Examples of using Which recommendations in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Which recommendations are the most useful to them.
Specifying additional information needed and which recommendations had not been adequately implemented.
Ii identifying which recommendations are suitable for the development of(a) global technical regulation(s)(gtr(s)) by the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations(WP.29); and.
Among others, it is worth mentioning the two Commission Communications of 6 June 1990 and1 June 1994 in which recommendations were put forward for the possible format and content of the new GSP scheme of the European Union.
Following an inquiry from the Government of the Philippines and as a result of information provided by the secretariat,the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in its report for part one of the fourth instalment of category"D" claims, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 81.
People also translate
Several Committee members had referred to two of the criteria used when deciding which recommendations should be subject to follow-up, namely that they must involve serious issues and must be achievable within one year.
It must take into account the cost of implementing its recommendations, perhaps by focusing on sources of financing, andindicate the mechanisms by which recommendations could be translated into action.
With regard to the format of his Office's annual report, in which recommendations were not highlighted in bold type, as required by the General Assembly, he explained that OIOS was merely reporting on recommendations it had already made and was not now submitting to the Assembly recommendations on which the Assembly was required to act.
Following an inquiry from the Permanent Mission of Israel,the"D2" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the the part two of the eighth instalment of"D" claims report"D8(2)" report, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 141.
In its review of the overlappingclaims included in the"Third special report and recommendations made by the merged'E4'Panel of Commissioners concerning overlapping claims"(S/AC.26/2004/13), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 231(S/AC.26/Dec.231(2004)), the secretariat identified two claims(one category"C" claim and one subcategory"E4" claim) filed by two Governments for the same loss.
Following an inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of information provided by the secretariat,the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in its report for the eleventh instalment of category"D" claims, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 147.
As a result of information provided by the secretariat,the"D2" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim submitted through the Government of Kuwait that was included in the the part two of the eighth instalment of"D" claims report"D8(2)" report, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 141.
Following an inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of informationprovided by the secretariat, the"D2" panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the tenth instalment"D" report, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 146 S/AC.26/Dec.146 2002.
Following an inquiry from the Government of Kuwait, the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report and recommendations of the Panel of Commissioners concerning the tenth instalment of'E1'claims"(S/AC.26/2003/28), which recommendations wereas approved by the Governing Council in decision 209 S/AC.26/Dec.209 2003.
Following another inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of information provided by the secretariat,the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in its report for the eleventh instalment of category"D" claims, which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 147 S/AC.26/Dec.147 2002.
Two corrections relate to category"C" claims that were included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the first instalment of Palestinian late claims for damages up to USD 100,000(category'C'claims)"(S/AC.26/2003/26), which recommendations were approved in decision 207 S/AC.26/Dec.207 2003.
The claim was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D1'panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the eighth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2001/25), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 141 S/AC.26/Dec.141 2001.
Three further corrections relate to category"C" claims that were included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the second instalment of Palestinian'late claims' for damages up to USD 100,000(category'C'claims)"(S/AC.26/2004/3), which recommendations were approved in decision 207 S/AC.26/Dec.216 2004.
Following an inquiry by the Permanent Mission of Poland, the"E3A" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report and recommendations of the Panel of Commissioners concerning the twenty-second instalment of'E3'claims"(S/AC.26/2002/32), which recommendations wereas approved by the Governing Council in decision 177 S/AC.26/Dec.177 2002.
Following an inquiry from the Government of the United States, the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D1'Panel of Commissioners concerning part one of the fourth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)", which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 81.
Following an inquiry from the Government of Kuwait, the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D2'Panel of Commissioners concerning the tenth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2002/1), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 146 S/AC.26/Dec.146 2002.
Following an inquiry from the Palestinian Authority, the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the panel of Commissioners concerning the second instalment of Palestinian late claims for damages up to USD 100,000(category'C'claims)"(S/AC.26/2004/3), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 216 S/AC.26/Dec.216 2004.
Following another inquiry from the Government of Kuwait, the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D2'panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the twelfth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2003/31), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 181 S/AC.26/Dec.181 2003.
Following a further inquiry from the Government of Kuwait, the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D1'Panel of Commissioners concerning the thirteenth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2002/20), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 165 S/AC.26/Dec.165 2002.
Following observations and recommendations made by the Officeof Internal Oversight Services to the Commission(the"OIOS"), the secretariat reviewed four claims filed through the Government of Kuwait that were included in the"Report and recommendations of the Panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the third instalment of'F3'claims"(S/AC.26/2002/19), which recommendations wereas approved by the Governing Council in decision 164 S/AC.26/Dec.164 2002.
Following an inquiry from the Government of France, the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D2'Panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the eighth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2001/25)("part two of the eighth instalment report"), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 141 S/AC.26/Dec.141 2001.
Following another inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of information provided by the secretariat, the"D1" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D1'Panel of Commissioners concerning the eleventh instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2002/2), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 147 S/AC.26/Dec.147 2002.
Following another inquiry from the Palestinian Authority,the secretariat reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report and recommendations made by the panel of Commissioners concerning the fourth instalment of Palestinian'late claims' for damages up to USD 100,000(category'C'claims)"(S/AC.26/2005/3)(the"Fourth category'C'Palestinian late claims report"), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 239 S/AC.26/Dec.239 2005.
Following an additional inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of information provided by the secretariat, the"D2" Panel of Commissioners reviewed a claim that was included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D2'Panel of Commissioners concerning part one of the fourteenth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2002/21), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 166 S/AC.26/Dec.166 2002.
Following an inquiry from the Government of Kuwait and as a result of information provided by the secretariat, the"D1" panel of Commissioners reviewed two of the above claims that were included in the"Report andrecommendations made by the'D1'panel of Commissioners concerning the seventh instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000(category 'D'claims)"(S/AC.26/2000/25), which recommendations were approved by the Governing Council in decision 111 S/AC.26/Dec.111 2000.