Examples of using Any statement obtained in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Any statement obtained by violent means shall be null and void.
The State should explicitly prohibit the use as evidence in judicial proceedings of any statement obtained through torture;
Any statement obtained by means of force is null and void.
Please provide information on measures explicitly prohibiting the use as evidence in judicial proceedings of any statement obtained through torture.
Any statement obtained by violent means shall be null and void.
Alkarama indicated that the rule in the Code of Criminal Procedure that any statement obtained by torture is rendered void was not respected.
Any statement obtained by means of force is null and void" emphasis added.
The absence in Brazilian legislation of an explicit prohibition on any statement obtained through torture being accepted as evidence in judicial proceedings.
Any statement obtained by violent means shall be null and void our underlining.
The State party should amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to explicitly prohibit the use of any statement obtained by torture as a form of evidence in judicial proceedings.
Prohibition of any statement obtained under torture from being invoked as evidence.
The State party should amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to explicitly prohibit the use of any statement obtained as a result of torture as a form of evidence in judicial proceedings.
Any statement obtained in violation of this principle is null, and the responsible parties are liable to the penalties set by law.
Adopt clear legal provisions prohibiting the use as evidence of any statement obtained under torture and establishing that orders from a superior may not be invoked as a justification of torture;
Any statement obtained by coercion was inadmissible, and failure to respect procedural safeguards rendered the investigation null and void.
This principle is confirmed by article 166 of the Criminal Procedure Act,which stipulates:“Any statement obtained in breach of this principle shall be null and void, without prejudice to any criminal liability that may be incurred”.
Any statement obtained in violation of this provision is null and void, and those responsible for the violation shall be punished in accordance with the law”.
A member of the Committee had asked why the exclusion rule had been relative,whereas article 15 of the Convention provided that any statement obtained as a result of torture could not be invoked as evidence in any proceedings.
Any statement obtained in violation of this provision is null and void, and those responsible for the violation shall be punished in accordance with the law.”.
In the context of the ongoing reform of the Criminal Code, incorporate a provision prohibiting any statement obtained under torture from being invoked as evidence in any proceedings, in conformity with article 15 of the Convention;
Any statement obtained by an immigration officer that are not made voluntarily, including a statement that has been obtained coercively, is inadmissible in criminal proceedings.
How does the State party implement the provision in article 15 of the Convention prohibiting the use of any statement obtained as a result of torture as evidence in any proceedings, except against the alleged torturer?
It further stipulates that any statement obtained through the breach of any of these provisions shall be null and void, and that those responsible shall be subject to the penalties established by law.
In any event, the law established clearly that the prosecution must prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the suspecthad confessed entirely of his or her own accord and that any statement obtained by coercion or in violation of the suspect's constitutional rights must be declared inadmissible.
Criminal Code subsection 269.1(4),which bars the use of any statement obtained by torture for any purpose except as evidence that it was in fact obtained by torture, applies in full to all of the new procedures.
Referring to its most recent concluding observations, the Committee once again urges the State party to review its legislation in order to incorporate a provision prohibiting any statement obtained under torture from being invoked as evidence in any proceedings, in conformity with article 15 of the Convention.
Many States apparently took the view that torture could be assimilated to other offences, such as striking and wounding, without regard for the specific nature of the offence and of the various circumstances thatmight accompany it and for the corresponding obligations, the most important of which was the prohibition on invoking as evidence any statement obtained as a result of torture.
Ms. WEDGWOOD noted that the Convention against Torture provided that any statement obtained under torture was inadmissible, but did not say anything about statements obtained through other treatment prohibited by article 7 of the Covenant.
Concerning the admissibility of evidence, article 151, paragraph 4, of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that any evidence obtained by illegal means was inadmissible and the Constitutional Court, in its decision No. 14of 3 May 2011, had ruled that any statement obtained through violence was inadmissible.
The Cuban Constitution prohibits the use of violence or coercion against individuals to force them to testify, and declares null and void any statement obtained in breach of this provision. Persons found guilty of such acts are liable to the penalties which criminal law establishes for cases categorized as offences.