Примеры использования Delegations also expressed the view на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some delegations also expressed the view that reference should be made to trade.
During the second reading of the draft text, at the third session of the Ad Hoc Committee, some delegations also expressed the view that the article should provide for exceptions from the standards foreseen for procurement related to national security.
Some delegations also expressed the view that the work should complement the activities of ITU.
While some delegations considered that an international instrument should focus on addressing legal orregulatory gaps, several delegations also expressed the view that an international instrument could promote a more comprehensive approach to, and strengthen implementation of, existing obligations and therefore also address implementation gaps.
Some delegations also expressed the view that the Subcommittee should conclude its consideration of that issue.
Several delegations also expressed the view that article II of the Convention should be reproduced without change.
Those delegations also expressed the view that such declarations by States parties would enhance the effectiveness and credibility of the Convention.
Many delegations also expressed the view that the language of paragraph 3, if accepted, would provide for an excessively wide exclusion to the scope of the protocol.
Several delegations also expressed the view that any enlargement of the Security Council should take into account the ratio of permanent to non-permanent members.
Some delegations also expressed the view that many States were parties to the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement, including most major fishing States.
Several delegations also expressed the view that the term“international trafficking” should be defined in order to clarify what situations would be covered under the Protocol.
Those delegations also expressed the view that the draft space assets protocol would ultimately be negotiated by the States members of Unidroit through the Unidroit process.
Several delegations also expressed the view that the paragraph as currently formulated unduly restricted the activities of the Security Council, beyond what was permitted under the Charter.
Those delegations also expressed the view that, although it was clear that the costs of the supervisory authority should be reimbursed, it was unclear from what sources any initial payments would be made.
Some delegations also expressed the view that special reports of the Council to the Assembly should be forthcoming, in accordance with Article 15, paragraph 1, and Article 24, paragraph 3, of the Charter.
Those delegations also expressed the view that there remained a risk that the United Nations might have to pay compensatory damages should it decide to assume the role of supervisory authority.
Some delegations also expressed the view that establishing such a definition was inappropriate as the subject of space debris had just been taken up by the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee at its 1994 session.
Those delegations also expressed the view that such declarations by States parties would enhance the effectiveness and credibility of the Convention and called upon States parties to the Convention to make such declarations.
Many delegations also expressed the view that a concise, forward-looking policy document with a perspective of no more than five years, developed in consultation with Member States, might be the best possible solution.
Those delegations also expressed the view that efforts should continue to be made to develop the technical ability to begin removing existing space debris from its orbit in order to halt the deterioration in the space environment.
Those delegations also expressed the view that this will also violate the stipulations of the same paragraph that the Secretary-General and the staff shall be responsible only to the United Nations.
Those delegations also expressed the view that the future protocol might require the Secretary-General to seek or receive instructions from external authorities and thus would conflict with Article 100 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Delegations also expressed the view that assessments can raise more concern for refugees in international fora and among the population in donor countries, as well as possibly improve the environment of asylum in host countries and contribute to preventive endeavours.
Those same delegations also expressed the view that the Legal Subcommittee could concentrate on an exchange of information regarding legal implications associated with space debris, by beginning a preliminary review of existing norms in international law applicable to space debris.
Those delegations also expressed the view that, in addition to marine scientific research, intellectual property issues relating to marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction were key issues that needed to be addressed in a future implementing agreement.
Those delegations also expressed the view that the Subcommittee and its members had expertise that might be valuable in the development of the future protocol, but that the protocol would ultimately be negotiated by the States members of Unidroit through the Unidroit process.
Those delegations also expressed the view that while the draft space assets protocol would ultimately be negotiated by States members of Unidroit through the Unidroit process, that process had already included many States members of the Subcommittee and considered requests from States not members of Unidroit who wished to attend.
Some delegations also expressed the view that, in the matter of the creation of posts, programme managers/heads of departments or offices should certify in writing the reasons for the new post or posts and why the need could not be met from within the posts currently available within that department or office.
Those delegations also expressed the view that the Subcommittee, under the proposed sub-item, should only discuss the appropriateness and desirability of drafting a universal comprehensive convention and should not actually start drafting a convention and that the development of the convention should not reopen the debate on existing principles of international space law contained in the United Nations treaties on outer space.