Examples of using Harmonisation should in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
This harmonisation should be emphasised.
With this objective in mind, therefore,the Committee believes that harmonisation should be suitably targeted.
This harmonisation should increase the availability of products in the Union.
Consumer representatives state that Tthe level of harmonisation should be minimum, with all the necessary consequences for the regime.
Harmonisation should be based on"best practices" and not on an average European level.
Regulatory impact assessments(RIAs) when preparing national negotiating positions and legal harmonisation should be carried out in order to identify adjustment risks.
Harmonisation should not be based on the lowest common denominator of protection.
This does not mean that, in a case-by-case examination, in very specific areas in which completion of the internalmarket is the prime concern, the possibility of maximum harmonisation should not be considered, provided that a higher level of consumer protection is ensured, possibly through regulation.
The level of harmonisation should be minimum, with all the necessary consequences for the regime.
Harmonisation should therefore be based on"best practices" and not on an average European level.
For practical reasons, harmonisation should focus initially only on the measures aimed at companies;
Harmonisation should be implemented around a body of standards sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Directive.
In the South, regulatory convergence and harmonisation should be sought in line with the Regional Transport Action Plan 2014-2020 addressing maritime, aviation, rail, road and urban transport.
Harmonisation should be limited to requirements necessary to guarantee that the promotion and development of new electronic communications services and networks between Member States are not hindered.
The scope of the harmonisation should therefore be extended in order to include recycled and organic materials.
This harmonisation should precede the establishment of any other form of European de-certification threshold.
The ambition level of harmonisation should be high enough to ensure a fairer system for compensating for damages and to improve accident prevention.
Such harmonisation should, for the purposes of trade, eliminate the inconveniences resulting from differences between national standards.
There is wide agreement that harmonisation should focus on what is really necessary, and that it is not realistic to aim for too much harmonisation in a European Union of 27 states.
This harmonisation should be achieved by the application in every National Single Window of a common interface software for system-to-system exchange of information developed at Union level.
The level of this harmonisation should aim to ensure not only fairer compensation for loss or damage, but also improved accident prevention.
Harmonisation should on no account be used to push down the levels of protection currently provided in Member States but should serve to improve legislation in those Member States where protection is inadequate.
For all four options 2-5,it was also examined whether the harmonisation should be mandatory for all products with a given function, or whether fertilisers could comply with the harmonised legislation on an optional basis, as an alternative to any applicable national legislation and mutual recognition, as is the case under status quo for inorganic fertilisers.
Steps to achieve harmonisation should primarily involve defining the concept and qualitative and quantitative parameters of the phenomenon in order to secure full information and proper observation of the underlying social circumstances, in identical terms throughout Europe- and ideally, throughout the world- based on the compilation and processing of comparable statistical data, which will help define an economic framework for quantifying this data.
Therefore, full harmonisation should only be used on those aspects necessary to achieve a consistent framework for cross-border transactions, in order to add value.
He believes that full harmonisation should be considered selectively, i.e. in specific technical cases only, where the different national provisions in place up to now are genuinely and demonstrably placing a burden on cross-border businesses.
If so, in what direction should such harmonisation go?
This harmonisation exercise should cover veterinary medicinal products authorised before 2004.18.
Also in principle the IAEA and the EU should seek harmonisation of international standards.
The MAH should ensure harmonisation between terminology used in the brochures and the product information.