Examples of using Speaking in explanation of position in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. Amorós Núñez(Cuba), speaking in explanation of position, said that the Centre carried out important work and merited continued support.
Speaking in explanation of position after the adoption of the decision, the representative of the United States said that the budgetary figures had been agreed to too rapidly by the Council.
Ms. Méndez Romero(Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela), speaking in explanation of position, said that the world drug problem endangered the health and well-being of citizens and threatened the political stability of States.
Mr. Ben Lagha(Tunisia), speaking in explanation of position, said that mention was made in the twenty-fourth preambular paragraph of international initiatives in response to terrorism.
Mr. Núñez Mosquera(Cuba), speaking in explanation of position, said that his delegation was in favour of the adoption of the draft resolution.
Mr. Ndimeni(South Africa), speaking in explanation of position, said that the question of extreme poverty and hunger was a priority for his country.
Mr. Chumakov(Russian Federation), speaking in explanation of position, said that his delegation supported draft resolution A/C.5/64/L.12 as submitted to the Committee.
Mr. Adsett(Canada), speaking in explanation of position on behalf of the CANZ group(Australia, Canada and New Zealand), expressed satisfaction with the progress achieved on agenda item 80.
Mr. Kitaoka(Japan), speaking in explanation of position, said that his country supported the work of the CEDAW Committee and implemented the provisions of the Convention.
Mr. Ahmad(Pakistan), speaking in explanation of position, said that his country had become a sponsor of the draft resolution as an expression of its support for the work of the Scientific Committee.
Mr. BAUTISTA(Philippines), speaking in explanation of position on behalf of the Association of South-East Asian Nations(ASEAN), said that there was little to disagree with in the contents of the draft resolution.
Mr. Yamada(Japan), speaking in explanation of position, said that there was much room for improvement in the performance of CPC, particularly in the area of its policy coordination mandate.
Mr. Dahmane(Algeria), speaking in explanation of position, said that despite the best efforts of all delegations, it had been difficult to achieve a consensus on the draft resolution.
Ms. Abdelhak(Algeria), speaking in explanation of position, said that her delegation had voted in favour of retaining paragraph 15 because it was a temporary and exceptional measure that would not set a precedent.
Mr. Ozawa(Japan), speaking in explanation of position, said it was regrettable that the Member States had failed to adopt a draft resolution on the scale of assessments, thereby neglecting to provide guidance to the Committee on Contributions.
Mr. Nazarian(Armenia), speaking in explanation of position, recalled the historic significance of the Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes, which had been approved by the General Assembly on 15 November 1982.
Mr. Reyes Rodríguez(Cuba), speaking in explanation of position on the report of the Commission on Human Rights, said that Cuba rejected Commission resolution 2000/25 on the situation of human rights in Cuba.
Mr. Errazuriz(Chile), speaking in explanation of position, said that Chile had made substantive progress in eliminating violence against women through preventive and protective measures.
Ms. Nemroff(United States of America), speaking in explanation of position, said that the draft resolution contained many misstatements of international law and was inconsistent with current State practice.
Mr. Farooq(Pakistan), speaking in explanation of position on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, welcomed the useful and diligent work of CPC and the positive attitude of the negotiating partners during the consideration of the item.
Ms. Pessôa(Brazil), speaking in explanation of position, said that her country fully supported the Scientific Committee and the view that the current critical financial situation should be addressed before taking any decision on the expansion of membership.
Mr. Humenny(Ukraine), speaking in explanation of position, said that the financial mechanism set forth in the draft resolution, while imperfect- it was not financially neutral for some Member States, including Ukraine- was a step in the right direction.
Ms. Spirnak(United States of America), speaking in explanation of position, said that the United States strongly supported the Commission on Sustainable Development and applauded its action-oriented reforms and innovation.
Ms. Perdomo(Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela), speaking in explanation of position, said that although she did not agree with the manner in which the new paragraph had been inserted into the text, her delegation joined the consensus on the draft resolution.
Ms. Lock(South Africa), speaking in explanation of position on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, said that the Group attached great importance to the establishment of clear lines of accountability for the submission, processing and issuance of documentation.
Mr. Percaya(Indonesia), speaking in explanation of position before the decision, said that the right to privacy must be protected and promoted in accordance with article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Mr. Nikolaichik(Belarus), speaking in explanation of position, said that his delegation welcomed the adoption of the draft resolution and that the United Nations should be commended for its role in the dissemination and wider appreciation of international law.
Ms. Taratukhina(Russian Federation), speaking in explanation of position, said that, while her delegation had joined the consensus on the draft resolution, it wished to clarify its interpretation of the new language that had been added to paragraph 17.
Ms. Millicay(Argentina), speaking in explanation of position, said that her delegation had no objection to the language which had been proposed by the representative of Algeria, but for the sake of transparency, it hoped that the Committee would improve its method of work.
Mr. Farid(Saudi Arabia), speaking in explanation of position, asked that the names of staff members with an academic background and previous experience in cost accounting should be provided by the second part of the resumed session.