Examples of using Whose initial reports in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee sent reminder letters to all States parties whose initial reports were overdue as of 2005.
The two members sent reminders to States whose initial reports were overdue by five years or more and met informally with representatives of a number of them.
The Committee had decided to take up at its next session the question of some 30 States parties whose initial reports were seriously overdue.
Four States parties whose initial reports are not yet due have indicated that they possess stockpiles of cluster munitions which will have to be destroyed.
Mr. KRETZMER recalled that in October 1997 the Committee had decided to tell countries whose initial reports were long overdue that a deadline had been set for consideration of those reports. .
It also decided that representatives ofthe specialized agencies and bodies of the United Nations should be invited to address the Committee as a whole in a closed meeting on those States parties whose initial reports were before the Committee.7.
Mr. EL IBRASHI suggested that the reminders sent to States parties whose initial reports were overdue should draw their attention to the fact that they were in violation of the Convention.
The Committee also agreed that the specialized agencies andother entities should also be invited to address the Committee as a whole in a closed meeting on States parties whose initial reports are to be taken up by the Committee.
At its fortyninth session,the Committee further decided that States parties whose initial reports were overdue by five years or more would also be scheduled for a review of implementation of the provisions of the Convention.
As a salient development of the Committee's working methods in dealing with States party reports, the Committee accepted the participation of independent national monitoring mechanisms during the dialogue with the delegations of two States parties whose initial reports were considered during the session.
At its 776th meeting, held on 31 January 2002, the Committee decided to send a letter to all States parties whose initial reports were due in 1992 and 1993, requesting them to submit that report within one year.
Two States parties, namely Cape Verde andSaint Lucia, whose initial reports under article 18 of the Convention were more than 10 years overdue, were notified of the Committee's intention to take up implementation of the Convention at the thirty-fifth session.
The Committee again requested the Secretary-General to continue sending reminders automatically to those States parties whose initial reports were more than 12 months overdue and subsequent reminders every six months.
The Committee reviewed information on States whose initial reports were more than 10 years overdue and decided to notify two States parties-- Cape Verde and Saint Lucia-- of its intention to take up implementation of the Convention at its thirty-fifth session July 2006.
The Chairperson said that the Committee could consider Mr. Bruni's idea of sending an explicit warning to certain States parties whose initial reports were seriously overdue when it discussed its working methods on the final day of the session.
Those States parties whose initial reports are already in preparation at the time of transmittal of these guidelines can complete and submit their report to the Committee even if the report has not been prepared in conformity with the present guidelines.
In accordance with rule 65 of the Committee's rules of procedure andits decisions, the Secretary-General continued sending reminders automatically to those States parties whose initial reports were more than 12 months overdue, and subsequent reminders every six months.
Further to its decision to send reminders to all States parties whose initial reports are overdue, the Committee decided, at its forty-ninth session, to take action with regard to States parties whose initial reports were long overdue.
The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women decided that representatives ofthe specialized agencies and bodies of the United Nations should be invited to address the Committee as a whole in a closed meeting on those States parties whose initial reports were before the Committee.
The Committee notified two States parties, namely, Cape Verde andSaint Lucia, whose initial reports under article 18 of the Convention are more than 10 years overdue, of its intention to take up implementation of the Convention at the thirty-fifth session July 2006.
The Committee decided to further assess the situation with regard to non-submission of initial reports at its thirty-first session, and to postpone, for the time being,the follow-up meeting planned for the thirty-first session with those States whose initial reports would be more than five years overdue as of May 2004.
The Committee decided that those States parties whose initial reports were already in preparation at the time of transmittal of the guidelines, be encouraged to complete and submit their reports to the Committee even though they had not been prepared in conformity with the guidelines.
The CHAIRPERSON drew the Committee's attention to a note by the secretariat concerning ways of encouraging States parties to meet their reporting obligations(CMW/C/6/CRP.2),as well as to a list of countries whose initial reports were due or had not been received as of 24 April 2007 document without a symbol, distributed in the meeting room.
In particular, the Committee decided that those States parties whose initial reports under article 18 of the Convention were more than five years overdue as of 18 July 2003 would receive a letter from the Chairperson of the Committee reminding them of their reporting obligations see paras. 451-454 below.
Considering the positive result of the cooperation with Guinea, which resulted in the submission of a report, a dialogue with a delegation for the examination of measures taken by the State party and the adoption, at its fifty-second session, of concluding observations on the State party,the Committee decided, also at its fifty-second session, to take action with regard to States parties whose initial reports were long overdue.
The Committee recalled its decision, taken at its thirty-first session, to notify two States parties, namely, Cape Verde andSaint Lucia, whose initial reports under article 18 of the Convention are more than 10 years overdue, of its intention to take up implementation of the Convention at the thirty-fifth session July 2006.
With regard to States parties whose initial reports were more than four or five years overdue, namely Brazil, Guinea, Guyana, Togo and Uganda, the Committee deplored the fact that, in spite of several reminders sent by the Secretary-General and letters or other messages from its Chairman to their respective Ministers for Foreign Affairs, those States parties continued not to comply with the obligations they had freely assumed under the Convention.
The Committee had decided to send reminders with specific timelines for report submission to States parties whose initial reports were five years overdue or whose periodic reports were ten years overdue and to encourage them to take advantage of technical assistance available through the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the United Nations Development Fund for Women(UNIFEM) and the Division for the Advancement of Women.