Примеры использования Application was dismissed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The application was dismissed.
They applied to have their sentences commuted to life sentences, but their application was dismissed on 31 July 1997.
The application was dismissed.
After the judgement of the High Court of Eastern Denmark, the complainant indeed applied for leave to appeal. On 5 December 2006, his application was dismissed.
The application was dismissed.
This court's proceedings were written and there were no public orprivate hearings. The application was dismissed on 21 April 1999.
The application was dismissed on 30 June 1998.
The officer determined that the complainant would not be at risk of life, extreme sanctions or inhuman treatment upon return to Iraq.On 28 June 1999, the complainant's application was dismissed.
This application was dismissed on 2 March 2004.
According to the author, this test was conducted byan expert"whose connections with the former communist regime could not be excluded". On 2 September 1993, based on the results of the test, the author's application was dismissed.
The application was dismissed on 23 March 2006.
Finally, following the Committee's Views in the present case,the author appealed to the Constitutional Court, but his application was dismissed as it firstly had to be examined within administrative proceedings.
This application was dismissed on 3 December 1999.
The Trial Chamber granted a one-day stay of the release, pending any application to appeal.On 5 April 2000, the prosecution sought leave to appeal the Trial Chamber's decision; the application was dismissed by a Bench of the Appeals Chamber on 19 April 2000.
Reportedly, this application was dismissed on 19 May 2000.
In order to be successful, the application must demonstrate that the person would suffer excessive hardship if he had to return to his country of origin to apply for permanent residence in Canada.On 7 July 2003, this application was dismissed.
The application was dismissed on 21 September 2000 on the grounds that it was clearly unfounded.
The State party submits that although the author did file for leave to apply for judicial review of the IRB decision, his application was dismissed due to his failure to file an Application Record the supporting documentation required for the application. .
The application was dismissed because the matter had already been decided by the Federal Court.
He arrived in Sweden on 26 October 1995 in poor psychological condition. On 10 January 1996,he applied for asylum. His application was dismissed by the Swedish Board of Immigration on 5 September 1996. The Aliens Appeal Board turned down his appeal on 21 April 1997.
The stay application was dismissed and an order recognizing and enforcing the award was entered.
On 23 August 1999, the author filed a motion in Federal Court seeking a mandatory injunction for the delivery of urgent medical care.On 14 September 1999, the application was dismissed. On 1 November 1999, the author claims that all his lawsuits in Federal Court(unspecified) were stayed.
The application was dismissed by a decision of the Bureau dated 11 June 2004 and the defence case was rescheduled for 20 to 22 July 2004.
The author acknowledges that she applied to the European Court of Human Rights under article 3(prohibition of torture) and article 8(right to respect for private and family life)but maintains that her application was dismissed because at the time, she had informed the Court that she was awaiting the decision from the Home Office on her application for"discretionary leave" or"temporary protection.
On 14 April 1989, the application was dismissed by the Court, which declared itself incompetent to deal with the matter on the basis of res judicata.
The application was dismissed on 10 July on the grounds that it was not a"decision", as the Minister has no power to review a decision made pursuant to section 501(2) of the Act.
On 10 September 1993,the author applied for a position with the Regional Prosecutor of Pilsen. His application was dismissed on 24 March 1994, with reference to the unsatisfactory results of his personality test. On 7 April 1994, the author filed a constitutional complaint claiming that the dismissal of his job application by the Regional Prosecutor violated article 26, paragraph 2, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, according to which the conditions and restrictions for certain professions and activities may be defined by law.
The application was dismissed as inadmissible by the European Court of Human Rights on the basis that it"did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.
The application was dismissed by the Superior Court of Québec. The author's representative appealed to the Court of Appeal of Québec on 17 October 1991. On 25 May 1992, he abandoned his appeal, considering that, in the light of the Court's jurisprudence, it was bound to fail.
His application was dismissed by a decision dated 8 February 1999, as the author failed to prove that there was a well-founded fear of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion if he were to be returned to his country of origin.