Примеры использования Case demonstrates на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This case demonstrates the full scope of terrorist exploitation of the Internet.
As to the Speedy Trial Act of 1998,the author maintains that her own case demonstrates that such cases last for many years before they are concluded in court.
The case demonstrates yet another critical trend caused by an external factor.
Canada indicated that while it was not able to comment further as the matter was still before the courts, the case demonstrates the effectiveness of the mechanisms which Canada has put in place to prosecute those who breach Convention obligations.
This case demonstrates the complicity of certain agents, on both sides of the border.
The first clinical case demonstrates the family aggregation of OP and DM, which extends through the female line.
This case demonstrates the use of a legitimate business as a money exchanger for narcotics traffickers.
The source considers that this case demonstrates the way in which dissidents are criminalized on the grounds of antisocial behaviour.
The case demonstrates that Al-Qaida has the knowledge to employ hazardous chemicals and to obtain them from commercial sources.
The High Court found against the Applicant, however the case demonstrates that citizens, including those on remand, can use the Courts to raise questions relating to their fundamental rights as provided under the Constitution.
The case demonstrates the considerable staffing and material resources needed to deal with complex cases against big corporations.
However, this case demonstrates that in certain cases it is possible to push for a quick decision.
This case demonstrates some of the challenges of varied interpretations as well as misinterpretations of the right to self-determination in the country.
The case demonstrates the difficulty that individuals face in resisting extradition from the UK and underlines the need to ensure as full a defence as possible is presented to the court.
This case demonstrates the ongoing power struggle between the signatories and the non-signatories to the Darfur Peace Agreement and the frequent changes in their respective areas of control.
This case demonstrates that stability and peace can be nurtured by responding quickly, developing and implementing sound programmes, effectively mobilizing resources and building local partnerships.
This case demonstrates the inadequacy of the Special Criminal Court in holding the appropriate high-level officials accountable, and the failure of police to conduct proper investigation.
This case demonstrates the applicability of the doctrine of monopoly leveraging(exploiting monopoly power on one market to acquire or defend monopoly power on a separate but related market) to IPR exploitation.
This case demonstrates that Congolese airspace can be properly supervised only if the crews of individual aircraft are willing to contact flight controllers and follow established aviation procedures.
Presented clinical case demonstrates the ability to achieve long-term remission using B-raf inhibitor vemurafenib in the treatment of patient with relapses of anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and with the V600E BRAF mutation in tumor.
This case demonstrates the complementary nature of competition and consumer policies and the role of cooperation between relevant authorities in identifying appropriate remedies to address market failures in favour of consumers.
Our case demonstrates the need for change in the multilateral financial institutions so that they can cooperate in the development of the less-well-endowed nations and help to fight poverty and generate true options for progress.
This clinical case demonstrates that changes in cardiac output arising from cardiac arrhythmias affect the activity of brain structures, causing a decline in their functional activity that manifested in paroxysmal slow waves following the episode of cardiac arrhythmia.
The case demonstrated the power of forensic psychiatry.
That case demonstrated the existence of a number of institutional and procedural gaps.
These cases demonstrate persisting bias in favour of men candidates.
The case demonstrated that the Icelandic authorities took discrimination very seriously and were determined to punish anyone found guilty in that regard.
This case demonstrated that the Constitutional Court properly considered the ECHR in practice and took account of its jurisprudence, with its specific reference to the case of Konstantin Markin v.
According to the panellist from Colombia this case demonstrated that, while the Convention concentrated on cooperation in criminal matters, it did not close the door on other forms of cooperation.
This case demonstrated that the foundations of the Fifth Republic are still strong, even though they are subjected to serious external attacks.