Examples of using Minimum effect in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Specifies the minimum effects of a trust. Article 11.
Green box- measures that do not, or only to a minimum extent distort trade and minimum effect on production.
In the first one, the objection had only a minimum effect on treaty relations, in that it led to the partial non-application of the treaty.
Under article 21, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Conventions, bilateral relations in such cases are characterized in theory by the partial nonapplication of the treaty objection with minimum effect a.
Either"the provisions to which the reservation relates do not apply as between the reserving State or organization and the objecting State or organization to the extent of the reservation";this is the"minimum" effect of an objection;
Simple objections(or objections having"minimum effect") to reservations considered to be invalid are thus far from being a matter of mere speculation.
The short exposure to ambient air while being pulled out normally has only minimum effect on the surface oxidation of workpieces.
It was pointed out that the most frequent objection, the minimum effect objection, might not be covered by the definition given in the ninth report of the Special Rapporteur because, in practice, the effects of a minimum effect objection were the same as the effects expected of the reservation.
It was noted that,under the approach developed at the previous session, certain“minimum” effects would result more or less automatically from recognition.
Nonetheless, to align the draft with the solution proposed in the 1951 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, and in response to the criticisms andmisgivings expressed by many Commission members, the radical solution proposed by Waldock was abandoned in favour of a simple presumption of maximum effect, leaving minimum effect available as an option.
We consider it very important that our ways of thinking andacting would have a minimum effect on the environment we live in. This is why we make products that can be utilised for a long period of time.
The Conference Drafting Committee, chaired by Yasseen-- who, within the Commission, had expressed doubts regarding the difference between the respective effects of acceptance and objection on treaty relations,-- proposed an amended text for article 21, paragraph 3,in order to take account of the new presumption in favour of the minimum effect of an objection, which had been adopted following the Soviet amendment.
These objections thus had a much broader scope than that of objections with"minimum effect", without the authors of the objections stating that they were not bound by the treaty vis-à-vis the author of the reservation.
The second sentence of paragraph 2 of guideline 4.3.7 draws the consequence of the absence of such opposition within the stipulated time period by transposing the rule applicable to objections with"minimum" effect established in article 21, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Conventions and reproduced in guideline 4.3.
These objections thus had a much broader scope than that of objections with"minimum effect", yet the authors of the objections did not go so far as to state that they were not bound by the treaty vis-à-vis the author of the reservation.
During consideration of the report of the Commission on the work of its fifty-seventh session in 2005(A/60/10), Sweden,replying to the Commission's question regarding"minimum effect" objections based on the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty, expressly maintained this position.
This example is far from isolated.There are numerous objections with"minimum effect" which, in spite of the conviction expressed by their authors as to the impermissibility of the reservation, do not oppose the entry into force of the treaty and say so clearly, while also expressly indicating, at times, that only the provisions to which the reservation relates shall not apply in the relations between the two States.
Furthermore, the International Court of Justice, in its 1951 advisory opinion, pointed out on the issue of reservations with minimum effect that such dialogue was inherent in the flexible system and was the corollary of the very principle of consensus.
The effects of objections could vary from a minimum effect, in which the provisions to which the reservation related did not apply as between the reserving State or organization and the objecting State or organization to the extent of the reservation, to a maximum effect, in which the treaty did not enter into force between the objecting State or organization and the reserving State or organization.
Under article 21, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Conventions, bilateral relations in such cases result in principle in the partial non-application of the treaty objections with minimum effect, the consequences of which are complex and can vary depending on the content of the reservation, are described in guideline 4.3.6.
In particular, it is apparent from established practice that there is an intermediate stage between the"minimum" effect of the objection, as envisaged by this provision, and the"maximum" effect, which results from the intention expressed by the author of the objection of preventing the treaty from entering into force between itself and the author of the reservation, in accordance with the provisions of article 20, paragraph 4 b.
With those units, as with all those involved in the treaty body secretariat,OHCHR constantly sought to find solutions which would ensure that savings had the minimum effect on the treaty bodies' work; however, such efforts did not always produce a satisfactory compromise.
This example is far from isolated;there are numerous objections with"minimum effect" which, in spite of the conviction expressed by their authors as to the impermissibility of the reservation, do not oppose the entry into force of the treaty.
However, with respect to draftguideline 2.6.1(Definition of objections to reservations), he noted that the most frequent objection, the minimum effect objection, might not be covered by the definition given in the ninth report of the Special Rapporteur(A/CN.4/544) because, in practice, the effects of a minimum effect objection were the same as the effects expected of the reservation.
Low pressure drop due to minimum transition effect.
Effect of minimum wage on informal employment.
The statutory national minimum wage took effect on 1 April 1999.
The measurement of the impact of coercive economic measures requires adequate methodologies for measurement andcriteria for judging the minimum requisite effect of such measures;