Примеры использования Comparability of efforts на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
National circumstances and comparability of efforts.
The comparability of efforts[shall][should] be ensured through.
National circumstances and comparability of efforts.
On comparability of efforts and national circumstances, Parties proposed that.
Due consideration should be given to comparability of efforts between large and small Parties.
Comparability of efforts by developed country Parties and national circumstances;
Proposed new subheading: Comparability of efforts between large and small Parties.
Ensure that aggregated GHG emissions after 2013 do not exceed countries' QELROs while ensuring comparability of efforts(Japan, MISC.5/Add.2);
In assessing comparability of efforts by[developed country Parties], the following factors[shall][should] be taken into account.
Parties noted the importance of ensuring comparability of efforts among developed countries.
Ensuring the comparability of efforts among developed country Parties, taking into account differences in their national circumstances;
Some Parties considered measuring, reporting andverifying to be a means to address the issue of comparability of efforts and responsibilities.
The difference between comparability of efforts and comparability of targets was noted in some interventions.
The SBSTA also acknowledged that the identification of common elements for measuring the progress made towards the achievement of the quantified economy-wide emission reduction targets will contribute to ensuring the comparability of efforts among developed country Parties.
Parties also addressed the issue of comparability of efforts and recalled the views expressed at the first session of the AWG-LCA.
All developed country Parties[shall] adopt legally binding mitigation commitments including economy-wide quantified emission reduction objectives for the period from[2013] until 2020,while ensuring comparability of efforts among them, taking into account differences in their national circumstances.
Some Parties reiterated the importance of ensuring comparability of efforts among developed countries taking into account their capacities and national circumstances.
Measurable, reportable and verifiable nationally appropriate mitigation commitments or actions, including quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives, by all developed country Parties,while ensuring the comparability of efforts among them, taking into account differences in their national circumstances;
The IAR process aims to promote the comparability of efforts among all developed countries with regard to their quantified economy-wide emission limitation and reduction targets.
The SBSTA agreed to undertake further work in 2014 on identifying common elements, with regard to the elements referred to in decision 2/CP.17, paragraph 5, for measuring the progress made towards the achievement of thequantified economy-wide emission reduction targets as contained in document FCCC/SB/2011/INF.1/Rev.1, and on ensuring comparability of efforts among developed country Parties, taking into account differences in their national circumstances.
Parties also addressed the issue of comparability of efforts and recalled the views expressed at the first session of the AWG-LCA.7 Some Parties were of the view that the discussion should consider comparability between commitment periods as well.
Using a sectoral bottom-up approach to set ambitious and feasible national emission reduction targets for developed countries(QELROs)(Japan, MISC.4(the submission identifies steps to establish comparable national emission reduction targets) andMISC.5/Add.2); ensuring comparability of efforts by applying methodologies that use indicators such as energy efficiency or GHG intensity(Japan, MISC.5 and MISC.5/Add.2)(see also chapter III E);
In view of the need to ensure comparability of efforts, the development of quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives should be guided by considerations of capability and responsibility, taking into account such factors as.
The AWG-KP took note of the exchange of information on mitigation potential and comparability of efforts among Annex I Parties through voluntary submissions and workshops hosted by Parties.
Ensuring comparability of efforts in a transparent manner among developed countries mitigation efforts will require the establishment of specific indicators in order to compare compliance with country commitments and define which national circumstances are taken into consideration.
Recognizing that the international assessment andreview process should promote the comparability of efforts among all developed country Parties, including in relation to their quantified economy-wide emission limitation and reduction targets.
Ensuring comparability of efforts in a transparent manner among mitigation efforts of[developed country][Annex I] Parties will require the establishment of specific indicators in order to compare compliance with commitments and define which national circumstances are taken into consideration.
The main issues under discussion relate to the need for clarity on the outstanding political questions pertaining to a second commitment period and the rules andconcerns regarding continuity of the Kyoto Protocol and comparability of efforts and achievements to date relating to greenhouse gas emission reductions by annex I parties. In reference to common metrics, parties have made progress towards an agreement on key technical issues on new gases, with options clearly identified and ready for a political decision.
Some Parties also suggested that the comparability of efforts should be based on a benchmark against which all Parties measure progress; that such a benchmark should be based on a common base year and a common metric for measuring emissions reductions; and that reductions should be based on national targets.
In view of the need to account for diverse national circumstances and to ensure comparability of efforts, the development of quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives{should}{shall} be based on robust, relevant, impartial and credible indicators, taking into account such factors as.