Examples of using Whose consent in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Understand whose consent is necessary for a viable mediation process to start.
It was further stated that, as a general rule,the number of States whose consent was required should be kept to the minimum.
Consideration should be given to including as an"interested State"- whose consent is required before the court could exercise jurisdiction in any particular case- the State of nationality of the victim, the State which may be the target of the crime and in some cases the State of the nationality of the suspect.
However, he congratulated the bishops to whom he wrote for submitting the question to the Bishop of Rome, whose consent was required for a definitive decision.
In the event,the person whose consent is required refuses to provide consent. .
He was not in favour of restricting the number of eligible complainant States orof extending the number of States whose consent was required for the exercise of the court's jurisdiction.
In that connection, the number of States whose consent was needed for the court to exercise its jurisdiction should be kept to a minimum.
Every marriage certificate must be duly signed by the registrar, by the spouses, and by the fathers orheads of family whose consent is required at the time of celebration.
The representative of an authority with whose consent a crime indicated in the first section was committed, shall be liable as an accomplice for committing the crime.
In addition to the perpetrator of crimes against humanity set outin the Criminal Code, the representative of the authority with whose consent the crime was committed is also held liable.
I address my special words of gratitude to the Government of Portugal, whose consent voluntarily to relocate to group B opened the way for the adoption of the aforementioned decision.
The first alternative would be to divide the issue into two parts: the first part would cover the question as to who could trigger the Court's jurisdiction, andthe second the question of whose consent was needed for the Court to exercise jurisdiction.
A marriage may be challenged by one of the two weds… whose consent was extorted with force… or excluded as a result of an error.
In regard to categories of persons who are treated differently in the context of victim consent, some States go farther than the Trafficking in Persons Protocol in delineating categories whose consent is irrelevant without regard to the"means" used.
They were in favour of keeping to the minimum the number of States whose consent would be needed for the international criminal court to exercise jurisdiction.
A State whose consent is the basis for the conduct of another State(e.g., overflight, or its occupation of territory) is of course entitled to make its consent conditional on the payment of a fee, or rental, or compensation for harm incurred: this is a matter for negotiation at the time consent is given.
The second category should be strictly regulated by the General Assembly, whose consent should be required for the acceptance of that type of personnel.
Such action for annulment may only be instituted by the spouse whose consent was required within the peremptory period of three years from the date when such spouse became aware of the act, or from the date of registration if such act is registerable, or from the date of the termination of the Community of Acquests, whichever is the earliest.
Deprived of legal capacity, people are assigned a guardian orother substitute decision maker, whose consent will be deemed sufficient to justify forced treatment E/CN.4/2005/51, para. 79.
Meaning that, subject to the consent of the detained person(except for minors, whose consent is not required), the detention must be immediately communicated to a relative, or to any trustworthy person named by the detained person, or to a lawyer of his/her choice.
As regards paragraph 3 of article 1,some delegations suggested that the term"host State" should be defined as follows:"'host State' means a State with whose consent the United Nations operation is conducted in its territory.
Each Party shall provide in its internal law for the possibility for all parties to a contract whose consent has been undermined by an act of corruption to be able to apply to the court for the contract to be declared void, notwithstanding their right to claim for damages.
Other delegations felt that, to avoid subjecting the operation of the court to undue restrictions, the consent requirement should be limited to the territorial State, which had a particular interest in theprosecution of the case, or to the custodial State, whose consent was necessary for the court to obtain custody of the accused.
Subsection 2 of the same paragraph provides that a representative of the authorities on whose consent an offence referred to in subsection 1 was perpetrated, shall be held liable for the crime as an accomplice.
Management of such common services requires a responsiveness to the concerns of these client organizations whose consent and cooperation are an essential element of the common services framework.
On the other hand, the parties referred to in resolution 186(1964)are the Government of Cyprus, whose consent is required for the presence and renewal of the mandate of UNFICYP, and the three guarantor powers, namely, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom, which are to be consulted about the size and the composition of the force.
The acceptance of a treaty subject to a reservation is ineffective unless or until every State orinternational organization whose consent is requisite to the effectiveness of that reservation had consented thereto". Ibid., p. 240.
Secondly, while the smuggled migrant generally initiallyconsents to being smuggled, the trafficked person is a victim of crime whose consent may never have been given or may have been vitiated by the use of means threat or use of force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or giving or receiving of payments or benefits.
His delegation continued to have difficulty with the approach taken in the draft to selecting those categories of States whose consent would be required before a case could be investigated and prosecuted before the court.
It was therefore asked whether, under paragraph 1 of draft article 16,the first holder whose consent was required would be the shipper, or rather the person to which the electronic transferable record was in fact issued.