Examples of using Present guide to practice in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some guidelines in the present Guide to Practice are accompanied by model clauses.
A restriction or condition contained in such statement does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
Some draft guidelines in the present Guide to Practice are accompanied by model clauses.
Unilateral statements formulated in relation to a treaty which are not reservations norinterpretative declarations are outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
Since they are neither reservations norinterpretative declarations within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice, such unilateral statements fall outside its scope/ See draft guideline 1.4 and the commentary thereto.
A State or an international organization may formulate an objection to a reservation for any reason whatsoever, in accordance with the provisions of the present Guide to Practice.
A State or international organization which,having examined the permissibility of a reservation in accordance with the present Guide to Practice, considers that the reservation is impermissible, should nonetheless formulate a reasoned objection to that effect as soon as possible.
A restriction or condition contained in a unilateral statement adopted under an optional clause does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement by which a State indicates that its participation in a treaty does not imply recognition of an entity which it does not recognize is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice even if it purports to exclude the application of the treaty between the declaring State and the non-recognized entity.
A provision in a treaty that purports to limit or restrict the scope orapplication of more general rules contained in the treaty does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
Similarly, statements and notifications of extension of territorial application do not constitute reservations orinterpretative declarations within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice; their authors do not purport to limit application of the treaty or to interpret its terms, but rather to extend its application to a territory to which the treaty did not previously apply.
Lastly, and most importantly, the position traditionally taken by ILO reflects a restrictive view of the concept of reservations which is not reflected in the Vienna Conventions nor in the present Guide to Practice.
Since they are neither reservations nor"simple" or"conditional" interpretative declarations within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice, such unilateral statements fall outside its scope.
A unilateral statement made by a State or by an international organization, in accordance with a clause in a treaty expressly authorizing the parties to accept an obligation that is not otherwise imposed by the treaty,is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement by which a State indicates that its participation in a treaty does not imply recognition of an entity which it does not recognize constitutes a statement of non-recognition which is outside the scope of the present Guide to practice even if it purports to exclude the application of the treaty between the declaring State and the non-recognized entity.
A unilateral statement made by a State oran international organization in accordance with a clause in a treaty expressly authorizing the parties to accept an obligation that is not imposed on them solely by the entry into force of the treaty is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
Unilateral statements formulated in relation to a treaty which are neither reservations nor interpretative declarations(including conditional interpretative declarations)are outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement made by a State or an international organization in accordance with a clause in a treaty that expressly requires the parties to choose between two ormore provisions of the treaty is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
Draft guideline 1.1.5[1.1.6] relates only to statements in the first of these categories; those in the second are the subjectof draft guideline 1.4.2[1.1.6] and are not reservations within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement whereby a State oran international organization purports to add further elements to a treaty constitutes a proposal to modify the content of the treaty which is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A State or international organization that formulates an objection to a reservation may oppose the entry into force of the treaty as between itself and the reserving State or international organization for any reason whatsoever,in accordance with the provisions of the present Guide to Practice.
Nonetheless, it should be noted that even in the case of a reservation that is"disguised"(as an interpretative declaration)-- which,from a legal standpoint, has always been a reservation-- the rules of procedure and formulation as set out in the present Guide to Practice remain fully applicable.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization in relation to a treaty whereby its author purports to undertake obligations going beyond those imposed on it by the treaty constitutes a unilateral commitment which is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
Informative declarations", whereby a State informs its partners, for example, of the internal authorities that will be responsible for implementing the treaty, regardless of how it will discharge its obligations or how it will exercise its rights under the treaty,are outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
Thus, Malaysia wishes to emphasize that as long as such statement does not modify the content of the treaty in such a way as to modify or exclude the effects of the treaty or the provisions of the treaty altogether-- in which case the statement may be regarded as a reservation-- such statement could be effectively excluded from the present Guide to Practice.
An agreement[, concluded under a specific provision of a treaty,] by which two or more States purport to exclude or to modify the legal effect ofcertain provisions[of the][of a] treaty or of the treaty as a whole in their application to their relations inter se does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization expresses its views on a treaty or on the subject matter covered by the treaty, without purporting to produce a legal effect on the treaty,constitutes a general statement of policy which is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral declaration by which a State or an international organization purports to notify its intention to suspend the application of[all or] certain provisions of a treaty[whether in application of an escape clause or a waiver or under general rules on the suspension of treaties]is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization whereby that State or that organization indicates the manner in which it intends to implement a treaty at the internal level, without affecting its rights and obligations towards the other contracting States or contracting organizations,is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
It is to these definitions alone that the legal regime of reservations and interpretative declarations, as specified in these other parts, applies, which does not mean either that it will necessarily bea uniform regime for each of these categories or that certain elements of these regimes are not applicable to other unilateral statements which do not fall within the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
