Examples of using Precursor control legislation in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Precursor control legislation Little Substantial.
Estimate 2004-2005: 47 countries adopting precursor control legislation.
Precursor control legislation and standard operating procedures in place.
New Zealand further strengthened its precursor control legislation.
Namibia reported that new precursor control legislation was expected to enter into force in the coming months.
Target 2006-2007: 50 countries adopting precursor control legislation.
New Zealand strengthened its precursor control legislation by passing the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill in June 2005.
In Romania, a new law was passed that amended andsupplemented the current precursor control legislation.
Most of them have adopted comprehensive precursor control legislation, in compliance with the requirements of the 1988 Convention.
Expert advice and assistance has been provided to 14 Caribbean States in the drafting of new or revised precursor control legislation.
A total of 74 States reported the existence of precursor control legislation in the third reporting period of 2002-2004, compared to 79 in the fourth reporting period of 2004-2006.
Since the report of the Board for 2003 on the implementation of article 122 was issued, a number of countries have tightened their precursor control legislation.
The Board notes that Canada, after the adoption of comprehensive precursor control legislation, has resumed its reporting to the Board.
In Central, South and South-West Asia, 71 per cent of countries reporting in the period 1998-2000 stated that they had precursor control legislation.
The Board notes, however,that the Government of Israel has yet to enact precursor control legislation, as recommended by the Board following its 2004 mission to that country.
Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain andNorthern Ireland reported that they had adopted new precursor control legislation in 2001.
Sub-Saharan Africa had a stable rate of precursor control legislation among responding countries, at 70 per cent, for each of the five reporting periods.
In Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, 44 per cent of countries responding in the period 1998-2000 reported having precursor control legislation in place.
Precursor control legislation in compliance with the requirements of the 1988 Convention has already been adopted in 80 of the 138 countries, including many of the major manufacturing, exporting and importing countries.
In the period 2004-2006, 91 per cent of responding Member States(compared with 82 per cent in the period 2002-2004) reported having precursor control legislation.
In many countries in Africa, there is a lack of adequate precursor control legislation and monitoring, and mechanisms for the control of precursor chemicals are insufficient.
A total of 50 States responded in all four reporting periods, between 1998 and 2006, to the question on whether they possessed precursor control legislation see table 2.
In the fourth reporting cycle(2004-2006), 79 States reported having precursor control legislation(74 in 2002-2004). Of these, 52 had enacted new or revised the existing laws.
Welcoming the multifaceted nature of the recommendations contained in the report of the Expert Meeting on Amphetamine-type Stimulants, which cover prevention, education,information, precursor control, legislation and regulation of amphetamine-type stimulants and their precursors. .
However, those States which had not yet implemented precursor control legislation should be revising or enacting domestic laws and regulations in the field of precursor control in accordance with their obligations under the 1988 Convention.
The fact that three quarters of States reported the revision of their laws pertaining to precursor control by the end of the four reporting periods reflects the willingness of Governments to update their precursor control legislation in line with their international commitments and changing trafficking patterns.
Member States noted that progress had been made in the development of precursor control legislation, the introduction of pre-export notification, and the establishment of working procedures for monitoring and identifying suspicious transactions involving precursors.
Trinidad and Tobago had received assistance to review existing and draft new precursor control legislation under the CICAD/UNDCP Caribbean precursor chemical project.
Jordan reported on the steps taken to update and strengthen its precursor control legislation, while noting at the same time that its control authorities would benefit from technical assistance in comprehensive implementation of such tighter controls. .
Notwithstanding the above, the majority of reporting States(80 per cent) had enhanced their legal framework,having in place precursor control legislation, and 60 per cent had enacted new or revised laws, compared with 55 per cent in the second reporting period.