Examples of using Mandatory values in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
In coastal areas compliance with the mandatory values slipped from 100% in 2003 to 97.4%.
Areas out of 231 that failed to comply in the previous year complied with at least the mandatory values in 2006.
In freshwater areas the compliance rate with mandatory values fell by(6.8% points to 73.6%), the second consecutive decrease.
Of coastal bathing waters were classified as'sufficient',and complied with the less stringent mandatory values- a 1% increase.
Compliance with mandatory values was 98.7% at coastal sites and 95.1% in inland areas97.5% and 95.4% in 2003.
The trend is unfortunately not improving as, since 2003, compliance with mandatory values has decreased by 7%.
Rates of compliance with the mandatory values were very high at 97.5% for coastal and 97.3% for freshwater areas98.4% and 96.4% in 2003.
Compliance in coastal areas was relatively good, both with mandatory values(89.5%) and guide values(78.9%).
Water quality at Europe's most popular summer destinations was generally good-with more than 90% of bathing water sites meeting the mandatory values.
The percentage of freshwater bathing areas complying with the mandatory values remained high at 94.7% 95.9% in 2003.
Some 93.1% of coastal bathing waters have been classified as‘sufficient',or complying with the less stringent mandatory values.
In 2006 bathingwas banned in 34 sites that met the mandatory values the previous year and in five previously non-compliant sites.
Some 93.1% of coastal bathing waters were classified as‘sufficient',or complying with the less stringent mandatory values- a 1% increase.
The compliance rate of Luxembourg's 20 freshwater sites with the mandatory values fell sharply in 2004 to 65% from an already low 80% the previous year.
Compliance with mandatory values remains very high in both coastal and inland areas, at 97.7% and 100% respectively(98.4% and 100% in 2003).
There are quite good results and data for coastal waters:96% are complying with the mandatory values and 89% with the more stringent guide values. .
To determine their quality bathing waters are tested against a number of physical,chemical and microbiological parameters for which the Bathing Water Directive sets out mandatory values.
Of the previously banned areas complied with at least the mandatory values in 2006 and two were non-compliant, while bathing remained prohibited in 248 areas.
Freshwater bathing areas out of 209 which had failed to comply in theprevious year complied with at least the mandatory values during the 2005 season.
Overall compliance with mandatory values remained generally very high for both coastal and freshwater(95.7 and 94.9%) and stable compared to 2003.
The opposite evolution was registered for 171bathing areas that complied with at least the mandatory values in 2005 and became non-compliant in 2006.
Compliance with mandatory values was very high for both coastal and freshwater zones(98.1 and 98.6%), and showed a further improvement from the previous year(93.2% and 97.6% respectively).
The positive balance is mainly due to the strong reduction in the number of bathing areas that were not su-ciently sampled in 2005 andcomplied with at least the mandatory values in 2006.
Compared to the 2005 bathing season the compliance with the mandatory values remained high for the coastal waters(96.1%) and increased to 88.6% for the freshwater bathing areas.
Compliance with the mandatory values was particularly high at both freshwater and coastal bathing sites, at around 98.2% and 98.3% respectively, and remained stable compared to the previous year(96.3% and 98.5% respectively).
The directive establishes parameters applicable to designated shellfish waters,indicative values, mandatory values, reference methods of analysis and the minimum frequency for taking samples and measures.
Two years after joining the EU compliance with mandatory values in the new Member States is 94.9% for coastal waters and 81.2% for fresh water bathing areas compared to 96.2% and 90.0% for the old Member States.
In general, coastal bathing water quality deteriorated between 2009 and2010� the number of bathing water bodies meeting the mandatory values fell by 3.5%, while those meeting guide values fell by 9.5%.
Freshwater bathing areas that had been complying with the mandatory values during the 2005 season complied with the more stringent guide values during the 2006 season.
In general, coastal bathing water quality deteriorated between 2009 and 2010-the number of bathing water bodies meeting the mandatory values fell by 3.5%, while those meeting guide values fell by 9.5%. Inland water quality has also dropped.