Examples of using Persons protocol in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Trafficking in Persons Protocol has a total of 159 parties.
Please describe challenges by your country in the implementation of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol provisions.
The Trafficking in Persons Protocol mentions only one such category-- children.
Decides also that, for its second session,the programme of work with respect to the Trafficking in Persons Protocol will be as follows.
Crime.4 The Trafficking in Persons Protocol currently has 169 parties and the Smuggling of Migrants Protocol 142 parties.
People also translate
Wael Abou el Magd discussed the challenges that Egypt had faced in incorporating the Trafficking in Persons Protocol into Egyptian domestic law.
By fully implementing the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, Member States can embrace a comprehensive approach to trafficking in persons. .
Invited States to take measures to discourage the demand that fostered all forms of exploitation consistent with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol;
Trafficking in persons, as defined by the Trafficking in Persons Protocol requires an act, means and a purpose.
The Trafficking in Persons Protocol contains measures with regards to judicial cooperation and information exchange among States Parties.
The International Framework for Action to Implement the Trafficking in Persons Protocol suggests the following implementation measures relating to exploitation.
Below are some national examples of various forms of exploitation that explicitly mention forms of exploitation that the Trafficking in Persons Protocol does not mention specifically.
Article 14 of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol takes note of the existence of other international instruments in interpreting the Protocol. .
As at 3 February 2010, the Convention had 153 States parties, the Trafficking in Persons Protocol 135 and the Smuggling of Migrants Protocol 122.
Article 14 of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol takes specific note of the existence of other international instruments for the purpose of the interpretation of the Protocol. .
To make every effort to sign andratify the Migrants Protocol and the Trafficking in Persons Protocol so that they enter into force as soon as possible.19.
Under the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, it is possible that a valid consent, completely free of any improper means, might be obtained.
Invited Member States to take measures to alleviate the factors that made persons vulnerable to trafficking,consistent with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol;
The forms of exploitation that the Trafficking in Persons Protocol explicitly mentions are not further defined or explained in the Protocol itself.
States reported on general and specific legislative orother measures undertaken to support the implementation of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, in particular article 11, paragraph 5.
The following States signatories to the Trafficking in Persons Protocol were represented by observers: Czech Republic, Japan, Sierra Leone and Sri Lanka.
In its decision 4/4,the Conference invited States to take measures to discourage the demand that fostered all forms of exploitation consistent with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol.
This tool reviews the relevant provisions of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol and the Migrants Protocol, as well as the relevant measures recommended in the OSCE Plan of Action.
The Working Group on Trafficking in Persons should continue its work in advising andassisting the Conference in the implementation of its mandate with regard to the Trafficking in Persons Protocol.
Some speakers noted successes in responding to that problem by effective implementation of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, including its comprehensive definition of the crime.
The Conference further decided to establish an open-ended interim working group, to advise andassist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate with regard to the Trafficking in Persons Protocol.
Neither the Organized Crime Convention nor the Trafficking in Persons Protocol include an explicit obligation for States parties to refrain from criminalizing victims of trafficking.
Although the Trafficking in Persons Protocol does not require the criminalization of deprivation of identification as an element of trafficking, some States parties have done so.
A number of States indicated that, while they had not yet ratified the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, under their domestic legal systems elements of the crime concerned were considered to be offences.
States parties to the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, of which there are currently 157, are required to criminalize trafficking of persons for a range of purposes, including for organ removal.