Examples of using Waste data in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Waste data and classifications;
This paper analyses the waste data as reported by the EECCA countries.
Waste data and classifications.
The practice of one country of using surveys to obtain waste data from landfills was presented.
Waste data are not regularly collected, though this is required by the LEP.
People also translate
Actions were taken in the areas of monitoring of inland waters andair pollution, waste data and classifications, and environmental indicators.
Reported waste data cannot be directly compared with waste data from other countries.
The Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources and its territorial offices provide waste data collection, data aggregating and storage.
The UNEP's experience on waste data collection in the subregion will be also presented.
In its work on renewables andwaste, the IEA takes a different perspective on waste terminology and waste data collection.
In most other countries, waste data are reported according to five classes of waste toxicity.
Revision of statistical data reporting in Azerbaijan to cover reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and improve waste data collection;
In several countries, hazardous waste data are unreliable because of inaccurate inventories and different classification systems.
During the afternoon session the ETC/WMF experts will make presentations on what might be improved in the national waste classifications systemsin the EECCA and on the role of local authorities in waste data collection and analysis.
Many EECCA countries have made progress regarding waste data but the data are often available only in national SoE reports and not in the statistical publications.
The Plenary also requested a further corrigendum to be issued in English, so thatinternational readers who are searching for information on dangerous goods and hazardous waste data will be able to identify this relevant document.
Furthermore, problems exist with waste data collected from trade statistics, for example problems with accounting for the purpose of treatment for which waste was shipped, e.g. waste shipped for recycling.
The Ad Hoc Working Group on Environmental Monitoring contributed to the preparation of the Kiev Assessment report and it undertook activities on monitoring hazardous substances, monitoring inland waters,environmental indicators, waste data and classifications, information technologies and remote sensing.
In Hungary, hazardous waste data collected in accordance with a Government decree can be inspected free of charge, but a fee must be paid for additional data or for sorting and processing data. .
The Eurostat representative gave a positive assessment of the quality of the data on base materials collected under the Basel Convention; however,the representative noted that there are problems with waste data collected from trade statistics, for example problems with accounting for waste shipped for recycling.
Serbia had started to use special software(eDAMIS application)for the transmission of waste data to Eurostat and had established an information system on waste for facilities that were not covered by the national PRTR; more than 800 companies sent waste data to that information system.
For the newly Independent States(NIS) and other UNECE countries that are not covered by EEA networks it might be of particular interest to understand the concept of indicator development that EEA is currently adopting,to define whether it fits into the actual needs of the countries and to find out which waste data can be obtained at the national level needed for the production of the relevant indicators.
Workshop programme On the first day, the Workshop will be opened by a series of keynote presentations on EEA and its European Topic Centre on Waste and Material Flows, including a core set of indicators, and on the experience of some EU accession countries inadapting their legislation and practices to up-to-date requirements on waste data collection and reporting.
Belgium(European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register(E-PRTR), stricter thresholds, additional pollutants; refinements regarding reporting time frames, data collection procedures andcompleting pollutant release and transfer register(PRTR) waste data with those waste volumes below PRTR reporting thresholds in order to allow calculation of the full amount of waste produced(Flanders Region));
It kept under review the preparations for the Kiev Assessment Report, established a task force on tools and guidelines, assessed the monitoring and information situation in seven newly independent States and adopted recommendations for these countries, considered activities on monitoring hazardous substances, air pollution and inland waters,environmental indicators, waste data and classifications, and took relevant decisions.
A second workshop will be organized on 2-3 October 2003 in Tbilisi, Georgia to discuss and finalize recommendations to the Governments of the three Caucasian countries and other EECCA countries for improving national waste classification systems,routine waste data collection as well as reporting bythrough the use of indicators on waste and material flows that are compatible with those applied in EEA countries.
The Ad Hoc Working Group on Environmental Monitoring, at its first session, reviewed the table of contents and guidelines for data collection for the Kiev assessment report, and it made practical arrangements for action on monitoring hazardous substances, monitoring inland waters,environmental indicators, waste data and classifications, information technologies and remote sensing.
The Working Group had reviewed the draft table of contents and guidelines for data collection for the Kiev assessment report, considered ongoing monitoring activities at international level, and discussed proposals on monitoring hazardous substances, monitoring inland waters,environmental indicators, waste data and classifications, information technologies and remote sensing, including practical arrangements for action in some of these areas.
It kept under review and contributed to the preparations of the Kiev Assessment Report, launched an activity on tools and guidelines, assessed the situation with environmental monitoring situation and information systems in nine countries in transition and adopted recommendations for these countries, considered activities on monitoring hazardous substances, air pollution and inland waters,environmental indicators, waste data and classifications, state- of- the- environment reporting, on remote sensing, and made arrangements for follow-up.