Examples of using Standard-setting process in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
The target is to speed up standard-setting processes by 50% by 2020;
The standard-setting process is expected to be finalized later this spring.
improving the efficiency of the standard-setting process in Europe.
They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process, win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities.
B: create a European Agency for Standards that would manage the standard-setting process.
Problem 1: the European standard-setting process is not fast enough.
In an appropriate case, it may also be possible to refer to ex ante disclosures of licensing terms in the context of a specific standard-setting process.
For the positive effects of standardisation to fully materialise, the standard-setting process should be transparent and accessible to all interested market players.
accessible appeals mechanism would build trust and improve standard-setting processes;
In these standard-setting processes, it is important that all relevant interests-business, labour, consumer,
regulatory authorities can support its standard-setting process and its result.
Standard-setting processes will be accelerated by 50%
provide input to the IASB standard-setting process.
The third is that the standard-setting process must also be transparent in a way that ensures that stakeholders are able to inform themselves of upcoming,
should be adequately reflected in the IASB's standard-setting process.
legitimate independent international accounting standard-setting process, which is responsive to the public interest
the more important it is to allow equal access to the standard-setting process.
The case shows once more that an effective standard-setting process should take place in a non-discriminatory,
of improving the governance of the standard-setting process.
A competitive standard-setting process, whereby various technology providers compete on merits, supports industrial policy
which is then taken as a standard, extracts an over-inflated value for his title if they conceal their patent during the standard-setting process.
At the same time, the IPR policy should allow IPR holders to exclude specified technology from the standard-setting process and thereby from the commitment to offer to license, providing that exclusion
This process will make use of the instruments10 of the European Standardisation System, and involve a wide range of stakeholders, both within the EU and at international level, to ensure delivery of improved standard-setting processes, in line with the Joint initiative of European Standardisation.
The main negative consequence of a slow standard-setting process is that conflicting national standards continue, which may create
can fully participate in the standard-setting process.
The current procedures for standards development need to be reviewed in order to further speed up the standard-setting process, to ensure a pro-active setting of priorities in subjects to be addressed based on industry
If participation in the standard-setting process is open in the sense that it allows all competitors(and/or stakeholders)
importers- all of whom were not involved in the standard-setting process- as they may need to repackage the product to meet the de facto standard in order to sell in the