Examples of using P-values in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
How many p-values I calculated?
P-values and CIs are not to blame.
The correlation coefficients and p-values are presented in Table 2.
A P-values by logrank test.
(2007) such question might center on whether they computed their p-values correctly.
P-values compared to pamidronate.
For all other endpoints, the p-values correspond to a test of differences in hazard rates.
P-values are all adjusted p-values for multiplicity.
TNT creates a concise progression analysis report containing themost important parameters MD increase, p-values, etc.
Order the P-values from smallest to largest.
B p-value for time to deterioration based on stratified log-rank test c p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity.
P-values represent each infliximab treatment group vs. AZA monotherapy.
Median values from Kaplan-Meier analysis; HR and p-values from Cox regression models adjusting for important prognostic factors.
P-values for comparison versus pre-Tx values were computed using paired t-tests.
Follow-up analysis was performed with a datacut-off date of 07 March 2014; all p-values are displayed for descriptive purpose only.
Pairwise comparison p-values:*= p< 0.05 for comparisons of LIFMIOR vs methotrexate.
All p-values are pairwise comparisons of proportions for Humira versus placebo* p< 0.001** p< 0.01.
Pre-Tx= Pre-treatment; SD= Standard Deviation;SDS= Standard Deviation Score[1] P-values for comparison versus pre-Tx values were computed using paired t-tests.
HR and p-values from Cox regression models adjusting for important prognostic factors.
For composite endpoints, the p-values correspond to a test of non-inferiority seeking to show that the hazard ratio is less than 1.3.
P-values< 0.05 comparing pemetrexed/cisplatin to gemcitabine/cisplatin, using Fisher Exact test.
Other studies: p-values compared each efalizumab group with placebo using Fisher's exact test within each study.
P-values were derived from comparison for change from baseline within analysis of covariance model with treatment as term and baseline as covariate.
Other studies: p-values compared each efalizumab group with placebo using Fisher' s exact test within each study. b p< 0.001.
A p-values compared efalizumab with placebo using logistic regression including baseline PASI score, prior treatment for psoriasis and geographical region as covariates.
Pairwise comparison p-values:†= p< 0.05 for comparisons of etanercept+ methotrexate vs. methotrexate and ϕ= p< 0.05 for comparisons of etanercept+ methotrexate vs. etanercept.
All p-values adjusted for multiplicity of testing based on pre-defined hierarchy, except BASDAI 50 and ASDAS-CRP.
The p-values for ORR and Global Health Status/Quality of Life(QoL) scores are descriptive based on the pre-specified multiplicity adjustment plan.
All p-values are adjusted for multiplicity of testing based on pre-defined hierarchy, except for ACR70, Dactylitis and Enthesitis, which were exploratory endpoints.
IMP24011: p-values compared efalizumab with placebo using logistic regression including baseline PASI score, prior treatment for psoriasis and geographical region as covariates.