Примеры использования Author was forced на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
As a result, the author was forced to resign.
The author was forced to put his thumbprint on the document.
In 1990, during the war between the“Indian peacekeeping forces” and the Tamil Tigers(Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam- LTTE), the author was forced to work for the Tigers.
In February 1987, the author was forced to do his military service.
The author owned an apartment building in Prague-Vinohrady with a parcel of land(No. 2913), as well as several other parcels of land(No. 1011/1-2, and1012) in Kunratice(a suburb of Prague). On 28 November 1961, the author was forced to cede his apartment building to the State.
After that incident, the author was forced to leave his home during the day.
The author alleges a violation of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, in that he was denied a fair hearing by the Supreme Court and that, in dealing with his case, the Supreme Court did not act as an independent andimpartial tribunal inasmuch as the author was forced to accept whatever order was directed by the Court.
As a result, the author was forced to accept leave without pay as from 15 July 2007.
In the present case, the Committee notes counsel's various arguments which, in his view,explain why the author was forced to wait until 2004 to submit the communication to the Committee see paragraph 3.7.
The author was forced to speak with the Embassy staff through an interpreter, despite speaking Swedish almost fluently.
It is submitted that the State party violated the author's right to a family life because,in the light of the impossibility to practise law in Nice, the author was forced to temporarily leave his home and take up residence and practise law in Dakar, so as to be able to provide for his family.
The author was forced to pay for the 8 x 8 ft area in which he slept and financially to support the eight others with him.
While it could be proportionate to refuse a person a passport in his own country while criminal procedures are pending,in the present case the author was forced by the State party to return to his country to stand criminal investigation although the State party was aware of his difficult financial situation.
The mere fact that the author was forced to communicate with his wife's lawyer constitutes per se a violation of his freedom of thought and expression.
On 11 April 1997, after two days of detention, the author was forced to sign an extrajudicial confession, in which he admitted to having raped and killed one Mebelyn Gaznan.
After the seventh month of his detention, the author was forced to write a confession, stating that he was a Maoist activist, that the RNA had seized documents related to the Communist Party of Nepal(Maoist) from him, and that he now wanted to"surrender.
Moreover, nothing demonstrates that the author was forced to testify against himself, as he had never admitted guilt regarding any of the charges laid against him.
The Committee further observes that the author was forced to change lawyers numerous times due to the pressures of settling for monetary compensation instead of the restitution of the property; and that the author suffered severe prejudice in relation both to her domestic violence complaint and her property-related lawsuits, by the action of the legal aid lawyers assigned to her case.
And, because of the exclusions referred to in(c)and(d) above, the authors were forced to sell their compensation vouchers on the Hungarian stock exchange where they traded for less than half their face value.
In cases Nos. 623/, 624/, 626/ and 627/1995(Domukovsky and others v. Georgia),it was uncontested that the authors were forced to be absent during long periods of the trial, and that Mr. Domukovsky was unrepresented for part of the trial, whereas both Mr. Tsiklauri and Mr. Gelbakhiani were represented by lawyers whose services they had refused, and were not allowed to conduct their own defence or to be represented by lawyers of their choice.
According to the author, this person was forced to reveal the names of the other cell members.
In the present case, the author considers that he was forced to change his name to comply with Lithuanian spelling.
It is also noted that the author claims that she was forced into a sighe or mutah marriage and to have committed and been sentenced to stoning for adultery.
Khalilova v. Tajikistan the author contended that her son was forced to admit guilt, on at least two occasions during the investigation, on national television.
In a letter dated 5 June 2003, the author reiterates that her son was forced to join the gang of Yorov but did not commit any crimes.
The author maintains that he was forced to accept his"services" since he was not consulted at any point whether he wanted to be represented by him or whether he was satisfied by his work.
The author alleges that he was forced to sign a confession, as when he asked for some food and water, he was told that he would receive food and water only if he signed a confession.
The author claims that his family was forced to leave the apartment in Zagreb because they had received death threats from unknown people and feared for their lives as Croatian Serbs.
Furthermore, her counsel submitted a written statement to the Migration Court, dated 1 April 2009, in which the author claims that she was forced to move out of her parents' home upon her return to Bangladesh, because her father allegedly became furious, and threatened and beat her.
The author claims that she was forced into a so-called sighe or mutah marriage, which is a short-term marriage, in the present case stipulated for a period of one and a half years, and is recognized legally only by Shia Muslims.