Examples of using Haparanda in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
It borders the Swedish municipality of Haparanda in.
Free bus transportation from Haparanda- Luleå in Länstrafiken in Norrboten on county busses.
We are a finnish family living in the finnish-swedish border close to Haparanda.
It borders the Swedish municipality of Haparanda in Finnish: Haaparanta.
The questions referred by the Haparanda tingsrätt are particularly complex and are just as difficult as the issue which I dealt with above.
You can't reach Finland by train,however the bus connection from Lulea via Tornio/Haparanda to Kemi is included in Eurail.
I, on the other hand will bike in Haparanda(which I did today) and in 3 more weeks I will bike in Ystad.
The best options to reach the country are the ferries from Stockholm to Turku and Helsinki andthe bus connection from Lulea via Tornio/Haparanda to Kemi.
Free bus transportation from Kemi/Tornio- Haparanda(Sweden) operated by Veljekset Salmela.
In the light of the arguments set out in points 48 to 64 of this Opinion,I propose that the Court should declare that it lacks jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred by the Haparanda tingsrätt.
Another important bus link is the line from Lulea via Tornio/Haparanda in Finland, linking the Swedish and Finnish rail networks.
However, if the Court decides that it does have jurisdiction to give a ruling on the substance of the case, I propose, in the alternative,to reply below to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Haparanda tingsrätt.
It is in those circumstances that the Haparanda tingsrätt decided to stay proceedings and refer the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Finnish and Meänkieli can be used in the northernmost municipalities of Gällivare, Haparanda, Kiruna, Pajala and Övertorneå and its immediate neighbourhood.
The Haparandabanan line is a missing linkIt is a mature project that involves the upgrading and new construction of railways on the Swedish side in order to raise the standard, anda rational track gauge shifting facility at the national border in Haparanda- Torneå.
As I stated above, the second, third, fourth andfifth questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Haparanda tingsrätt concern the interpretation of Article 50 of the Charter.
On 23 December 2010, the Haparanda tingsrätt stayed the criminal proceedings brought against Mr Fransson, finding that there was a link with Union law, specifically Article 50 of the Charter which enshrines the fundamental right of ne bis in idem.
When I was a little boy we had a celebritycalled"Stålfarfar"(tr.“Granddaddy made of steel”) who became famous by biking from Haparanda in the far north to Ystad in the far south.
On 27 December 2010, the reference for a preliminary ruling from the Haparanda tingsrätt was received at the Registry of the Court; the questions referred are worded as follows.
Other amendments introduce significant modifications which have not been assessed by the Van Miert Group, such as the Marseilles-Turin railway line, referred to in Amendment No 19, and which has been rejected;the same is the case with the Haparanda line, referred to in Amendment No 47.
The Haparanda tingsrätt also refers to the application of the‘clear support' criterion to the rights protected by the Charter, in particular Article 50 thereof. In this instance, the question does not concern the relationship between the ECHR and Union law but rather Union law alone.
Question 5 38 By its fifth question, the Haparanda tingsrätt asks the Court, in essence, whether national legislation which allows the same court to impose tax penalties in combination with criminal penalties in the event of tax evasion is compatible with the ne bis in idem principle guaranteed by Article 50 of the Charter.
The Haparanda tingsrätt has given details of case-law of the Swedish Supreme Court, according to which, before disapplying a Swedish provision which is incompatible with the ECHR, there must be clear support either in the convention itself or in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
By these questions, to which it is appropriate to give a joint reply, the Haparanda tingsrätt asks the Court, in essence, whether the ne bis in idem principle laid down in Article 50 of the Charter should be interpreted as precluding criminal proceedings for tax evasion from being brought against a defendant where a tax penalty has already been imposed upon him for the same acts of providing false information.
By its first question, the Haparanda tingsrätt asks the Court, in essence, whether a national judicial practice is compatible with European Union law if it makes the obligation for a national court to disapply any provision contrary to a fundamental right guaranteed by the ECHR and by the Charter conditional upon that infringement being clear from the instruments concerned or the case-law relating to them.
