al-Aqsa.
The scope of judicial review is a key element of an effective system of judicial review as it determines hownational judges will assess the legality of contested decisions, acts and omissions.
In its actions, the Commission also maintains that the contested decisions were adopted in breach of the principle of sincere cooperation between the institutions.
The contested decisions do not explain how the ex ante contribution was in fact calculated, thereby prejudicing the effective application of the review of the legality and validity of the decision by the applicant.
They can extend from afocus on procedural issues to a full review of contested decisions, acts or omissions, with a possibility for judges to replace the findings of the administration with their own assessment.
The judicial review provided for under Article 9(2) of the Aarhus Convention- and under the EU secondary legislation transposing it-is required to assess the substantive and procedural legality of contested decisions, acts and omissions.
Finally, according to the applicants, the contested decisions also infringe the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations, the protection of acquired rights and equal treatment.
Deutsche Bahn submits that the General Court erred in law in holding that, in the light of the existence inEU law of a post-inspection judicial review, the contested decisions did not disregard the fundamental right to effective judicial protection.
Last, the applicants argue that in taking the contested decisions the DVZ did not weigh up the interests in each case in the context of Article 8 of the ECHR and Article 7 of the Charter.
Given that national practices vary so hugely,as reflected in the differing rates of acceptance of applications and the level of contested decisions and secondary movements, the implicit principle of solidarity between Member States is not being applied.
Consequently, by imposing in the contested decisions allowance ceilings above which the NAP would be regarded as incompatible with the assessment criteria, the Commission substituted itself, in practice, for the Member States concerned.
Owing to asymmetric pressures on Member States,as reflected in the differing rates of acceptance of applications and the level of contested decisions and secondary movements, the implicit principle of solidarity between Member States is however not being applied.
By adopting the contested decisions, the Council had taken into consideration the substantial change in circumstances linked to the effects in 2008 and 2009 of the economic and financial crisis on those States' agricultural sectors.
In the aftermath of the inspections, Deutsche Bahn brought actions against the Commission before theGeneral Court for annulment of the three inspection decisions(‘the contested decisions') on the grounds that they infringed Deutsche Bahn's right to privacy, its right to effective judicial protection, the rights of the defence and the principle of proportionality.
Declare Delegated Regulation(EU) No 2015/63, on which the contested decisions are based, incompatible with the principle of freedom to conduct a business recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
Declare Annex I to Delegated Regulation(EU) No 2015/63, on which the contested decisions are based, incompatible with the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and legal certainty recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
In their action, the applicants submit, first, that the contested decisions infringe the legal framework formed by the notice for the competition which they passed, and Articles 5, 29 and 31 of the Staff Regulations, the principle that officials should have reasonable career prospects and the principle of proportionality.
By its interim judgment the Court of First Instance annulled the two contested decisions on the ground that the Commission had not demonstrated that it had properly examined the merits of Mrs Girardot's application in relation to each of the posts in question before rejecting it and, correspondingly, before accepting the application of other candidates(paragraph 83 of the interim judgment).