Примеры использования Controller explained на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Controller explained that this was mainly due to the high level of earmarking.
When it was envisaged in 1970 to have a single carrier offering a comprehensive coverage,the Office of the Controller explained in a memorandum the decision not to go for competitive bidding as follows.
The Controller explained that UNHCR's budget planning must accommodate continuously evolving needs and emergencies.
Responding to a question about compliance at the Field level andensuring that staff have adequate capacity to adhere to IPSAS, the Controller explained that a number of training initiatives and regional capacity-building workshops were taking place in all five regions.
The Controller explained that the Board of Auditors had reviewed UNHCR's management of implementing partners during the preceding three years.
With respect to the introduction of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS), the Controller explained that the Board of Auditors' position appeared to differ from that of the United Nations IPSAS Steering Committee, concerning a phased approach to the implementation of the standards.
The Controller explained to the Committee that by 30 June 2009, UNHCR had obtained over 50 per cent of the required audit certificates: an improved performance over prior years.
In response to questions regarding the application of the five per cent"freeze" on 2005 programme andnon-staff administrative cost budgets, the Controller explained that caps were on a regional basis and that bureaux directors were responsible for deciding which particular budgets would be reduced.
The Controller explained that changing needs on the ground and the rates of exchange of several non-USD currencies, as well as newly identified needs, were responsible for the revision.
In response to a call for UNHCR to further explain how limited resources are allocated to various parts of the budget, the Controller explained that the High Commissioner regularly reviews the financial situation and makes adjustments to allocated resources in order to reprioritize what was available.
Mr. TAKASU(Controller) explained that the statement of implications was based on paragraph 5 of the draft resolution, which specified that the group's activities would be financed from existing resources.
In introducing this conference room paper, the Controller explained the rationale for adopting different approaches for different categories of implementing partners.
The Controller explained that the steadily increasing staff costs reflected changing demands, including the need to have more protection staff and security officers in the Field.
Regarding the reduction of costs at Headquarters, the Controller explained that this was achieved in a number of ways including reducing travel budgets and delaying some non-essential activities.
Mr. TAKASU(Controller) explained that when the Secretary-General had submitted his initial programme budget proposals for 1996-1997, he had presented a comparison with the budget for the previous biennium.
In response to a query regarding the increased number of staffing positions, the Controller explained that in 2009, the total number of annual programme posts plus supplementary programme posts was 6,703; in 2010, 7,782 posts were anticipated, provided that the programmes budgeted for were fully funded.
The Controller explained that the review of the Operational Reserve Category II, presented in document EC/55/SC/CRP.6, also contained the report of the independent consultant as well as a draft decision proposing an extension of the pilot scheme.
In response to the concerns over funding for Africa, the Controller explained that the 2011 budget level reflected the cost of many emergencies, and with the anticipated resolution of these, the initial 2012 budget level was set lower.
The Controller explained the complexities of the prioritization process and the difficult decisions that management had to take in light of changing scenarios, new emergencies which required reprogramming, and the unpredictability of funding.
In her presentation of the proposed 2010-2011 Biennial Programme Budget(EC/60/SC/CRP.27), the Controller explained that the field budgets had been presented at the"comprehensive" level, representing the totality of needs identified through the global needs assessment process, while global programmes and headquarters budgets had already been prioritized.
The Controller explained that 72 per cent of costs(covering some 3,000 posts) represented programme costs which included direct inputs for projects affecting refugees, including protection officer posts and offices in the Field.
Responding to requests for UNHCR to include more information on results in the budget document, the Controller explained that the Office was limited by UN documentation control, which restricted the number of pages allowed, and reminded delegations that information on implementation and contributions from donors could be found in the Global Report.
The Controller explained that the paper being presented(EC/55/SC/CRP.7) provided a preliminary analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of a biennialization of the budget cycle, which would be further elaborated upon at forthcoming informal consultative meetings.
Regarding the latter point, the Controller explained that in view of its goal of becoming IPSAS compliant in 2011, it was important to define the"approved budget" of UNHCR against which all expenditures would be reported to ExCom.
The Controller explained that the GMAF contained responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities which were now being assigned to individuals at their different levels and translated into job descriptions, which could then be linked to performance management.
Mr. Sach(Controller) explained that the information in the report of the Secretary-General had been provided in response to a number of requests contained in the 2005 World Summit Outcome(General Assembly resolution 60/1), particularly paragraphs 161(d), 164(b) and 164 c.
Mr. TAKASU(Controller), explaining the Secretariat's position on draft resolution A/C.5/50/L.42, said that the Secretary-General, in his report(A/50/876), expressed the hope that the General Assembly would ensure the adequate and predictable annual level of resources necessary to meet the minimum backstopping requirements at Headquarters, based on the outcome of the comprehensive review.
Ms. Casar(Controller), explaining the Secretariat's approach to implementing General Assembly resolution 67/248 on the proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2014-2015, and accompanying her briefing with a digital slide presentation, said that the preparation of the proposed programme budget for 2014-2015, on the basis of the outline for that biennium, continued to be guided by the relevant General Assembly resolutions, including 41/213 and 47/212, and General Assembly decision 67/551.
The Controller also explained that earmarking was in itself a form of prioritization, hence constraining the High Commissioner's ability to prioritize.
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Radio 1's controller Ben Cooper explained that the station has not"banned" Madonna, and that a group of twelve 16-24 aged personnel would meet on a regular basis to review the network's musical output, determining the relevant musical choice for their demographic.