Examples of using Multisectoral framework in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
C- The multisectoral framework.
The assessment was based on the 1998 Multisectoral Framework.
The multisectoral framework, prolongation of existing regional aid maps.
Point 1.4 of the multisectoral framework.
The multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects OJ 1998 C 107, p.
This case was the first Commission decision under the 2002 multisectoral framework.
(Art. 87(3), EC; Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects).
See Italy v Commission, paragraph 45.69-See points 1.1 to 1.4 of the multisectoral framework.
Communication from the Commission- Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects.
Multisectoral Framework for large investment projects: strict rules in sectors with structural difficulties.
In paragraphs 90 to 95 of the contested judgment,the Court examined the organisation of points 3.2 to 3.10 of the multisectoral framework.
As the Court states in paragraph 89 of the contested judgment, the multisectoral framework could be understood in the sense claimed by the Commission.
In the judgment under appeal, the Court of First Instance reviewed precisely whether the Commission, in adopting the contested decision,complied with its multisectoral framework of 1998.
According to the 2002 multisectoral framework, Member States have to notify individual aid exceeding a certain threshold which depends on the standard regional aid ceiling applicable in the region concerned.
The Federal Republic of Germany and also Glunz and OSB, supported by the Commission, claim that the Court of First Instancemisapplied Article 87(3) EC and also the multisectoral framework.
Any reference to the economic decline criterion was, in fact,eliminated from the 2002 multisectoral framework, even before the contested judgment was delivered.
(Appeals- State aid- Commission decision not to raise objections- Action for annulment- Admissibility- Interested parties-Regional aid for large investment projects- Multisectoral framework 1998).
In December 2003 the German authorities notified,in accordance with the 1998 Multisectoral Framework, investment aid to E‑Glass AG, Osterweddingen, Saxony‑Anhalt(Germany)- an assisted area under Article 87(3)(a).
The Federal Republic of Germany, by its second ground of appeal, and Glunz and OSB, by their first ground of appeal, supported by the Commission, maintain that the Courtof First Instance misapplied Article 87(3) EC and the multisectoral framework of 1998.
The view that the Commission infringed Article 87 EC and the multisectoral framework, thus vitiating the procedure to review the aid in question, by failing to ascertain, when calculating the competition factor, whether the aid project which had been notified was going to be carried out in a declining market.
The Commission has launched a review of the Community guidelines on regional aid(or‘RAG'),and has the intention to integrate the Multisectoral Framework on regional aid for large investment projects.
In determining whether aid within the multisectoral framework and regional aid for large investment projects is compatible with the common market, the Court of First Instance does not disregard the Commission's broad discretion if it reviews whether the Commission, in adopting the contested decision, complied with that framework, and if it ascertains whether the.
In June, the French authorities notified,under the individual notification requirement provided for by the 2002 multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects, a EUR 48 million aid payment for an investment project by the Total France296.
Joined Cases C-75/05 P and C-80/05 P: Federal Republic of Germany and Others v Kronofrance SA(Appeals- State aid- Commission decision not to raise objections- Action for annulment- Admissibility- Interested parties-Regional aid for large investment projects- Multisectoral framework 1998).
Furthermore, contrary to what the appellants allege, it is clear from reading paragraph 97 of the judgment under appeal that the Court of FirstInstance did not propose interpreting the multisectoral framework of 1998 as meaning that the Commission is obliged to assess in every case whether the market concerned is declining.
Accordingly, the Court held, in paragraph 103 of the contested judgment, that, in applying an adjustment factor equal to 1 to the competition factor without having first ascertained whether the aid project in question would take place in a declining market, the Commission had erred in law,infringing Article 87 EC and the multisectoral framework.
Where the relevant ceiling has been adapted in a particular case, in particular by the application of State aid rules applying in a particular sector, or by an instrument applying to large investment projects,such as the applicable multisectoral framework for regional aid for large investment projects, the adapted ceiling shall apply for the purposes of this paragraph.
As to the substance, in paragraphs 79 to 111 of the judgment under appeal the Court of First Instance found that, by examining the competitive situation in the market in question on the sole basis of the data relating to structural overcapacity, without having at the same time ascertained whether the proposed aid was intended for a declining market,the Commission had infringed Article 87 EC and the multisectoral framework of 1998.
In this context, the Commission noted that the proposed aid intensity of 4.9% is lower than the maximum aidintensity of 8.4% that can be approved under the multisectoral framework rules for large-scale investment projects of this size, that the EEA market share of the recipient for the products concerned does not exceed 25%, and that the investment will not increase EEA-wide production capacity by more than 5%.
By its communication of 1 November 2003 on the modification of the multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects(2002) with regard to the establishment of a list of sectors facing structural problems and on a proposal of appropriate measures pursuant to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty, concerning the motor vehicle sector and the synthetic fibres sector,57the Commission amended point 32 of the 2002 multisectoral framework, with effect from 1 January 2004.
