Примеры использования Board noted a number на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
At UNICEF, the Board noted a number of deficiencies in relation to competitive bidding.
The Board noted that UNFPA had not reviewed the data entered in its nationally executed audit management system, while the Board noted a number of discrepancies in the nationally executed audit management system, including that.
In addition, the Board noted a number of deficiencies in the budget computation methods ibid. paras. 35 and 36.
Based upon its work in missions and offices away from Headquarters, and drawing on assistance and insight from the Office of Internal Oversight Services,as well as the results of the Administration's pre-implementation reviews, the Board noted a number of consistent themes and concerns emerging across all locations.
The Board noted a number of shortcomings in selected offices away from Headquarters that were evaluated, as discussed in paragraph 174.
In its previous report(A/65/5/Add.3, paras. 201-207), the Board noted a number of weaknesses in the Agency's information technology environment and made several recommendations.
The Board noted a number of procurement weaknesses, including a considerable number of waivers of competitive bidding without adequate justification, weaknesses in solicitation processes, non-performance of vendor evaluations and instances where conflicts of interest were not considered by the contract review committees.
During the current audit, the Board noted a number of deficiencies in relation to the completion of vendor performance reports, as follows.
The Board noted a number of weaknesses, including lack of progress since the process was introduced in 2005; absence of a proactive process within UNFPA to encourage the self-declared country offices to fully implement the residual processes of certification through the NEX Unit and ineffective monitoring of the implementation of the harmonized approach to cash transfers.
In its previous report(A/63/9,annex IX), the Board noted a number of discrepancies between the assets recorded in the fixed-asset register and the physical assets on hand.
The Board noted a number of safety shortcomings in mission disaster recovery rooms and at data centres.
In its previous report(A/65/5/Add.10, chap. II, paras.280-325), the Board noted a number of asset management weaknesses at UNOPS, including inadequate maintenance of asset registers and inadequate physical verification procedures.
The Board noted a number of discrepancies between the assets recorded in the fixed asset register and the physical assets on hand.
In its previous report(A/65/5/Add.7, paras. 253-267), the Board noted a number of weaknesses in asset management, including late submission of asset certifications; asset locations not detailed in the asset register; disposed-of assets not removed from the asset register; and assets not tagged.
The Board noted a number of trust funds with balances that were not used or used only minimally to fund expenditure during the biennium.
The Board noted a number of irregularities in the period under review which included on an overall basis a persistent underutilization of total flight hours vis-à-vis budgeted hours.
Although the Board noted a number of areas for improvement at United Nations Headquarters, the United Nations Office at Nairobi, ESCAP and ECLAC, it is of the opinion that the general controls surrounding IMIS are satisfactory.
At UNFPA Uzbekistan, the Board noted a number of instances where consultants were appointed on a special service agreement, even though their responsibilities involved performing functions that were part of the UNFPA continuing business or mandate.
In its previous report(A/67/5/Add.7), the Board noted a number of weaknesses in asset management, including asset certifications that were submitted late by the country offices; some country offices did not perform physical asset counts, some assets were not recorded in the asset register and, in other instances, there was no evidence that the results of the physical count were reconciled to the asset register.
In this regard, the Board notes a number of examples where members of IPSAS implementation teams have been brought into core finance and accounting teams to enhance continuity and capacity.
The Board however noted a number of insufficient monitoring activities in project implementation across entities.
The Board had noted a number of areas where programme management could be improved, for example in ITC, UNEP and UNHCR.
The Board has noted a number of other risks that the Fund will have to address, if it is to implement IPSAS by 2012.
The Board also noted a number of issues related to operational aspects of the future field representation scheme, including that of remaining within the limits of existing budgetary resources and of a phased-in approach.
Furthermore, the Board noted that a number of prospective vendors had not submitted the information required for the evaluation.
The Board also noted that a number of regional programmes have been extended.
The Board noted that a number of original copies of special service agreements were not on file at the country office in the Philippines.
The Board noted that a number of delegations to the Conference on Disarmament were also supportive of the establishment of a high-level panel of eminent persons.
The Board also noted that a number of important technical issues required close attention during the comprehensive review of pensionable remuneration, including.
With regard to treasury management, the Board noted problems in a number of funds and programmes with financial records, including bank reconciliations.