Examples of using Value engineering in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
IV. Value engineering.
Reassess the merits of the value engineering programme.
Value engineering activities, as well as costs and fees;
This type of refinement is sometimes termed“value engineering”.
As useful as it is, the value engineering programme has two limitations.
Amount to be identified for savings through value engineering.
Detailed description of the value engineering activities, as well as the related costs and fees;
The Board recommends that the Administration reassess the merits of the value engineering programme.
As a result of the risk assessment, a value engineering review of the General Assembly Building was undertaken.
Breakdown of the estimated cost savings to be realized through each value engineering initiative;
Value engineering meant reviewing the objectives and the actual design of the project and finding ways of attaining the objectives at lower cost.
The Board conducted a review of the value engineering programme.
Welcomes the success of value engineering activities in identifying over 100 million United States dollars in potential cost savings;
In paragraph 62, the Board recommended that the Administration reassess the merits of the value engineering programme.
Reassess the merits of the value engineering programme(para. 62);
As a key element of its pre-construction responsibilities, the construction manager will make value engineering recommendations.
The point about value engineering was why, if savings were possible, they had not been brought forward earlier, during the budget discussion in 2006.
Classical FCA has three English synonyms- Value Engineering, Value Management, Value Analysis.
The Administration will take into account anticipated costs andbenefits when conducting any additional extensive value engineering exercise.
The Office of the Capital Master Plan continues to make value engineering efforts whenever feasible or practical.
The Advisory Committee also requested that the Secretary-General specify in the cost estimate of the project the cost of the fees relating to the value engineering programme.
This increase is due in part to the strategy change and the value engineering programme, which generated additional studies.
The requests concerning value engineering contained in General Assembly resolution 63/270 should be addressed in the forthcoming progress report on the capital master plan.
The Board was therefore unable to provide any assurance as to the actual efficiency of the value engineering programme in terms of cost reduction.
The cost savings identified through value engineering were welcome, but value engineering must not be allowed to compromise the quality of the work.
To bring the total project cost back down tothe level of the approved budget($1.9 billion), the Office of the Capital Master Plan continued to identify savings through the value engineering programme.
According to the Office ofthe Capital Master Plan, the fees related to this value engineering programme equalled up to one quarter of the savings expected.
The value engineering programme has since then been a cost control tool used continuously as the project was implemented, and more intensively when negotiating guaranteed maximum price contracts.
To date, estimates indicate that the effort has been successful and the value engineering work will continue through the procurement process for each subproject of the capital master plan.
It is uncertain, however, whether the value engineering programme can generate a further $100 million, as suggested in the aforementioned report of the Secretary-General.