Примеры использования Certain questions relating на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
This approach was reiterated seven years later in the Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
That was also the rule enshrined in article 4 of the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
We wish to draw attention to certain questions relating to the implementation of the decisions taken at the Cairo Conference.
This principle was confirmed by article 1 of the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
The Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws entered into force in 1937, seven years after its adoption.
NO, SE Convention between Norway and Sweden on Certain Questions relating to the Law on Watercourses.
During the period preceding the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations and the founding of the United Nations, only a limited number of States had concluded the first international agreements regulating,in one way or another, certain questions relating to nationality.
The experience of the past 25 years had raised certain questions relating, among other things, to the financing of South-South cooperation.
International law does not prohibit dual or multiple nationality: indeed such nationality was given approval by article 3 of the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, which provides.
The 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws declares in article 4 that.
Norway welcomed UNHCR's expressed desire to explore new approaches to funding and to reconsider certain questions relating to UNHCR's operating methods.
Presidential Decree of 17 June 1999"On certain questions relating to the State Commission to Combat Drug Addiction and Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs.
One of the first such universal agreements, together with the protocols on statelessness,was the Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws of 12 April 1930.
This is in line with the Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws of 12 April 1930, as well as international practice and jurisprudence notably the Nottebohm case.
This principle received some support from article 5 of the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, which provides.
For example, article 1 of the Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws of 1930 provides that"it is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals.
Among the multilateral treaties relating to this problem are the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, See note 50 above.
This was already recognized in article 1 of The Hague Convention of 1930 on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, which provides that, while it is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals, such law shall be recognized by other States only insofar as it is consistent with international conventions, international custom and the principles of law generally recognized with regard to nationality. See note 50 above.
Among the multilateral treaties relating to this problem the following instruments must be mentioned:the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, See note 60 above.
Article 1 of The Hague Convention of 1930 on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws provides that, while it is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals, such law shall be recognized by other States only“insofar as it is consistent with international conventions, international custom and the principles of law generally recognized with regard to nationality”. See Laws concerning nationality, United Nations Legislative Series, ST/LEG/SER. B/4, p. 567.
Decision No. 17 of 22 December 2000 of the plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan on certain questions relating to the application by the courts of legislation on marriage and the family when considering cases involving the adoption of children.
In particular, it was noted that the draft article could have contained a specific reference to the domestic law of States,as had been the case in the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws.
This principle was endorsed by the 1930 Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, which provides in article 4 that.
According to the finding made by the Supreme Court of Canada,which has already considered a matter similar to the one before the Court,"international law does not specifically grant component parts of sovereign states the legal right to secede unilaterally from their'parent' state" Reference by the GovernorGeneral concerning Certain Questions relating to the Secession of Quebec from Canada, 1998, S.C.R., Vol. 2, p. 217, para. 111; emphasis added.
Decision of the plenum of 28 April 2000 of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan on certain questions relating to the application by the courts of legislation on marriage and the family when considering cases involving the adoption of children.
Article 1 of The Hague Convention of 1930 on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws provides that, while it is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals, such law shall be recognized by other States only"insofar as it is consistent with international conventions, international custom and the principles of law generally recognized with regard to nationality". See Laws concerning nationality, United Nations Legislative Series, ST/LEG/SER. B/4, p. 567.
In connection with the introduction of habeas corpus into domestic law and the abolition of the death penalty,in 2007, the Plenum of the Supreme Court handed down decisions on certain questions relating to the imposition of life imprisonment and the use by the courts of remand in custody during pretrial investigations.
The problems resulting from dual nationality are addressed in the above-mentioned 1930 Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws and its Protocol relating to Military Obligations in Certain Cases of Dual Nationality of 1930, in the Arab League Convention on Nationality of 1954 and in the Convention on Reduction of Cases of Multiple Nationality and Military Obligations in Cases of Multiple Nationality, concluded between the States members of the Council of Europe in 1963.