Примеры использования Author was entitled на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee considered that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy including compensation.
As to the issue ofexhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee notes that the State party identifies three distinct avenues of domestic redress that the author was entitled to pursue.
The Committee stated in its Views that the author was entitled to an"effective remedy.
The author was entitled to seek judicial review of the RRT decision; however he did not do so.
Furthermore, in its response, the State party had indicated that the author was entitled to file an appeal for compensation.
It decided that the author was entitled to an effective remedy, including compensation.
In case No. 1123/2002(Correia de Matos v. Portugal), where the Committee found a violation of the right to defend oneself(art. 14, para. 3(d)),the Committee considered that the author was entitled to an effective remedy under article 2, paragraph 3 a.
The Committee concluded that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including commutation of his death sentence.
In case No. 1439/2005(Aber v. Algeria), concerning violations of article 7 and of article 9, paragraphs 1 and 3, read alone and in conjunction with article 2, paragraph 3, and of article 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant,the Committee considered that the author was entitled, in accordance with article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, to an effective remedy.
It decided that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including compensation and either a retrial or release.
In another case, No. 765/1997(Fábryová v. the Czech Republic),although the State party itself recognized that the author was entitled to restitution, the latter was finally not able to obtain restitution due to procedural rules.
It decided that the author was entitled to an effective remedy, including compensation, and assurance of the enjoyment of his civil and political rights.
In case No. 1274/2004(Korneenko et al. v. Belarus) regarding a violation of article 22, paragraph 1,the Committee considered that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including the re-establishment of"Civil Initiatives" and compensation.
The Committee considered that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including reestablishment of Civil Initiatives and compensation, and that the State party should avoid similar violations in future.
I note that the judge who heard the third case ruled that,since the first two suits had not been examined on the merits, the author was entitled to bring that new action, which would therefore not constitute an abuse of legal process, as the respondents had claimed.
He did not enter a plea and the judge thus entered a plea of not guilty to two counts of kidnapping with serious illegal detention. On 16 October 1997, the Supreme Court temporarily restrained this judge from proceeding with the case to prevent the issues before the court from becoming moot. On 27 October 1997,the Supreme Court set aside the inquest investigation and held that the author was entitled to a proper preliminary investigation.
The Human Rights Committee stated that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including effective reinstatement to public service and to his post, with all the consequences that implied, or, if necessary, to a similar post.
In case No. 889/1999(Zheikov v. Russian Federation), where the Committee found a violation of article 7 read together with article 2,the Committee declared that the author was entitled to an effective remedy, including completion of the investigation into his treatment, if still pending, as well as compensation.
The prosecutor denied this request,arguing that the author was entitled only to an inquest investigation. On 19 September 1997, author's counsel appealed to the Court of Appeals to prevent the filing of criminal information against the author. .
As regards the author's claim that article 9, paragraph 4, encompasses a right to legal assistance in order tohave access to the courts, the Committee notes from the material before it that the author was entitled to legal assistance from the day he requested asylum and would have had access to it, had he requested it.
Discrimination in the exercise of her rights, since although the author was entitled to a therapeutic abortion, none was carried out because of social attitudes and prejudices, thus preventing her from enjoying her right to life, to health, to privacy and to freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment on an equal footing with men;
Following a 2006 communication alleging a violation of the right to a fair trial under the ICCPR through the denial of the right to represent oneself in judicial proceedings,the HR Committee found that the author was entitled to an effective remedy under article 2, paragraph 3(a) of the Covenant.
In a supplementary judgement of 13 September 2002, the District Court established that the author was entitled to use the flat, but ruled that it was not competent to establish whether she was entitled to the exclusive use of the flat since she had not submitted a request to that effect.
In case No. 1442/2005(Kwok v. Australia), involving violations of article 9, paragraph 1, with respect to the author's detention and potential violations of articles 6 and 7 in the event the State party removed the author to China,the Committee concluded that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy, including protection from removal without adequate assurances as well as adequate compensation for the length of the detention to which the author was subjected.
It reiterates that in its notes of 8 February and14 May 2002, the U.S. Department of Justice stated that the author was entitled, in its opinion, to make use of all remedies available under the American legal system to challenge the decision for a reduction and re-fixing of the sentence, which would subsequently enable him to appeal the entire judgment.
In case No. 829/1998(Judge v. Canada), where the author was deported from Canada to the United States of America,the Committee concluded that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy which would include making such representations as are possible to the receiving State to prevent the carrying out of the death penalty on the author. .
It does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
It does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
The State party does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
Pursuant to article 2,subparagraph 3(a), of the Covenant, the author is entitled to an effective remedy, entailing compensation for the ill-treatment suffered.