Examples of using Noted that draft article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was noted that draft article 20 had already been adopted A/CN.9/447, paras. 103-121.
In response to another question, the Working Group noted that draft article 9 would generally apply to any form requirements under the applicable law.
It was noted that draft article 9 was based largely on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce, which set out criteria to recognize the functional equivalence between data messages and paper documents.
The Working Group noted that draft article 6 corresponded to draft article 9 of A/CN.9/WG. III/WP.56.
It was noted that draft article 14 had already been adopted by the Working Group A/CN.9/447, paras. 17-24 and 161.
Furthermore, it was noted that draft article 1 provided an autonomous scope of application for the draft convention.
It was noted that draft article 15 had already been adopted by the Working Group A/CN.9/447, paras. 25-40 and 161.
In this respect, it was noted that draft article 2.3 provided that notices might be made using electronic communications.
It was noted that draft article 37 related to matters addressed in draft article 25 4.
It was noted that draft article 19 originated from a provision establishing the requirements of control.
It was noted that draft article 20 made the maritime performing party subject to the same liabilities imposed on the carrier.
Finally, it was noted that draft article 5 referred only to obligations to cooperate that already existed under international law.
The Working Group noted that draft article 10 contained a non-exhaustive list of factors to be taken into account in determining trustworthiness.
The Working Group noted that draft article 5 corresponded to the text contained in draft article 8 of the text contained in A/CN.9/WG. III/WP.56.
For example, it was noted that draft article 9 ruled out the possibility of dual nationality for corporations, although such corporations existed in certain countries.
It was noted that draft article 6 represented a compromise text and caution was expressed about reopening matters settled in that provision.
In that regard, he noted that draft article 3 both recognized the sovereign right of States to expel aliens and limited that right under international law.
It was noted that draft article 17ter originated in the version of draft article 7 contained in document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.96 hereinafter referred to as“old article 7”.
It was further noted that draft article 5 referred not only to party autonomy but also to privity of contract, which should be reflected in the title of the draft article. .
It was noted that draft article 42 set up a system through which the carrier could qualify information referred to in draft article 38 in the contract particulars.
It was also noted that draft article x contained provisions that applied equally to non-negotiable transport documents and to transfer of rights in goods by way of transferable bills of lading.
It was noted that draft article 7 of the third proposal provided that an ODR administrator would present options to the parties should they fail to reach a facilitated settlement.
In that context, it was noted that draft article 3 provided a definition of"transfer" of an electronic transferable record that meant the transfer of control over an electronic transferable record.
In that respect it was noted that draft article 31 contained an obligation on the shipper to provide accurate information in a timely manner(paragraph 1) and to guarantee the accuracy of that information paragraph 2.
It was noted that draft article 15(e), with the additional language of"and facilities in a format that is accessible to and in plain language" could be considered in future discussion on draft article 19.
It was noted that draft article 2 provided a general rule of interpretation, according to which periods of time stipulated in the Rules"begin to run on the day following the day when a notice, notification, communication or proposal is received.
The Special Rapporteur noted that draft article 3 was the primary article because it was based on the central proposition that the outbreak of an armed conflict does not ipso facto terminate or suspend the operation of treaties.
By way of contrast, it was noted that draft article 46 dealt with the period before the carrier was able to make delivery, but that it was focussed on a time at which the carrier no longer had any responsibilities pursuant to the contract of carriage.
It was also noted that draft article 13 provided that a person's consent would be required for the use of electronic transferable records, and therefore the purpose of draft article 5 might already be achieved through draft article 13.
On the latter point,it was noted that draft article F as revised by the Working Group also did not address legal effect or validity of the signature and the form of these two draft articles was therefore consistent.