Examples of using Standard-setting process in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The target is to speed up standard-setting processes by 50% by 2020;
New performance-based contracts are expected to help speed up the standard-setting process.
Problem 1: the European standard-setting process is not fast enough.
The risk of limitation of innovation is increasedif one or more companies are unjustifiably excluded from the standard-setting process.
The speed and the efficiency of the standard-setting process could constitute such an objective.
Standard-setting processes will be accelerated by 50% so as to respond better to the needs that accompany rapid technological advances.
They believe this could help expedite the Standard-setting process and cover a wider range of transactions e.g. artworks.
In this context, the Governing Board will decidewhether the common forum should become a permanent body with formal responsibilities in the standard-setting process.
This might expedite the Standard-setting process and cover a wider range of transactions.
Of equal importance is to ensure that the EASB governance system is reviewed and adjusted so thatregulatory authorities can support its standard-setting process and its result.
At the same time, the IPR policy should allowIPR holders to exclude specified technology from the standard-setting process and thereby from the commitment to offer to license, providing that exclusion takes place at an early stage in the development of the standard.
The greater the likely market impact of the standard and the wider its potential fields of application,the more important it is to allow equal access to the standard-setting process.
Freunberger, T. Yanagida- Competency Diagnostics in Austria: The Standard-Setting Process- Psychology in Austria, Vol.
The Commission encourages the ESOs to continue their efforts to make the FRAND policy effective andto develop mechanisms to prevent abuses of the standard-setting process.
The main negative consequence of a slow standard-setting process is that conflicting national standards continue, which may create technical barriers in the supply chain or barriers to trade if the national standard is used as a protectionist instrument.
But the full benefits can onlybe harvested if all stakeholders are involved in the standard-setting process, and the standards are also widely used.
He did acknowledge that a minority of respondents argued for the carve-in mechanisms; he provided their perspective that it would help theEU exert greater influence on the IASB's standard-setting process.
A competitive standard-setting process, whereby various technology providers compete on merits, supports industrial policy by ensuring that industrial customers, and ultimately consumers, benefit from standards where technologies are not priced at supra competitive levels.
This requires attempting to find a balance between thesometimes contradictory interests of companies with different business models involved in the standard-setting process.
The Programme covers the activities of developing or providing input to the development of standards, applying,assessing or monitoring standards or overseeing standard-setting processes in support of the implementation of Union policies in the field of financial reporting and auditing.
At the same time, the report draws attention to a negative consequence of this principle: existing deficits in participation by societal stakeholders representing health and safety,consumer and environmental interests in the standard-setting process.
The latter in particular clarifies the key conditions to ensure competitive standard-setting processes and contributes to the objective of building a more efficient standards system for Europe as set out in the Flagship Initiative"An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era" of the Europe 2020 strategy41.
One example of a distortion may be a"patent ambush", whereby the owner of a proprietary technology essential to a standard extracts an artificially inflated ex post(i.e. after a standardis set) value for his patented technology by deliberately concealing his patent during the standard-setting process.
If participation in the standard-setting process is open in the sense that it allows all competitors(and/or stakeholders) in the market affected by the standard to take part in choosing and elaborating the standard, this will lower the risks of a likely restrictive effect on competition by not excluding certain companies from the ability to influence the choice and elaboration of the standard119.
This process will make use of the instruments10 of the European Standardisation System, and involve a wide range of stakeholders, both within the EU and at international level, to ensure delivery of improved standard-setting processes, in line with the Joint initiative of European Standardisation.