Examples of using Brussels programme in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It called on the international community to seize the opportunity to translate the Brussels Programme into reality.
The Brussels Programme provides an overall framework and a menu of more than 150 potential actions to be taken by Least Developed Countries.
These arrangements need to be expanded, revitalized or made more effective to take into account the Brussels Programme and its implementation.
Preparations for the comprehensive midterm review of the Brussels Programme by the United Nations General Assembly in 2006 had begun in earnest.
While it was encouraging that ODA tothose countries had grown, it still fell short of the Brussels Programme target.
People also translate
The Brussels Programme should remain the framework for national and international efforts to advance development in the Least Developed Countries.
International financial institutions andthe donor community should renew and redeem their commitments made in the Brussels Programme.
The report also recommended that development partners should integrate the Brussels Programme into their development policies and programmes. .
The third section provides a brief overview of the progress made towards the international goals andtargets contained in the Brussels Programme.
The matter should therefore be given greater attention in implementing the Brussels Programme, the Almaty Programme and the Barbados Programme and Mauritius Strategy.
The Brussels Programme calls for the rate of investment in Least Developed Countries to be raised to 25 per cent and attaches particular importance to investment in infrastructure, including social infrastructure.
In such a context,the commitments to building a global partnership for development embodied in the Brussels Programme need to be reaffirmed and strengthened.
In particular, the partnership that the Brussels Programme embodies must itself be sustained, with mutual recognition of the efforts, successes and challenges of all involved.
To date, 19 United Nations system entities andother multilateral organizations had mainstreamed the Brussels Programme in their own work programmes. .
There is a very high risk that much of the hard-won progress in implementing the Brussels Programme and working towards the Millennium Development Goals will be lost for reasons beyond the control of the countries themselves.
As part of the strengtheningof the public service, the Governments of Least Developed Countries should build the capacity to undertake the longer-term strategic analysis that is required to achieve the objectives of the Brussels Programme.
The least developed countries should give increased attention to their commitment within the Brussels Programme(A/CONF.191/13, chap. II, para. 34) to making reproductive health accessible to all individuals of appropriate ages no later than 2015.
Although there had been improvements in the areas of ODA and debt cancellation, in the current environment the least developed countries were unlikely to achieve the goals andtargets agreed in the Brussels Programme.
Participants emphasized the importance of partnerships in view of the framework stipulated in the Brussels Programme and Millennium Development Goal 8--"Develop a global partnership for development.
While underscoring the primary responsibility of least developed countries for their own development, participants called on developed countries to fulfil their commitments in order tomeet the goals and objectives of the Brussels Programme by 2010.
We also reaffirmed efforts focusing on the development of the least-developed countries,which began with the Brussels Programme during the year of the fifty-fifth session, by adopting the Istanbul Programme of Action in May this year.
The report indicated that, two years after the Brussels Programme was adopted, its implementation remained a challenge for most of the LDCs, especially with regard to the development of sufficient national capacities to implement the BPoA, associated implementation costs, and ownership.
The second section provides an overview of the progress made towards the international goals andtargets contained in the Brussels Programme, which will feed into the preparations of the Fourth Conference.
Since the adoption of the Brussels Programme, there has been a resurgence in international cooperation for development and the emergence of a wide degree of consensus on the actions required to achieve development, as reflected in the Monterrey Consensus and the Johannesburg Programme of Implementation.
The Africa Regional Preparatory Meeting was preceded by the civil society gathering on the review of the implementation of the Brussels Programme, jointly organized by the Office of the High Representative, ECA and LDC Watch, in Addis Ababa on 4 and 5 March 2010.
Additionally, the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries andSmall Island Developing States was invited to express his views on the issue of funds for participation of the least developed countries at the Council sessions of the implementation of the Brussels Programme.
Those countries should be supported with resources andtechnology to reach the targets agreed in the Brussels Programme for increasing computer literacy among students in higher institutions and universities and increasing average telephone density.
Although the Brussels Programme could set those countries on the path to achieving the Millennium Development Goals, her delegation had been somewhat concerned, during the preparations for the midterm review of the Programme's implementation, at the scope of the respective commitments envisaged for the least developed countries and their development partners.
The significant setback of the financial andeconomic crisis for reaching the goals of the Brussels Programme, including the Millennium Development Goals, calls for effective strategies to build the resilience of the least developed countries to various types of shocks.
Furthermore, the latest annual report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of the Brussels Programme(A/61/82-E/2006/74) contains an assessment of the fulfilment by the least developed countries and their development partners of the seven commitments and a quantitative review of progress.