Examples of using Committee cannot conclude in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that available domestic remedies were exhausted.
While the Committee stresses the importance of adequate public notice, based on the information provided by the communicant andthe Party concerned, the Committee cannot conclude that the Party concerned failed to comply with the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee cannot conclude that the requirement is not objective and reasonably justifiable.
For this reason, and bearing in mind that the complaint relates to acivil claim for compensation, albeit for torture, the Committee cannot conclude that the proceedings have been so unreasonably prolonged that the delay would exempt the authors from exhausting them.
However, the Committee cannot conclude that those errors point to a subjective lack of impartiality of the judge in this case.
On the other hand,on the basis of the chronology of judicial proceedings provided by the author himself, the Committee cannot conclude that Mr. Kalenga was denied his right, under article 9, paragraph 4, to take proceedings before a court of law.
Accordingly, the Committee cannot conclude that the persons deported were provided the effective right of appeal within the meaning of Article 4 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the argument submitted by the State party that the Committee is not a fourth instance cannot prevail, and the Committee cannot conclude that the State party's review of the case was fully satisfactory from the perspective of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee cannot conclude that the persons deported were provided the effective right of appeal within the meaning of Article 4 of the Convention.
Since the author has not provided any information to the effect that jury trials have been held in death-penalty cases in the Murmansk Region to substantiate a difference in treatment between him and other accused persons, the Committee cannot conclude that there has been a violation of his rights under article 26 of the Covenant.
In the absence of any further information, the Committee cannot conclude at the existence of a violation of article 14, paragraph 3 e.
The Committee cannot conclude that non-reporting is necessarily a question of lack of will or a lack of dedication in the fight against Al-Qaida and the Taliban.
In the absence of further information on this issue, the Committee cannot conclude that the European Community fails to comply with article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention.
Consequently, the Committee cannot conclude that the State party has violated Mr. Kholodov's rights under article 2, paragraph 3; article 6, paragraph 1, and article 19 of the Covenant.
In the absence of any further information the Committee cannot conclude at the existence of a violation of article 10, paragraph 2(a), of the Covenant.
Consequently, the Committee cannot conclude that the author has been denied the right to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher court in accordance with article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
After reviewing the material before it, the Committee cannot conclude that the proceedings against Mr. Simons suffered from such defects.
Consequently, the Committee cannot conclude that the author has been denied the right to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher court in accordance with article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
For that reason, on the basis of the information provided in this case, the Committee cannot conclude that Slovak law on public participation and EIA in general also fails to comply with article 6 of the Convention.
In the circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that the distinction made was not, at the time of Mr. Love's dismissal, based on objective and reasonable considerations.
On the basis of the information before it, the Committee cannot conclude that credible and genuine investigations have been carried out by the de facto authorities in the Gaza Strip.
Moreover, the Committee cannot conclude, on the basis of the available material, that the authors' representatives were unable to represent them adequately, nor that they displayed lack of professional judgement in the conduct of the defence of their clients.
Moreover, on the basis of the information available, the Committee cannot conclude that the fee required prevented the author from exhausting the remedy or that the review would be a priori ineffective.
Under such circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that the fact that the author's letter of 4 May 2010 has not reached it is attributable to the State party's authorities.
In these circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that article 14, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Covenant has been violated" annex IX, sect. C, para. 7.2.
Under these circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that the restrictions imposed on the authors' expression were incompatible with article 19, paragraph 3.
For the foregoing reasons, the Committee cannot conclude that the State party would violate article 7 of the Covenant if it removed the author to China.
In line with what was concluded above, the Committee cannot conclude that the Party concerned(United Kingdom) failed to comply with article 6, paragraph 6, of the Convention.
In such circumstances, the Committee cannot conclude that the State party's courts, by sentencing the author to life imprisonment, have violated his rights under article 15, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
In the light of the above, the Committee cannot conclude that the information before it shows that the author would face a real risk of treatment contrary to article 7 of the Covenant if removed to China.