Examples of using Recognition may in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Such legal recognition may take the following forms.
She noted that concerns had been expressed that the law's threetier system of State recognition may contravene the principles of equality and nondiscrimination.
This recognition may justify specifically targeted responses.
Harmonizing conditions andlimitations of mutual recognition may however be an extremely complex objective.
A decision on recognition may also be subject to appeal or review, under applicable domestic law.
We cannot claim to have exhausted the list of situations in which the issue of recognition may arise, as appears from some other examples of recent practice.
While the act of recognition may be regarded as declarative, it has important legal effects.
When PPM-related criteria refer to environmental effects which are not addressed by regulations,concepts such as equivalencies and mutual recognition may be effective in dealing with the PPM issue.
The relief flowing from recognition may depend upon the category into which a foreign proceeding falls.
Such caution is demonstrated, for example, by certain authors who, while starting from the assumption that recognition is revocable,assert that"recognition may be revoked and there exists no right to its maintenance.
Such recognition may be withdrawn if the Central Commission observes that the conditions established are no longer satisfied.
The Supreme Court of Canada stated that a de facto unilateral secession of a province would violate the Canadian Constitution, butit could still be recognized by the international community and that such recognition may result from the conduct of the provincial and the federal government.
The relief flowing from recognition may depend upon the category into which a foreign proceeding falls.
Signatures complying with the laws of another State relating to electronic signatures are recognized as legally equivalent to signatures under…[the law of the enacting State]if the laws of the other State require a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required for such signatures under…[the law of the enacting State]. Such recognition may be made by a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement with other States.
Recognition may be based upon an agreement among the interested parties, or granted autonomously, through harmonization or otherwise.
It is important that the Government firmly establish the principle that all political parties have the right to legal recognition, may recruit new members, open new offices and seek to attract support; they must be able to operate without fear of closure, threats or attacks.
Such a recognition may be stated either on the basis of international agreements or(if there are no such agreements) by means of notification.
Signatures and records complying with the laws of another State relating to digital or other electronic signatures are recognized as legally equivalent to signatures and records complying with these Rules if the laws of the other State require a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required for such records andsignatures under…[the Law of the enacting State]. Such recognition may be made by a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement with other States.
Such recognition may be due to increases in both the absolute number of disabled persons and the percentage of the population with a disability in many countries.
Certificates issued by a foreign certification authority are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by certification authorities operating under…[the lawof the enacting State] if the practices of the foreign certification authority provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of certification authorities under these Rules. Such recognition may be made through a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement between or among the States concerned.
Paragraph 4 clarifies that the decision on recognition may be revisited if grounds for granting it were fully or partially lacking or have ceased to exist.
Certificates issued by a foreign information certifier are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by information certifiers operating under…[the law of the enacting State]if the practices of the foreign information certifiers provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of information certifiers under…[the law of the enacting State]. Such recognition may be made through a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement between or among the States concerned.
Special recognition may be given to the recognized team leader, but care should be taken not to single out staff to the detriment of the team spirit.
In addition, recognition may be either explicit or implicit, and it may be either de jure or de facto, making the task of analysis still more difficult.
In any case, this recognition may be considered as a beginning point for further considerations as to what extent this obligation may be extended to other kinds of offences.
Thus, for example, recognition may be conventional in nature, as is the case, among many others, of the recognition of the United States of America under the Treaty of Paris of 3 September 1783, which was concluded between Great Britain and the United States.
Recognition may be based on an international agreement, involving a reply or an acceptance, but international law also grants it legal effects on its own account inasmuch as a State which has recognized a given claim or a given state of affairs cannot thereafter contest its legitimacy.
Although article 13 represented an improvement to the existing system,in some jurisdictions the recognition might entail some delay and might not be available at the time needed by the foreign representative.
Recognition might be withheld, for example, if the foreign bankruptcy order is considered to be merely a declaration of status or if it is considered not to be final.
Article 6, which did not relate specifically to recognition, might have no place in a bilateral convention.