Examples of using Average deployment in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Average deployment.
B Represents the revised planned average deployment based on the monthly schedule.
Lower average deployment of United Nations police personnel and the extension of the tour of duty of 155 police officers.
The unspent balance was due to the lower average deployment of corrections officers following the earthquake.
The lower number of civilian staff was attributable to adjustments made in recruitment activities to support a lower average deployment of military personnel.
People also translate
Lower average deployment than planned.
Additional requirements attributable to higher than budgeted average deployment of United Nations police officers.
The model allowed for the average deployment of 331 international staff,while the actual average deployment in UNMISS was 735 international staff.
Under United Nations police($8,313,300),proposed requirements are based on the average deployment of 182 police personnel;
The standardized funding model assumed an average deployment of 120 military observers; however, the actual average deployment in UNMISS was 154 military observers.
The additional requirements were partly offset by reduced requirements for reimbursements to troop-contributing Governments for selfsustainment,owing to the lower average deployment of military contingent personnel.
The unutilized balance was due mainly to the lower actual average deployment of United Nations police personnel(371) than planned 450.
Funding is based on an average deployment of approximately 602 civilian personnel(280 international, 274 national and 49 United Nations Volunteers personnel) over the 2013/14 period.
Under Government-provided personnel($784,200),estimates are based on an average deployment of 19 personnel see A/69/557, paras. 195-199.
The average deployment of formed civilian police observers during the period was 240, compared with the estimated average deployment of 265 personnel, which took into account the planned deployment of a 50-person marine unit in January 2001.
Lower requirements for military andpolice costs owing to the lower average deployment of contingent troops and formed police personnel;
The increased requirements were attributable primarily to the higher actual average monthly deployment of 119 international staff during the performance reporting period as compared with the budgeted average deployment of 87 international staff.
The application of vacancy rates is based on actual average deployment of personnel in the 2011/12 financial period and the first half of the 2012/13 financial period.
The reduced requirements were due mainly to lower expenditure for mission subsistence allowance,travel on emplacement and clothing allowance owing to a lower actual average deployment of United Nations police of 555 as compared with the budgeted 633.
The standardized funding model assumed an average deployment of 331 United Nations police; however, the actual average deployment in UNMISS was 455 United Nations police.
Reduced requirements for reimbursements to troop-contributing Governments for troop costs andcontingent-owned equipment, owing to the lower average deployment of military contingent personnel average of 11,911 personnel compared with the 12,750 planned.
Standardized funding model assumes average deployment of 331 United Nations police, compared to 455 in UNMISS projection, and average cost of emplacement higher in UNMISS projection than standardized funding model.
While the budget provided for the United Nations Volunteers establishment of 131 Volunteers, with the average deployment during the reporting period of 117 Volunteers, 220 Volunteers were retained.
The lower actual output was owing to the lower average deployment of 580 military observers during the period compared with the budgeted 625 military observers, restrictions in the area of operations imposed on UNMIS, and weather and road conditions during the rainy season.
The reduced requirements were due mainly to lower costs for mission subsistence and clothing allowances,as the actual average deployment of military observers was 139 as compared with the budgeted 166, with no delayed deployment factor.
The unutilized balance was attributable to the lower average deployment of 36 personnel, compared to the budgeted average deployment of 77 personnel, inclusive of 25 additional government-provided personnel(military justice experts) approved from January 2011, and delays in the deployment of the additional personnel.
The standardized funding model provided resources for an average of 124 United Nations Volunteers,while the actual average deployment in UNMISS was 260 international United Nations Volunteers and 16 national United Nations Volunteers.
While the provision was based on the average deployment of 1,320 civilian police(excluding formed police units), the average number of personnel deployed during the period was 1,169, resulting in lower requirements for mission subsistence allowance and clothing and equipment allowance.
Military observers($1.3 million), owing to a higher actual vacancy rate of 5.4 per cent as compared to the budgeted rate of 3 per cent, with an average deployment of 719 instead of the budgeted 737 military observers, as well as lower average rotation costs;
The additional requirements were also due to the actual 12-month average deployment of 70 civilian police, higher than the budgeted 60, in accordance with Security Council resolution 1436(2002), whereby the authorized strength was increased up to 170 civilian police.