Примеры использования Concerning maritime delimitation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Qatar v. Bahrain, concerning maritime delimitation and territorial questions.
The cases on which the Court recently rendered its final judgments include a dispute concerning maritime delimitation.
Judge ad hoc in the case concerning maritime delimitation and territorial questions Qatar/Bahrain.
On 3 February 2009, the International Court of Justice rendered a unanimous Judgment in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea Romania v. Ukraine.
Case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain Qatar v. Bahrain.
Counsel and Advocate for Romania in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea 2004.
Case concerning Maritime Delimitation between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea Nicaragua v. Honduras.
Judge ad hoc in the International Court of Justice, in the case concerning maritime delimitation and territorial questions Qatar/Bahrain.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine), the Court extended the time limit for the submission of Ukraine's rejoinder.
Agent for Honduras before the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea Nicaragua v. Honduras.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Costa Rica chose Mr. Simma to sit as judge ad hoc.
In addition, in September, the Court held hearings on the merits in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea Romania v. Ukraine.
In the case concerning maritime delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine), the Court again had to make a determination as to the value of an interpretative declaration.
As from 1991,he was the Judge ad hoc chosen by Qatar in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen(Denmark v. Norway), Denmark has chosen Mr. Paul Henning Fischer to sit as judge ad hoc.
The Court held hearings on questions of jurisdiction andadmissibility in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain in February and March.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine), Romania chose Jean-Pierre Cot and Ukraine Bernard H. Oxman to sit as judges ad hoc.
In the period under review, the Court received an Application in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine) which is in preparation for printing.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine), Romania chose Jean Pierre Cot and Ukraine Bernard H. Oxman to sit as judges ad hoc.
On 1 July 1994, the International Court of Justice delivered a judgment on jurisdiction andadmissibility in the Case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain(Qatar v. Bahrain), Qatar has chosen Mr. José Maria Ruda and Bahrain Mr. Nicolas Valticos to sit as judges ad hoc.
In addition, Mr. Muigai noted that Somalia had instituted proceedings against Kenya at the International Court of Justice with regard to a dispute concerning maritime delimitation in the Indian Ocean.
It delivered a Judgment on the merits in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen(Denmark v. Norway) I.C.J. Reports 1993, p. 38.
On 25 February 2014, Costa Rica filed an application instituting proceedings against Nicaragua with regard to a"[d]ispute concerning maritime delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean.
Agent and Counsel for the State of Bahrain in the Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions(Qatar v. Bahrain) before the International Court of Justice, 1991-1995.
In the case concerning Maritime Delimitation between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea(Nicaragua v. Honduras), Nicaragua chose Mr. Giorgio Gaja and Honduras Mr. Julio González Campos to sit as judges ad hoc.
By an order dated 1 April 2014, the Court fixed time limits for the filing of the initial written pleadings in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)(see paras. 197-208 below);
Its judgment in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine) had been adopted unanimously and, uniquely in the Court's history, without any opinions or declarations by individual judges appended to the decision.
In the course of this year, the Court has already delivered two important decisions relating to shared bodies of water between States, namely,that in the cases concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine) and Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights Costa Rica v. Nicaragua.
In 1993, in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen, the Court had analysed an award handed down in 1977 by the Anglo-French Arbitral Tribunal regarding the Mer d'Iroise case, adopting the award's reasoning.