Examples of using Mandatory values in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
In coastal areas compliance with the mandatory values slipped from 100% in 2003 to 97.4.
Of coastal bathing areas and 89% of bathing sites in rivers andlakes are in compliance with the mandatory values.
The percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory values was 1.3% compared to 1.5% in the previous year.
As regards freshwater bathing sites,the data are less good, but a reassuring 86% are in compliance in relation to mandatory values.
The percentage of freshwater bathing areas complying with the mandatory values remained high at 94.7% 95.9% in 2003.
Compliance with mandatory values was 98.7% at coastal sites and 95.1% in inland areas 97.5% and 95.4% in 2003, respectively.
The trend is unfortunately not improving as, since 2003, compliance with mandatory values has decreased by 7.
Member States must comply with the mandatory values but may adopt the stricter standards and non-binding guide values. .
Some 93.1% of coastal bathing waters were classified as‘sufficient', orcomplying with the less stringent mandatory values- a 1% increase.
In freshwater areas the compliance rate with mandatory values fell by(6.8% points to 73.6%), the second consecutive decrease.
The positive balance is mainly due to the strong reduction in the number of bathing areas that were not su-ciently sampled in 2005 andcomplied with at least the mandatory values in 2006.
The improvement applies to compliance with both the mandatory values(98.9%) and the guide values 83.1% Compliance rates in 2003 were 97.4% and 79.7% respectively.
Of the 248 new coastal bathing areas monitored during the 2005 bathing season complied with the mandatory values or the more stringent guide values. .
Overall compliance with mandatory values remained generally very high for both coastal and freshwater(95.7 and 94.9%) and stable compared to 2003.
The results reported show low compliance rates at 22.4% with mandatory values and 14.9% with guide values. .
Rates of compliance with the mandatory values were very high at 97.5% for coastal and 97.3% for freshwater areas 98.4% and 96.4% in 2003, respectively.
Compliance in coastal areas was relatively good, both with mandatory values(89.5%) and guide values 78.9.
Average compliance with mandatory values in the‘old' EU-15 is 96.8% for coastal areas(13.765 sites) and 91.9% for freshwater areas 5.730 sites.
Bathing water quality in coastal areas was very high, both with the mandatory values(98.9%) and the guide values 89.5.
Compliance with mandatory values was very high for both coastal and freshwater zones(98.1 and 98.6%), and showed a further improvement from the previous year 93.2% and 97.6% respectively.
The opposite evolution was registered for 171 bathing areas that complied with at least the mandatory values in 2005 and became non-compliant in 2006.
Member States must comply with the mandatory values but may adopt stricter standards or decide to follow the non-binding guide values also contained in the directive.
There are quite good results and data for coastal waters:96% are complying with the mandatory values and 89% with the more stringent guide values. .
Member States must comply with the mandatory values set out in the Bathing Water Directive but may choose instead to adhere to the stricter(non-binding) guide values. .
From the 357 freshwater areas where bathing was prohibited in 2005,61 complied with at least the mandatory values in 2006, while only 38 moved in the opposite direction.
Compliance with the mandatory values was particularly high at both freshwater and coastal bathing sites, at around 98.2% and 98.3% respectively, and remained stable compared to the previous year 96.3% and 98.5% respectively.
In 2006 bathing was banned in 34 sites that met the mandatory values the previous year and in five previously non-compliant sites.
Cyprus, Croatia, Malta and Greece had excellent reports on their bathing water sites, all with more than 90% of bathing water sites meeting the most stringent guide values(excellent quality), andthe remainder complying with the mandatory values.
Freshwater bathing areas that had been complying with the mandatory values during the 2005 season complied with the more stringent guide values during the 2006 season.
In general, coastal bathing water quality deteriorated between 2009 and2010- the number of bathing water bodies meeting the mandatory values fell by 3.5%, while those meeting guide values fell by 9.5.