Примеры использования Considered article на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group considered article 54.
At its 2nd and 5th meetings, on 30 October and9 November 1995, the working group considered article 15.
Many delegations considered article 1 somewhat vague.
Recalling its discussion of article 61(see para. 42 above),the Working Group considered article 55.
Her delegation considered article 33 on the settlement of disputes to be too restricting.
Люди также переводят
At its 4th and 5th plenary meetings, on 6 and 9 November 1995,the working group considered article 18.
The working group considered article 17 at its 4th and 5th plenary meetings, on 6 and 9 November 1995.
For this and other reasons the International Law Commission declined to adopt such a rule in 1977 when it considered article 22 in the draft articles on State responsibility first reading.
The Working Group considered article 1(1) as contained in paragraph 8 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.169.
Mr. CHOUKRI SBAI(Observer for Morocco) considered article 6 to be vital to the model law.
The Commission considered article 3 of the draft convention on transparency as set out in paragraph 5 of document A/CN.9/812.
At its 3rd meeting, on 21 January 1997, the working group considered article 10, as contained in the annex to document E/CN.4/1996/102.
The Working Group considered article 5 as contained in paragraph 38 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.176, which provided for submission by a non-disputing Party to the treaty.
At its 2nd meeting,on 15 January 1996, the working group considered article 3, as contained in the annex to document E/CN.4/1995/96.
Several Governments considered article 7 useful as it clearly indicated that States had certain prerogatives regarding the attribution of their nationality in relation to State succession. A/CN.4/483, para. 18.
In Laska andLika v. Albania, the European Court of Human Rights considered article 35 as reflecting international law relevant to the case.
The Working Group considered article 1(2) of the rules as contained in paragraph 10 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.166.
It preferred option 1 in article 10, on the role of the Security Council, and considered article 12 a good basis for a compromise concerning the role of the Prosecutor.
The working group considered article 16 at its 2nd, 3rd and 5th plenary meetings, on 30, 31 October and 9 November 1995.
Mr. YEPEZ MARTINEZ(Venezuela) said that his delegation considered article 14 to be unnecessary since its substance appeared elsewhere in the Statute.
The Commission considered article 8 of the draft convention on transparency as set out in paragraph 5 of document A/CN.9/812 and took note of the previous deliberations of the Working Group on that article see A/CN.9/794, paras. 168-170, and A/CN.9/799, paras. 74 and 129-133.
At its 3rd meeting, on 21 January 1997, the working group considered article 8, as contained in the annex to document E/CN.4/1996/102, which read as follows.
However, Egypt considered article 21 fundamental to ensure the necessary balance between the need for an efficient Subcommittee mechanism on the one hand and the requirements of State sovereignty on the other hand.
The panel then proceeded to explain why it considered article 1.1 of the SCM Agreement to be a special rule of international law.
The Working Group considered article 1 as contained in paragraph 7 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.176 and, further to its agreement to proceed with outstanding substantive issues, proceeded to address paragraph(1) of article 1.
Opt-in or opt-out solution The Working Group considered article 1(1) of the draft rules as contained in paragraph 10 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.166.
His delegation considered article 3 to be in contradiction with the principle of equitable and reasonable utilization and participation enshrined in the 1997 Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, which should remain the universally applicable, authoritative legal instrument with regard to shared freshwater resources.
At its 2nd meeting, on 2 February 1998, the working group considered article 6 of the draft optional protocol, as contained in E/CN.5/1997/96, which read as follows.
The Working Group considered article 3 of the revised draft proposal, as set out above in paragraph 51.
The Working Group considered article 8(2)(c), as contained in paragraph 45 of A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.169.