Examples of using Said that draft article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 8 was not contentious.
It was said that draft article 21 did not fully capture the functions of presentation, and therefore did not provide an adequate functional equivalence rule on presentation.
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 23 was a standard provision.
Mr. Seweha(Egypt) said that draft article 25 established the general principle that written statements should be submitted within 45 days, but then added the exception that the tribunal might extend that time limit if it concluded that the extension was justified.
Mr. Madrid Parra(Spain),supported by Mr. Chung Wan-yong(Republic of Korea), said that draft article 19 bis appeared to be redundant, since its content was already covered by draft articles 19 and 22.
The CHAIRMAN said that draft article 2, entitled"Use of terms", reiterated the text proposed by the International Law Commission, except that the order of paragraphs(a) and(b) had been reversed, and an amended version of paragraph(c) and a new paragraph(d) had been proposed by the United States of America and the European Union.
Mr. Blake-Lawson(United Kingdom) said that draft article 60 in its entirety should be deleted.
Mr. Agrawal(India) said that draft article 3 of the proposed convention was inconsistent with article 1, paragraph 2, of the Rules on Transparency.
Mr. Jaeger(Observer for the Comité Français de l'Arbitrage), referring members to the Comité's written comments(A/CN.9/704/Add.5), said that draft article 9 did not provide for arbitrators to consult with the parties before appointing the president of the arbitral tribunal.
Mr. Seweha(Egypt) said that draft article 2 should be comprehensive and inclusive of all practical cases.
Mr. Ibrahima Khalil Diallo(Senegal) said that draft article 14 had been debated at great length in the Working Group.
It was further said that draft article 16 might give rise to differing interpretations, in particular the proviso"save for intentional wrongdoing" might be interpreted differently in various jurisdictions.
Mr. Ibrahima Khalil Diallo(Senegal) said that draft article 82 was of great interest to the States of his region.
The Chairperson said that draft article 11 referred to"impartiality and independence", as did the first sentence of each of the draft model statements.
Mr. Bellenger(France) said that draft article 19 was already excessively complex.
Mr. Hu Zhengliang(China) said that draft article 18 was part of a compromise package on the carrier's liability, and it would therefore not be appropriate to consider it in isolation.
Mr. Sandoval(Chile) said that draft article 14 should be retained as it stood.
In response, it was said that draft article 40 already provided that the arbitral tribunal could determine the costs in any decision, and the proposed modification might not be necessary.
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 2 had given rise to extensive debate in the Working Group.
Ms. Nicholas(Secretariat) said that draft article 7 set out the conditions to be met if a procuring entity wished to resort to single-source procurement.
Mr. Sekolec(Secretary of the Commission) said that draft article 6 did not concern the number of parties, but the number of conciliators.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that draft article 16 envisaged a situation in which the carrier did not realize that the goods posed a potential danger; the situation envisaged in draft article 18 was quite different.
Mr. Egbadon(Nigeria) said that draft article 38 could not be considered in isolation from draft article 41.
Mr. Martens(Germany) said that draft article 1 ought to be read in conjunction with draft articles 18 and 19.
Mr. Mayer(Switzerland) said that draft article 67 should be retained purely in the interests of shippers and claimants.
Mr. Miller(United States of America) said that draft article 27 was already part of a compromise proposed by more than thirty countries and supported by others.
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 25 was a standard provision in UNCTRAL and other United Nations instruments.
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 18 had initially provided only for declarations excluding matters from the scope of application of the convention.
Mr. García Feraud(Observer for Ecuador) said that draft article 9 dealt with disclosure of information to the parties to the conciliation, not to outsiders.
Mr. Estrella Faria(Secretariat) said that draft article 16 bis had been included at the request of the delegations to the forty-fourth session of the Working Group listed in footnote 7 to document A/CN.9/577.