Examples of using Party also notes in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In this context, the State party also notes that the incidents complained of occurred in July 1984.
The State party also notes the second complainant's own assertion that she had left Yemen for the sole purpose of following and accompanying her husband.
In this context, the State party also notes that the conditions of the alternative civil service were less onerous than that of military service.
The State party also notes that the author has not provided information about the extent or nature of the alleged mistakes in translation.
The State party also notes that the advocate for persons without legal capacity was never informed.
The State party also notes that the parents and girlfriend of the alleged victim stated exactly the contrary.
The State party also notes that after the author's departure, his wife continued to use the forfeited property.
The State party also notes that the complainant first visited Canada on 23 June 1998 to attend his father's funeral.
The State party also notes that the communication had been submitted under the 1503 procedure and discontinued.
The State party also notes that the date of issue on the clipping is printed in a different typeface, which could indicate a montage.
The State party also notes that at no time during the proceedings did the complainant provide any details regarding the alleged torture.
The State party also notes that the author could have initiated judicial proceedings to request compensation for damages and harm.
The State party also notes that a similar service is provided by the Emergency Services(Ambulance) in the regions CAT/C/GEO/CO/3/Add.1.
The State party also notes that the author did not allege a violation of the right to a second hearing either in his cassation appeal or in his application for amparo.
The State party also notes that, according to international reports, many of the individuals who were arrested due to their alleged involvement in the party have been released.
The State party also notes that first mention of the alleged violation of article 24 was made in the grounds for the application for judicial review of 18 April 2007.
In this context, the State party also notes that the authors have failed to provide specific information about their children, and how the current system violates their rights.
The State party also notes that the author waited 18 months after Quebec had filed a response, i.e., until 17 February 2004, to file a further amended statement with the Court.
The State party also notes that the author is making unsupported allegations against the Danish authorities and individual officials at all levels of the domestic proceedings.
The State party also notes that the author had been aware of the content of the report since 1996, and thus had had sufficient time to bring evidence in his favour before the court.
The State party also notes that the author challenges the constitutionality of the provisions regulating the election process of the deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.
The State party also notes that the complainant has submitted to the CRA a letter dated 8 November 2001, issued by the Police Department of Vitebsk, according to which the complainant was not sought in Belarus.
The State party also notes that the guidelines on compensation of wrongfully convicted and imprisoned persons are currently being revised, and that it will inform the Committee of any development.
The State party also notes that the author has failed to provide comments on the State party's merits observations, in spite of the fact that several reminders were sent to her in this regard.
The State party also notes that the author has all the legal remedies available to him, such as those concerning his visitation rights(art. 95), or the proceedings to suspend home custody(art. 70 to 81).
The State party also notes that three separate sets of proceedings concerned the author regarding finance-related criminal acts constituting serious crimes under the law article 8 of the Criminal Code.
The State party also notes that as of September 2007, the author has not sought any information from the Head Investigation Office of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation about the investigation.
The State party also notes that in a similar case, Mohammed Hassan Gelle v. Denmark, the State party did not pay any compensation and the Committee found the State party's reply satisfactory.
The State party also notes that the document in question is contradictory, because the first paragraph states that the complainant is charged and, according to the second paragraph, she was sentenced to one month in prison.
The State party also notes that the Russian Federation is a party to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and is therefore bound to respect its provisions.